Jump to content

User talk:Shaheryar Shabbir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shaheryar Shabbir (talk | contribs) at 14:54, 22 September 2020 (→‎September 2020). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

hey mate. finally somone has marked waqar zaka page for deletion. its time you ask waqar zaka to ask his followers to make as many delete votes as they can so that his page is finally removed.

that would be considered gaiman. GeraldWL 17:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Waqar_Zaka_(2nd_nomination) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.219.18.167 (talk) 14:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shaheryar Shabbir, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Shaheryar Shabbir! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Shaheryar Shabbir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 16:19, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read. The. Policy.

The policy in question can be found at this link. It says: Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, ...and home or business addresses. emphasis added This includes passports, birth certificates, etc. Wikipedia has no interest in stating what a person wants stated about themselves. Wikipedia only has interest in stating what has been previously reported in reliable, secondary sources. This has already been explained multiple times but apparently your client is not accepting of this. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:05, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Shaheryar Shabbir! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Editing, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you recently removed content from Waqar Zaka without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707 (talk) 13:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shaheryar Shabbir (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)I'm very much upset because Mr Waqar Zaka is very much angry regarding all the details posted about him on his Wikipedia is 70% false and misleading his image to his fans and supporters, He is a leading celebrity in Pakistan whose 70% details on Wikipedia are false and incomplete Shaheryar Shabbir (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Shaheryar Shabbir. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Shaheryar Shabbir. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Shaheryar Shabbir|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Joseph2302 (talk) 14:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Waqar Zaka. Template:Z189 Joseph2302 (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not paid, I'm his Social Media manager and You can verify my links with him Shaheryar Shabbir (talk) 14:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a social media platform, and he doesn't own the article about him on Wikipedia, the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Also, please read WP:PAID, you're employed by him and so therefore meet our paid editor terms of use. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Listen I'm new to wikipedia, I don't really know much about it, All I know that he wants to get the page deleted, and If he doesn't owns his own Article then I think he can move legally through Laws about all the false and incompleted info written about it right? Shaheryar Shabbir (talk) 14:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]