This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 06:51, June 18, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Source for James Marsters claim
A lot of people seem to be running with an assessment that the guy voicing Zamas is really James Marsters with no real source to properly verify the claim outside of a single tweet by Funimation announcing that the voice actor is a guy by the name of David Grey. Which fails, as it does not call Marsters out in any official capacity. There needs to some kind of source that properly verifies any involvement Marsters might have with Dragon Ball Super. For all we know, David Grey might be an actual actor who's doing a flawless James Marsters impression for the role. Sarujo (talk) 00:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This source is not helpful. First, unverified account and the account holder isn't an established source, which is not a preferable choice for citation. Second, the interviewee was Sean Schemmel, a fellow voice actor (and often they don't work together in the studio at the same time due to scheduling), not Christopher Sabat who works as the voice director and has a degree of authority over casting work. If this is such an important piece of information, why didn't any of the anime or manga websites report on this revelation by Schemmel which he dropped in an interview with an unknown content creator? I suspect that because if they are aware of this interview and if they do so, it would undermine their reputation as a reliable source of information. As for BTVA, I invite you to peruse this page on IMDB which talks about how information on BTVA really gets verified with the green tick, and no it's not the actors' agents who provides confirmation of casting roles directly with BTVA: https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/how-to-effectively-use-behind-the-voice-actors-as-a-source-of-information/5f4a7a308815453dba9d41f8
My understanding is that "Sam Majesters" is the credited voice actor for Zamasu in the video games, David Grey in the anime dub. So it appears that BTVA connected these identities to Marsters based on conjecture, but that doesn't mean wikipedia editors should follow suit. In the source I provided, Marsters was asked point black about it by CBR in an interview 2 years ago and he refused to confirm or deny his involvement. The most recent source I have provided, in French, also confirms that neither Marsters nor Sabat have come out and clarify once and for all that David Grey and Sam Majesters are the aliases used by Masters. I think the way I've worded the situation with Zamasu's voice works out the best so far. Any statements which connects both Grey and Majesters to Marsters as a definitive statement of fact, as supposed to keeping a neutral POV by simply reporting on both the confirmation and the speculations at face value according to cited searches, violates Wikipedia's policy on original research, because the sources simply aren't there. Haleth (talk) 16:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To editor SubZeroSilver: To add to Haleth's statement. As a rule of thumb, anything that comes from Geekdom101 should be taken with a grain of salt - verified or unverified. Sarujo (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]