Talk:Cynical realism
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | China Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Philosophy: Aesthetics Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Cynical Realism → Cynical realism — proper title format Greg Bard 02:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
What is the Chinese for this?
It's suspicious that an article about a supposed Chinese artistic movement does not give a Chinese name for that movement. I checked the Chinese-language Wikipedia pages of the artists cited. None actually give them the label "Cynical Realism" in Chinese.
With a bit of Google searching I did find that the term 玩世现实主义 does apparently exist, and is routinely translated into English as "Cynical realism". See this article: https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%8E%A9%E4%B8%96%E7%8E%B0%E5%AE%9E%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89. Shouldn't the Chinese name of the movement be added to the article?
- Stub-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class Aesthetics articles
- Low-importance Aesthetics articles
- Aesthetics task force articles