User talk:Arjayay

E-mails

You can use "Email this user" in the panel on the left, but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.

Broadcasted

The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is sometimes proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B

Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".

A September 2020 search for Broadcast gave over 210,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 81.
Of these 8i, 16 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 16 refer to a Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are in quotations.

---

---

Request for creating a new page

Arjayay, could you creat a new wikipedia article named Climate of Siliguri? Do it with Wikimedia commons. Just create it, then I will expand that with reliable informations. User:2409:4061:417:CA23:0:0:1E9:A8A0 (talk) 09:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

No, IP from Kolkata, if you want to create an article on Climate of Siliguri, please use the articles for creation process - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 17:06, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice. I tried to create, but currently it is a draft. How to convert it to an article? Please tell me the next steps.

User:2409:4061:16:EF53:0:0:286A:B0B1 (talk) 09:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

I am continuing with editing the draft. User:223.233.46.49 (talk) 13:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Arjayay, what tags will I add to the draft, Climate of Siliguri? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.226.238.122 (talk) 15:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft page Cinque Vette Park

@Arjayay: Hi, could you give a look at our Wikipedia group project draft page (Draft:Cinque Vette Park, Lombardy)? We would be extrimely greateful if you could do so. We submitted it for review on the 29^th of November, but it has not been accepted it yet.Dervareser (talk) 15:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

• Could you please remove Pro-constitutional amendment camp link in Hong Kong Autonomy Movement, Localism in Hong Kong and Civic Passion–Proletariat Political Institute–Hong Kong Resurgence Order? Thank you. UU (talk) 15:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Unblock Me

Hello Arjayay. I have been unblocked from Wikimedia. Sorry for that. I have been realised my mistake. But it is long time. Please unblock me. I know this is Wikipedia. But I think you have Wikimedia account also. I promise I will not violate copyright from any images. Thank You. -- Weareme 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lotsa Luck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Knight.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Arjayay, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

••••🎄Merry Christmas🎄••••

"May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ..Merry Christmas.. and a ..Happy New Year.., whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you ..warm greetings.. for Christmas and New Year 2021."

Happy editing,
User:245CMR

Reverted

Mr. Arjayay User:Arjayay it is correct , Please check the link first

Kallars were listed as 'Criminal Tribe' during British regime under Criminal Tribes Act of 1871 due to their repeated offence of banditry,mass murders and rape. விக்னேஷ்வர் பா மாளுசுத்தியார் (talk) 11:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Which says "The British Government introduced the Act in 1870 and implemented it in 1914 on communities like Keezhakudi Kallar ... " - Arjayay (talk) 11:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Mr. Arjayay You are right, I agreed. But please once again go through the law. This law is not related to this -> (repeated offence of banditry,mass murders and rape)

Please read the below hindu article :

HISTORY & CULTURE Namma Madurai - Massacre in a village S. S. KAVITHAAUGUST 03, 2011 19:47 IST UPDATED: AUGUST 03, 2011 19:47 IST SHARE ARTICLEPRINTA A A

MEMORIES AND A MEMORIAL: The pillar at Perungamanallur. Photo: S.S.Kavitha

The pillar at Perungamanallur tells the tale of a little-known tragedy Anyone familiar with the history of modern India is likely to be aware of April 13, 1919; of General Dyer and of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to call the Perungamanallur killings, which took place on April 3, 1920, as the south Indian Jallianwala.

The black pillar with a burning torch on top in Perungamanallur tells the heartrending story of villagers who fought for their rights against an Act.

Before getting into the history of the pillar, it would be right to understand the Criminal Tribes Act that triggered the carnage. The British Government introduced the Act in 1870 and implemented it in 1914 on communities like Keezhakudi Kallar and Thogamalai Kuravar. The Act was first implemented on Keezhakudi.

In 1919, the whole of Piramalai Kallar community came under the scan of Criminal Tribes Act. According to the Act, the members of Kallar community had to register themselves by submitting their thumb impression at the respective police stations. In addition, male members above 16 years had to spend their nights in police stations and get police permission to visit their relatives.

As a result, villagers who resented being labelled as criminals, disobeyed the order. Residents of Perungamanallur were the first to oppose registration. Residents of Kaalappanpatti and Kaniyampatti joined them in the protest, which resulted in the firing. Soon the resistance spread to nearby villages like Melaurappanur, Poosalapuram and Sorikampatti. In the melee, scores of protestors were killed. “As per Government record, only 12 persons including one woman named Mayakkal were killed,” says Su.Venkatesan, who has authored a 1300-page novel, ‘Kaaval Kottam', dealing with life in Madurai region.

But the pillar has 16 names engraved on it. Probably many who got shot might were killed while fleeing, he says, adding that 63 people were subsequently arrested and tortured.

After realising that it was impossible to subjugate the people with force, the Government decided to implement welfare measures. It established schools, and introduced the Kallar Common Fund and the Kallar Panchayat System.

As expected, the memory of the massacre has now faded.

Recognising the importance of the village and massacre in the history of south India, Narayanaswamy Naidu of Tamil Nadu Farmers Association, in 1984, took out a farmers rally from the village. Only after that Perungamanallur came under the spotlight, remembers Venkatesan.

In 1991, Muthu Karrupa Thevar paid homage to martyrs and took the initiative of constructing a pillar in their memory, says Venkatesan.

Lawyer Sundara Vandhiya Thevan, who is carrying out research on Piramalaikallars, says the massacre victims were mass-buried at Punnaipatti near Usilampatti. “Now there is no trace of the mass burial, though some people claim to have installed a memory stone”, he adds.

Kasi Mayan, a villager, says: “The incident took place in the interior part of the village. For the sake of visibility, the villagers have constructed the pillar on the main road.” The old police stations still stand at Sindhupatti and Poosalapuram, telling the tales of a tragedy.

References

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	thanks Annu Ann George 12:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

Arjayay,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Arjayay!

Happy New Year!

Arjayay,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
MRRaja001 ^(talk) 12:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Arjayay!

Happy New Year!

Arjayay,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Kalariwarrior (talk) 03:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

Please Understand

Dear Arjayay, I know now about that image. But that image is now short. Please don't remove it now. Have a nice day. God Bless You - User:Mumtazabdullahahsan1 (talk) 8:53 PM, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Mumtazabdullahahsan1 you are obviously not a new editor - perhaps you would like to tell us what your previous user name was ? - Arjayay (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Margaret Durrell

Would you please stop the edit war? It was argued on Margaret's talk page whether she should have her own article. The main reason for keeping it was that she wrote an autobiography. Anyway, you can hardly call her a writer. P.S. Basically, Margo's only merit was to be portrayed (in a highly fictionalized manner) in Gerald Durrell's books, two TV adaptations and one movie. Other than that, nobody knows her. Pointing out (let alone in the lead) that Lawrence is Margaret's brother is hardly necessary; it's like saying that he was Nancy Myers's first husband. P.P.S. The same is true of their mother, who also has an article. Note that their father has an article, too. Does it mean we should mention (in the lead) that Lawrence (as well as Gerald) was their son? I don't think so. Taurus Littrow (talk) 14:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit on Roman Egypt

Firstly, thank you for your tireless fixing of my errors, especially the duplicate words I appear to enjoy leaving about, you're doing an indispensable job!

But this edit was not right: the plural of metropolis is "metropoleis" (cf. "necropolis", "necropoleis") and the people living there are called "metropolites". Too much Greek inflection I guess? Do you think this not simple enough for the lead? I suppose it looks as if it's a spelling mistake; if so it's probably not clear enough for the reader and I'll have to rephrase it! GPinkerton (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

I note Wiktionary describes this plural form as "rare" (not what I would have thought!), but in this case it's a technical term in its original, Hellenistic context ... GPinkerton (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi GPinkerton - It's all Greek to me - but joking aside, I went to the article because it came up in my search for "a an", which I corrected, during which my spellcheck highlighted the other words I changed.
If the use is "rare", and it is not recognised by spellcheckers, I suspect I will not be the only person changing it so maybe a rewording would be appropriate. I don't agree with "dumbing down" and technical terms are fine in technical articles, but Roman Egypt is a general article that will be read by the general public, probably including a lot of schoolchildren, so I think it needs to be pitched at that readership. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 10:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

What is your Problem?

What is your problem?. If I am editing and making article better then what is your problem. - User:Abdullahmumtazahsan (talk) 19:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Abdullahmumtazahsan The problem is entirely yours - as already explained on your talk page, you are repeatedly making unsourced, and/or unreliably sourced, additions. On Wikipedia the BURDEN is on whoever adds information to provide references to Reliable sources. Not to create work for other people, who you expect to clean up after you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I have blocked the user for 31 hours. Bishonen | tålk 16:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC).

Thanks Bishonen. I have also started an SPI - Arjayay (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

About Allophilia and Todd L. Pittinsky

Sorry I just realized that there was a message from you. I'm Aji, a new wikipedia user who doesn't know anything yet. I was commissioned by Prof. Todd L. Pittinsky to build him a Wikipedia Page and link it to Allophillia.

I really don't understand the mechanism of moving pages from draft to main article. Some sources say that I need to be an autoconfirmed user, I have already checked my contribution and I should have been autoconfirmed. However, the option to move page to article has not yet appeared. Then now the information appears that you have to wait about 3 months to move to the main article / delete the draft article. Do you have any suggestions or can help me, so that I can immediately connect Prof. Draft: Todd L. Pittinsky's page with Allophilia's Pages? User:Bernardusaji

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernardusaji (talk • contribs) 10:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Bernardusaji, this raises two major problems
Firstly, you have a clear WP:Conflict of interest, so should not be editing that page,
More importantly you are breaking Wikipedia's terms of use, as you have not issued a WP:Paid-contribution disclosure although you were "commissioned by Prof. Todd L. Pittinsky".
Please read both the articles connected by the blue links and follow the instructions therein - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Arjayay: Well, thanks for the suggestion. I've read what you have listed and put several contexts on the talk page.

Should be underline that neither Prof Pittinsky and I were knowing this kind of policy.

Its main purpose is to connect the Allophillia article's link with Prof Pittinsky's page because his name is listed.

There is no bad intention at all from us.

If this was wrong from the start, is there any suggestion from you? I have absolutely no problem if I am not directly allowed to edit the article again. I will inform Prof Pittinsky about the Wikipedia regulation.

How to find the right editor so that this page can be published without crossing the Wikipedia COI regulation.

The sources on Prof. Pittinsky's page are also credible, the same as his campus profile. There is no intention of exaggerating anything.

If you allow, is it permissible for the writing you provide on the talk page of Prof. Todd's page to be deleted first so that the article creation can be straightened out without giving any public embarrassment?. Bernardusaji (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Bernardusaji the need for a WP:Paid-contribution disclosure was clearly explained to you above, but you have continued editing without making the required disclosure - I'm not sure if you tried at Draft talk:Todd L. Pittinsky, but that is not how to do it. Please do that before making any otheredits.
In addition. do not remove other editors posts from talk pages, especially the post where I provided evidence of your COI editing - thus providing another example of your COI editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

I promise

Dear Arjayay, I know about sockpuppetry. I am so sorry for that. Now only my this account is unblock. Please don't block this. I promise I will not do this again. I have decided this will be my final ID - Abdullahmumtazahsan (talk) 17:00, 06 January 2021 (UTC)

Cite Error

Dear Arjayay: Can you tell what's creating the Cite Error on footnote #1 at Mervyn LeRoy? My thanks in advance. Lord Such&Such (talk) 16:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Lord Such&Such in this edit you removed <ref name=finler>{{citation|last=Finler|first=Joel W.|year=1992|title=The Hollywood Story|edition=Second|publisher=Mandarin|page=[https://archive.org/details/hollywoodstory00joel/page/458 458]|isbn=0-7493-0637-8|url=https://archive.org/details/hollywoodstory00joel/page/458}}</ref> - however the reference named "finler" was also being used in the infobox, using the "ref name=" parameter, so it looks for the reference named "finler" and can't find it - hence the cite ref. I've re-added the reference in the infobox. - Arjayay (talk) 17:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the correction. And Happy New Year.Lord Such&Such (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

List of miscellaneous fictional animals

Dear Arjayay,

I'm sorry for the late reply. I haven't been on Wikipedia for several days now. I also apologize for posting my draft on the eponymous page mentioned above. I was wondering if it was okay for me to classify the whales, dolphins, and porpoises under "Cetaceans" though, since they are? I was also wondering if it was okay for me to remove them from the "Carnivorans" section because they do not belong with the Carnivora family. Also, last question, where can I advertise my draft to get better feedback about it?

Thanks.

Batypus (talk)