User:Zanygenius
Appearance
Redirect page
Redirect to:
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zanygenius. |
|
Navigation
[edit]User overview
[edit]
This clock was originally created by User:Ais523, with improvements made by User:Shardsofmetal. Thank you both! |
Work
[edit]
Friendly Talk page feed
[edit]Over the time I've been on Wikipedia, I"ve more and more gotten in deep. Many conversations were serious. Today I build my kitchen. And now we can have it light. It is not jsut for newbies to talk to me, but for everyone. We won't talk about anything related to edit disputes unless we can propose it softly. I feel like I have chomped down on too many editors. Sorry!
Select your brew | |||
---|---|---|---|
...And then...
A calm but fun game? | |
---|---|
Or should we just have our drinks and chat? |
Begin your discussion below. The pot is ready. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanygenius (talk • contribs) 04:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
By Bot
[edit]This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2019)
[edit]The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:
Dairy product
Please be bold and help to improve this article!
Previous selections: Story of the Negro • Gym
Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations
Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions
By Person
[edit]WikiCup 2019 March newsletter
[edit]And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).