Halt and Catch Fire (computing)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wernher (talk | contribs) at 12:24, 9 October 2007 (→‎References: mv sec below See also). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Halt and Catch Fire, known by the mnemonic HCF, was originally a fictitious computer machine code instruction claimed to be under development at IBM for use in their System/360 computers, along with many other amusing instructions such as "Execute Operator".

In modern practice, HCF denotes an undocumented machine code instruction with unusual side-effects, included in the processor for test purposes. The old "Halt and Catch Fire" instruction and HCF mnemonic were appropriated by users who discovered these instructions as a humorous way of expressing that the unintended execution of such an instruction causes the system to fail to perform its normal functions, while nevertheless appearing quite busy. The expression "catch fire" is strictly metaphorical.

A real life HCF

The Motorola 6800 microprocessor was the first for which an HCF opcode became widely known. The origin of the 6800 HCF opcode (0xDD or 0xD9) came from an article written by Gerry Wheeler (1952–2006) in the December 1977 issue of BYTE magazine on undocumented opcodes.[1] The instruction makes the processor enter a mode intended for manufacturing testing, in which it continuously performs memory read cycles from successive addresses, with no intervening instruction fetches. Effectively the address bus becomes a counter, allowing the operation of all address lines to be quickly verified. Once the processor has entered this test mode, it is not responsive to interrupts, so normal operation can only be restored by a reset.

Potential damage

There are apocryphal results of damage resulting from the use of such instructions, but there is no documented evidence of such an instruction actually causing damage to a computer. Obviously special instructions designed into a processor for use in manufacturing tests would not be designed in such a manner as to cause damage to that processor.

However, in an embedded system the unintended execution of an HCF instruction could easily cause problems in the system being controlled. For instance, the system could fail to stop a machine when the closure of a limit switch occurs. This problem is not specific to an HCF instruction, and could occur if the software "crashes" for any reason. Properly designed systems have hardware interlocks and watchdog timers to prevent such occurrences or limit their consequences.

Specific processors with HCF opcode

  • 6502, and in general the NMOS 650x and 651x series processors
  • 6800
  • 6809
  • MIPS-X: the Programmer's Manual describes a fictitious HSC (Halt and Spontaneously Combust) instruction.


See also

  1. ^ Wheeler, Gerry (December 1977). "Undocumented M6800 Instructions". BYTE. 2 (12): 46–47.