Hanford Site

Coordinates: 46°30′00″N 119°30′00″W / 46.50000°N 119.50000°W / 46.50000; -119.50000 (Handford Site) Coordinates: Parameter: "region=" should be "region:"
Coordinates: Parameter: "type=" should be "type:"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Northwesterner1 (talk | contribs) at 22:29, 6 February 2008 (moved alternate names). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nuclear reactors at the Hanford Site along the Columbia River. The N-Reactor is in the foreground, with the twin KE and KW Reactors in the immediate background. The historic B-Reactor, the world's first plutonium production reactor, is visible in the distance.

The Hanford Site is a decommissioned nuclear productions complex in south-central Washington operated by the United States government. (It has been known by many names, including Hanford Works, Hanford Engineering Works, Hanford Nuclear Reservation, and the Hanford Project.)Established in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project, it was home to the B-Reactor, the first full-scale plutonium production reactor in the world.[1] Plutonium manufactured at the site was used in the first nuclear bomb, tested at the Trinity site, and in Fat Man, the bomb dropped on Nagasaki, Japan.

During the Cold War, the project was expanded to include nine nuclear reactors and five massive plutonium processing complexes, which produced plutonium for most of the 60,000 weapons in the U.S. nuclear arsenal.[2][3] Nuclear technology developed rapidly during this period, and Hanford scientists produced many notable technological achievements. However, many of the early safety procedures and waste disposal practices were inadequate. Government documents have since confirmed that Hanford's operations released significant amounts of radioactive materials to the air and to the Columbia River, which may have threatened the health of residents and ecosystems. In addition, large quantities of radioactive and chemical wastes were stored in conditions that would not be acceptable today.[4]

The weapons production reactors were decommissioned at the end of the Cold War, but the manufacturing process left behind 53 million U.S. gallons (204,000 m³) of high-level radioactive waste that remains at the site.[5] This represents two-thirds of the nation's high-level radioactive waste by volume.[6] Today, Hanford is the most contaminated nuclear site in the United States[7][8] and is the focus of the world’s largest environmental cleanup.[2] It is also a center for scientific research and development.

Geography

Map showing the main areas of the Hanford site, as well as the buffer zone that was turned over to the Hanford Reach National Monument in 2000. See also this virtual tour of the site.

The Hanford Site occupies 586 square miles (1,518 km2) in Benton County, Washington (centered on 46°30′00″N 119°30′00″W / 46.50000°N 119.50000°W / 46.50000; -119.50000 (Handford Site) Coordinates: Parameter: "region=" should be "region:"
Coordinates: Parameter: "type=" should be "type:"
), roughly equivalent to half the total area of Rhode Island.[2] This land is currently uninhabited and is closed to the general public. It is a near-desert environment, covered mostly by shrub-steppe vegetation. The Columbia River flows along the site for approximately 50 miles (80 km), forming its northern and eastern boundary. The original site was 670 square miles (1,735 km2) and included buffer areas across the river in Grant and Franklin county.[9] Some of this land has been returned to private use and is now covered with orchards and irrigated fields. In 2000, large portions of the site were turned over to the Hanford Reach National Monument.[10]

The site is divided by function into three main areas, as shown in the map at right. The nuclear reactors were located along the river in an area designated as the 100 Area; the chemical separations complexes were located inland in the Central Plateau, designated as the 200 Area; and various support facilities were located in the southeast corner of the site, designated as the 300 Area.[11]

The site is bordered on the southeast by the Tri-Cities, a metropolitan area home to nearly 200,000 people living in the cities of Richland, Kennewick, Pasco, and smaller communities. Hanford is the primary economic base for these cities.[12]

Early history

The confluence of the Yakima, Snake, and Columbia Rivers has been a meeting place for native peoples for centuries. The archaeological record of Native American occupation of this area stretches back ten thousand years. Tribes and nations including the Yakama, Nez Perce, and Umatilla used the area for hunting, fishing, and gathering plant foods.[13] Hanford archaeologists have identified numerous Native American sites, including "pit house villages, open campsites, fishing sites, hunting/kill sites, game drive complexes, quarries, and spirit quest sites,"[14] and two archaeological sites were listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1976.[15] Native American use of the area continued into the 20th century, even as the tribes were relocated to reservations. The Wanapum people were never forced onto a reservation, and they lived along the Columbia River in the Priest Rapids Valley until 1943.[16] Euro-American settlers began arriving in the 1860s, settling along the Columbia River south of Priest Rapids. They established farms and orchards supported by small-scale irrigation projects and railroad transportation, with small town centers at Hanford, White Bluffs, and Richland.[17]

Manhattan Project

During World War II, the Uranium Committee of the federal Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) sponsored an intensive research project on plutonium. At the time, plutonium was a rare element that had only recently been isolated in a University of California laboratory. The contract was awarded to scientists at the University of Chicago Metallurgical Laboratory. They worked on producing chain-reacting "piles" of uranium to convert to plutonium and finding ways to separate plutonium from uranium. The program was accelerated in 1942, as the United States government became concerned that scientists in Nazi Germany were developing a nuclear weapons program.[18]

Site selection

In September 1942, the Army Corps of Engineers placed the newly-formed Manhattan Project under the command of General Leslie R. Groves, charging him with the construction of industrial-size plants for manufacturing plutonium and uranium.[19] Groves recruited the DuPont Company to be the prime contractor for the construction of the plutonium production complex. DuPont recommended that it be located far away from the existing uranium production facility at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The ideal site was described by these criteria:

  • A large and remote tract of land
  • A "hazardous manufacturing area" of at least 12 miles (19 km) by 16 miles (26 km)
  • Space for laboratory facilities at least 8 miles (13 km) from the nearest reactor or separations plant
  • No towns of more than 1,000 people closer than 20 miles (32 km) from the hazardous rectangle
  • No main highway, railway, or employee village closer than 10 miles (16 km) from the hazardous rectangle
  • A clean and abundant water supply
  • A large electric power supply
  • Ground that could bear heavy loads[20]

In December 1942, Groves dispatched his assistant Colonel Franklin T. Matthias and DuPont engineers to scout potential sites. Matthias reported that Hanford was "ideal in virtually all respects", except for the farming towns of White Bluffs and Hanford.[21] General Groves visited the site in January and established the Hanford Engineer Works, codenamed "Site W." The federal government quickly acquired the land under its eminent domain authority and forcefully removed some 1,500 residents of Hanford, White Bluffs, and nearby settlements, as well as the Wanapum and other tribes using the area.[22]

Construction begins

B-Reactor construction (1944)

The Hanford Engineer Works (HEW) broke ground in March 1943 and immediately launched a massive and technically challenging construction project. Nearly 50,000 workers lived in a construction camp near the old Hanford townsite, while administrators and engineers lived in the government town established at Richland Village.[23] Construction of the nuclear facilities proceeded rapidly. Before the end of the war in August 1945, the HEW built 554 buildings at Hanford, including three nuclear reactors (105-B, 105-D, and 105-F) and three plutonium processing canyons (221-T, 221-B, and 221-U), each 250 metres (820 ft) long. To receive the radioactive wastes from the chemical separations process, the HEW built "tank farms" consisting of 64 single-shell underground waste tanks (241-B, 241-C, 241-T, and 241-U).[24] The scale of the Hanford project is indicated by the fact that it required 386 miles (621 km) of roads, 158 miles (254 km) of railway, and four electrical substations. The HEW used 780,000 cubic yards (600,000 m³) of concrete and 40,000 short tons (36,300 MT) of structural steel and consumed $230 million between 1943 and 1946.[25]

Plutonium production

Front face of the B-Reactor

The B-Reactor (105-B) at Hanford was the first large-scale plutonium production reactor in the world. It was designed and built by DuPont based on an experimental design by Enrico Fermi, and originally operated at 250 megawatts. The reactor was graphite moderated and water cooled. It consisted of a 28- by 36-foot (8.5- by 11-meter), 1,200-ton graphite cylinder lying on its side, penetrated through its entire length horizontally by 2,004 aluminum tubes. Two hundred short tons (181 MT) of uranium slugs the size of rolls of quarters and sealed in aluminum cans went into the tubes. Cooling water was pumped through the aluminum tubes around the uranium slugs at the rate of 30,000 US gallons (110,000 L) per minute.[26]

Construction on the B-Reactor began in August 1943 and was completed slightly more than a year later, on September 13, 1944. The reactor went critical in late September and, after overcoming nuclear poisoning, produced its first plutonium on November 6, 1944.[27] Plutonium was produced in the Hanford reactors when a Uranium-238 atom in a fuel slug absorbed a neutron to form Uranium-239. U-239 rapidly undergoes beta decay to form Neptunium-239, which rapidly undergoes a second beta decay to form Plutonium-239. The irradiated fuel slugs were transported by rail to three huge remotely operated chemical separation plants called "canyons" that were located about 10 miles (16 km) away. A series of chemical processing steps separated the small amount of plutonium that was produced from the remaining uranium and the fission waste products. This first batch of plutonium was refined in the 221-T plant from December 26, 1944, to February 2, 1945, and delivered to the Los Alamos National Laboratory on February 5, 1945.[28]

Two identical reactors, the D-Reactor and the F-reactor, came online in December 1944 and February 1945, respectively. By April 1945, shipments of plutonium were headed to Los Alamos every five days, and Hanford soon provided enough material for the bombs dropped at Trinity and Nagasaki.[29] Throughout this period, the Manhattan Project maintained a top secret classification. Until news arrived of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, fewer than one percent of Hanford's workers knew they were working on a nuclear weapons project.[30] General Groves noted in his memoirs that "We made certain that each member of the project thoroughly understood his part in the total effort; that, and nothing more."[31]

Scientific innovations

In the compressed time frame of the Manhattan Project, Hanford engineers produced many significant technological advances. As no one had ever built an industrial-scale reactor before, scientists were unsure how much heat would be generated by fission during normal operations. Seeking the greatest margin of error, DuPont engineers installed ammonia-based refrigeration systems with the D and F reactors to further chill the river water prior to its use as reactor coolant.[32]

Another issue the engineers struggled with was how to deal with radioactive contamination. Once the canyons began processing irradiated slugs, the machinery would become so radioactive that it would be unsafe for humans ever to come in contact with it. The engineers therefore had to devise methods to allow for the replacement of any component via remote control. They came up with a modular cell concept, which allowed major components to be removed and replaced by an operator sitting in a heavily shielded overhead crane. This method required early practical application of two technologies that later gained widespread use: Teflon, used as a gasket material, and closed-circuit television, used to give the crane operator a better view of the process.[33]

Cold War expansion

Decommissioning the D-Reactor

In September 1946, the General Electric Company assumed management of the Hanford Works under the supervision of the newly-created Atomic Energy Commission. As the Cold War began, the United States faced a new strategic threat in the rise of the Soviet nuclear weapons program. In August 1947, the Hanford Works announced funding for the construction of two new weapons reactors and research leading to the development of a new chemical separations process. With this announcement, Hanford entered a new phase of expansion.[34]

By 1963, the Hanford Site was home to nine nuclear reactors along the Columbia River, five reprocessing plants on the central plateau, and more than 900 support buildings and radiological laboratories around the site. Extensive modifications and upgrades were made to the original three World War II reactors, and a total of 177 underground waste tanks were built.[2] Hanford was at its peak production from 1956 to 1965. Over the entire 40 years of operations, the site produced about 63 short tons (57 t) of plutonium, supplying the majority of the 60,000 weapons in the U.S. arsenal.[2][3]

Decommissioning

With an average individual life span of 22 years, most of the reactors were shut down between 1964 and 1971. The last reactor, the N-reactor, continued to operate as a dual-purpose reactor, being both a power reactor used to feed the civilian electrical grid via the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) and a plutonium production reactor for nuclear weapons. The N-Reactor operated until 1987. Since then, most of the Hanford reactors have been entombed ("cocooned") to allow the radioactivity to decay, and the surrounding structures have been removed and buried.[35] The B-Reactor has not been cocooned and is accessible to the public on occasional guided tours. It was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1992,[36] and some historians advocate converting it into a museum.[37]

Weapons Production Reactors[38]
Reactor name Start-up date Shutdown date Initial power (MWt) Final power (MWt)
B-Reactor September 1944 February 1968 250 2210
D-Reactor December 1944 June 1967 250 2165
F-Reactor February 1945 June 1965 250 2040
H-Reactor October 1949 April 1965 400 2140
DR-Reactor October 1950 December 1964 250 2015
C-Reactor November 1952 April 1969 650 2500
KW-Reactor January 1955 February 1970 1800 4400
KE-Reactor April 1955 January 1971 1800 4400
N-Reactor December 1963 January 1987 4000 4000

Contemporary Hanford

Highway sign on a road entering the Hanford Site

The United States Department of Energy assumed control of the Hanford Site in 1977. Although uranium enrichment and plutonium breeding were slowly phased out, the nuclear legacy left an indelible mark on the Tri-Cities. Since World War II, the area had developed from a small farming community to a booming "Atomic Frontier" to a powerhouse of the nuclear-industrial complex.[39] Decades of federal investment created a community of highly skilled scientists and engineers. As a result of this concentration of specialized skills, the Hanford site was able to diversify its operations to include scientific research, test facilities, and commercial nuclear power production.

Some of the facilities currently located at the Hanford Site:

Environmental concerns

The Hanford Reach of the Columbia River, where radioactivity was released from 1944 to 1971

The Hanford reactors required a huge volume of water from the Columbia River to dissipate the heat produced by the nuclear reactions. From 1944 to 1971, pump systems drew cooling water from the river and, after treating this water for use by the reactors, returned it to the river. Before being released back into the river, the used water was held in large tanks known as retention basins for up to six hours. Longer-lived isotopes were not affected by this retention, and several terabecquerels entered the river every day. By 1957, the eight plutonium production reactors at Hanford dumped a daily average of 50,000 curies of radioactive material into the Columbia.[40] These releases were kept secret by the federal government. Radiation was later measured downstream as far west as the Washington and Oregon coasts.[4][41]

The plutonium separation process also resulted in the release of radioactive isotopes into the air, which were carried by the wind throughout southeastern Washington and into parts of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and British Columbia.[4] Downwinders were exposed to radionuclides, particularly iodine-131, with the heaviest releases during the period from 1945 to 1951. These radionuclides filtered into the food chain via contaminated fields where milk cows grazed; hazardous fallout was ingested by communities who consumed the radioactive food and drank the milk. Most of these airborne releases were a part of Hanford's routine operations, while a few of the larger releases occurred in isolated incidents. In 1949, an intentional release known as the "Green Run" released 8,000 curies of iodine-131 over two days.[42] Another source of contaminated food came from Columbia River fish, an impact felt disproportionately by Native American communities who depended on the river for their customary diets.[4]

Beginning in the 1960s, scientists with the U.S. Public Health Service published reports about radioactivity released from Hanford, and there were protests from the health departments of Oregon and Washington. By February 1986, mounting citizen pressure forced the Department of Energy to release to the public 19,000 pages of previously unavailable historical documents about Hanford’s operations.[4] The Washington State Department of Health collaborated with the citizen-led Hanford Health Information Network (HHIN) to publicize data about the health effects of Hanford’s operations. HHIN reports concluded that residents who lived downwind from Hanford or who used the Columbia River downstream were exposed to elevated doses of radiation that placed them at increased risk for various cancers and other diseases.[4] A class-action lawsuit brought by two thousand Hanford Downwinders against the federal government has been in the court system for many years. The first six plaintiffs went to trial in 2005, in a bellwether trial to test the legal issues applying to the remaining plaintiffs in the suit.[43]

Cleanup era

Image of the surface of waste found inside double-shell tank 101-SY at the Hanford Site, April 1989
Grand opening of the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF)

In 1989, the Washington Department of Ecology, the federal Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Energy entered into the Tri-Party Agreement, which provides a legal framework for environmental remediation at Hanford.[8] The agencies are currently engaged in the world's largest environmental cleanup, with many challenges to be resolved in the face of overlapping technical, political, regulatory, and cultural interests. The cleanup effort is focused on three outcomes: restoring the Columbia River corridor for other uses, converting the central plateau to long-term waste treatment and storage, and preparing for the future.[44] The cleanup effort is managed by the Department of Energy under the oversight of the two regulatory agencies. A citizen-led Hanford Advisory Board provides recommendations from community stakeholders, including local and state governments, regional environmental organizations, business interests, and Native American tribes. [45]

While major releases of radioactive material ended with the reactor shutdown in the 1970s, parts of the Hanford site remain heavily contaminated. Many of the most dangerous wastes are contained, but there are concerns about contaminated groundwater headed toward the Columbia River. There are also continued concerns about workers' health and safety.

Examples of the scale of the problem are:

  • Some 53 million U.S. gallons (204,000 m³) of high-level radioactive waste is stored in 177 underground tanks, about a third of which have leaked waste into the soil and groundwater.[46] As of 2008, most of the liquid wastes have been transferred to more secure double-shelled tanks; however, 2.8 million US gallons (10,599 m³) of liquid waste, together with 27 million US gallons (102,206 m³) of salt cake and sludge, remains in the single-shelled tanks.[5]
  • Nearby aquifers contain an estimated 270 billion US gallons (1 billion m³) of contaminated groundwater.[47] As of 2008, 1 million US gallons (3,785 m³) of highly radioactive waste is traveling through groundwater toward the Columbia River. This waste is expected to reach the river in 12 to 50 years if cleanup does not proceed on schedule.[5]
  • The site includes 25 million cubic feet (707,921 m³) of solid radioactive waste.[47]

Under the Tri-Party Agreement, lower-level hazardous wastes are buried in huge lined pits that will be sealed and monitored with sophisticated instruments for many years. The tanks filled with high-level nuclear waste and highly toxic chemicals pose a much more difficult problem. As an example, plutonium has a half-life of 24,100 years, and a decay of ten half-lives is required before a sample is considered to be safe.[48] Disposal of plutonium and other high-level wastes is a difficult problem that continues to be a subject of intense debate.[49] The Department of Energy is currently building a vitrification plant on the Hanford site. Vitrification is a method that will combine these dangerous wastes with glass to render them stable. Bechtel, the San Francisco based construction and engineering firm, has been hired to construct the Vit Plant, which is currently estimated to cost approximately $12 billion. Construction began in 2001. After some delays, the plant is scheduled to be operational in 2019.[50]

The federal government currently spends about $2 billion a year on the Hanford project.[51] Cleanup to a nationally accepted level will likely take until at least 2030 and cost at least $50 billion total.[52] About 11,000 workers are on site to consolidate, clean up, and mitigate waste, contaminated buildings, and contaminated soil, though this number fluctuates somewhat based on current cleanup tasks and construction projects.[5]

Photo gallery

References

  1. ^ U.S. Department of Energy. "B Reactor". Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  2. ^ a b c d e U.S. Department of Energy. "Hanford Site: Hanford Overview". Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  3. ^ a b "Science Watch: Growing Nuclear Arsenal". The New York Times. 28 April 1987. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Hanford Health Information Network. "An Overview of Hanford and Radiation Health Effects". Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  5. ^ a b c d Washington Department of Ecology. "Hanford Quick Facts". Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  6. ^ Harden, Blaine (2 June 2007). "Debate Intensifies on Nuclear Waste". Washington Post. pp. A02. Retrieved 2007-01-29. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ Dininny, Shannon (3 April 2007). "U.S. to Assess the Harm from Hanford". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. The Associated Press. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  8. ^ a b Schneider, Keith (28 February 1989). "Agreement for a Cleanup at Nuclear Site". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-01-30.
  9. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.12. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  10. ^ Seelye, Katharine (10 June 2000). "Gore Praises Move to Aid Salmon Run". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  11. ^ Columbia Riverkeepers. "Site Map Area and Description". Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  12. ^ Lewis, Mike (19 April 2002). "In strange twist, Hanford cleanup creates latest boom". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  13. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.12. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  14. ^ Hanford Island Archaeological Site (NRHP #76001870) and Hanford North Archaeological District (NHRP #76001871). "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. 2007-01-23.
  15. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.12. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  16. ^ Gerber, Michele (2002). On the Home Front: The Cold War Legacy of the Hanford Nuclear Site (2nd Ed. ed.). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. p. 16–22. ISBN 0803271018. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)
  17. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.10. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  18. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.12. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  19. ^ Gerber, Michele (1992). Legend and Legacy: Fifty Years of Defense Production at the Hanford Site. Richland, Washington: Westinghouse Hanford Company. p. 6.
  20. ^ Franklin, Matthias (14 January 1987). "Hanford Engineer Works, Manhattan Engineer District: Early History". Speech to the Technical Exchange Program. {{cite conference}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |1= and |2= (help); Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  21. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.12. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  22. ^ Thayer, H. (1996). Management of the Hanford Engineer Works in World War II. New York, NY: American Society of Civil Engineers Press.
  23. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.21–1.23. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  24. ^ Gerber, Michele (2002). On the Home Front: The Cold War Legacy of the Hanford Nuclear Site (2nd Ed. ed.). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. p. 35–36. ISBN 0803271018. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)
  25. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.15, 1.30. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  26. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.22–1.27. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  27. ^ Findlay, John (1995). Nuclear Technologies and Nuclear Communities: A History of Hanford and the Tri-Cities, 1943-1993. Seattle, WA. p. 50. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  28. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.27. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  29. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.22. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  30. ^ Groves, Leslie (1983). Now It Can Be Told: The Story of the Manhattan Project. New York, NY: Da Capo Press. p. xv.
  31. ^ Sanger, S. L. Working on the Bomb: an Oral History of WWII Hanford. Portland, Oregon: Continuing Education Press, Portland State University. p. 70.
  32. ^ Sanger, S. L. Working on the Bomb: an Oral History of WWII Hanford. Portland, Oregon: Continuing Education Press, Portland State University. p. interview with Generaux.
  33. ^ Hanford Cultural Resources Program, U.S. Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943-1990. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. p. 1.42–45. ISBN 1-57477-133-7.
  34. ^ City of Richland. "Cocooning Hanford Reactors". Retrieved 2008-01-31.
  35. ^ NRHP site 92000245. "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. 2007-01-23.
  36. ^ B Reactor Museum Association. "B-Reactor Museum Association". Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  37. ^ U.S. Department of Energy. "Plutonium: the first 50 years: United States plutonium production, acquisition, and utilization from 1944 through 1994". Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  38. ^ Hevly, Bruce (1998). The Atomic West. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  39. ^ Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility. "Hanford History". Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  40. ^ "Radiation Flowed 200 Miles to Sea, Study Finds". The New York Times. 17 July 1992. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  41. ^ Gerber, Michele (2002). On the Home Front: The Cold War Legacy of the Hanford Nuclear Site (2nd Ed. ed.). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. p. 78–80. ISBN 0803271018. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)
  42. ^ McClure, Robert (21 May 2005). "Downwinders' court win seen as 'great victory'". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  43. ^ U.S. Department of Energy (October 2007). "Hanford Site Tour Script" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  44. ^ U.S. Department of Energy. "Hanford Site: Hanford Advisory Board". Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  45. ^ Wald, Matthew (16 January 1998). "Panel Details Management Flaws at Hanford Nuclear Waste Site". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  46. ^ a b Wolman, David (April 2007). "Fission Trip". Wired Magazine. p. 78.
  47. ^ Hanson, Laura A. (November 2000). "Radioactive Waste Contamination of Soil and Groundwater at the Hanford Site" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-01-31. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  48. ^ Gephart, Roy (2003). Hanford: A Conversation About Nuclear Waste and Cleanup. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. ISBN 1-57477-134-5.
  49. ^ Dininny, Shannon (8 September 2006). "Hanford plant now $12.2 billion". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  50. ^ Aaker, Grant, and Josh Wallaert (2007). Arid Lands (DVD). Bullfrog Films.
  51. ^ Montaigne, Fen (April 2001). "A River Damned". National Geographic. p. 24–25.

External links