User contributions for Eaterjolly
A user with 400 edits. Account created on 12 August 2009.
30 September 2018
- 00:4100:41, 30 September 2018 diff hist +2 m User talk:Flyer22 Frozen →Perhaps you might already feel sick of my "contributions" by now, but: you could say every endeavor or imposed standard is a kind of conflict. let me clarify: drama. I seketh naught any of the drama!
- 00:3700:37, 30 September 2018 diff hist +16 m User talk:Flyer22 Frozen →Perhaps you might already feel sick of my "contributions" by now, but: clarification
- 00:3500:35, 30 September 2018 diff hist −234 User talk:Flyer22 Frozen →Perhaps you might already feel sick of my "contributions" by now, but: trimming
- 00:2100:21, 30 September 2018 diff hist −262 User talk:Flyer22 Frozen →Perhaps you might already feel sick of my "contributions" by now, but: unnecessary justification
- 00:1600:16, 30 September 2018 diff hist +12 m User talk:Flyer22 Frozen →Perhaps you might already feel sick of my "contributions" by now, but
- 00:1400:14, 30 September 2018 diff hist +2,043 User talk:Flyer22 Frozen →Perhaps you might already feel sick of my "contributions" by now, but: I'm a pretty little snowflake
29 September 2018
- 10:4410:44, 29 September 2018 diff hist −2 m User talk:Eaterjolly →Village pump proposal: fixed grammar
- 10:4410:44, 29 September 2018 diff hist +931 User talk:Eaterjolly →Village pump proposal: new section
- 00:2300:23, 29 September 2018 diff hist +6 m User talk:Floquenbeam →About that Village Pump proposal: not enough emphasis
- 00:2300:23, 29 September 2018 diff hist −2 m User talk:Floquenbeam →About that Village Pump proposal: too much emphasis
- 00:2200:22, 29 September 2018 diff hist +940 User talk:Floquenbeam →About that Village Pump proposal: new section
- 00:0500:05, 29 September 2018 diff hist −1 m User talk:Eaterjolly →September 2018: syntax error
- 00:0400:04, 29 September 2018 diff hist +20 m User talk:Eaterjolly →September 2018: striking regret-able statements.
- 00:0200:02, 29 September 2018 diff hist +450 m User talk:Eaterjolly uh the notice should probably stay for historical reasons. My bad.
28 September 2018
- 23:5923:59, 28 September 2018 diff hist −1,874 User talk:Eaterjolly Thank You : ) *offers editor a hug* oops I violated WP:NOLOVE, is that block-able offense?
- 22:4222:42, 28 September 2018 diff hist +481 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Eaterjolly: Comment.
- 22:2222:22, 28 September 2018 diff hist +179 User talk:Flyer22 Frozen →Perhaps you might already feel sick of my "contributions" by now, but: Help
- 22:1622:16, 28 September 2018 diff hist +5 User talk:Eaterjolly →September 2018: emphasis on the main point.
- 22:1522:15, 28 September 2018 diff hist +1 m User talk:Eaterjolly No edit summary
- 22:1522:15, 28 September 2018 diff hist −1 m User talk:Eaterjolly No edit summary
- 22:1322:13, 28 September 2018 diff hist 0 m User talk:Eaterjolly No edit summary
- 22:1322:13, 28 September 2018 diff hist +790 User talk:Eaterjolly →September 2018: Absurd.
- 21:3821:38, 28 September 2018 diff hist −691 m Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.: Drop what? No one has even commented on a single statement I've said. Give me a substantive reason why you believe my points wrong.
- 21:3421:34, 28 September 2018 diff hist +584 User talk:Flyer22 Frozen →Perhaps you might already feel sick of my "contributions" by now, but: new section
- 21:1921:19, 28 September 2018 diff hist −416 m Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) Undid revision 861633286 by Kirbanzo (talk) Please make a more substantive criticism. Please counter my argument that the policy change I have proposed doesn't reflect the already current standard practice on wikipedia. If you mean the neutrality pillar, then including otherwise unreliable sources under conditional circumstance neither shakes that pillar nor seems all that radical. I'm just saying what everone's thought but no one's said. Tag: Undo
- 20:0120:01, 28 September 2018 diff hist +10 m Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.: explanations for otherwise contradictory behavior reported as fact by otherwise rigorous tertiary sources. That's what I meant with this line.
- 19:5319:53, 28 September 2018 diff hist +4 m Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.: Added bullets for read-ability.
- 19:5219:52, 28 September 2018 diff hist +378 Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.: Comment on reversing the discussion archival.
- 19:4819:48, 28 September 2018 diff hist +3,028 Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.: IMO a very effective argument for why "reliability" shouldn't form the end all for judging sources.
- 10:0410:04, 28 September 2018 diff hist +389 Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.
- 09:5309:53, 28 September 2018 diff hist +18 Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.
- 09:5209:52, 28 September 2018 diff hist +138 Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.
- 09:4909:49, 28 September 2018 diff hist +11 Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.
- 09:4809:48, 28 September 2018 diff hist +1,202 Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) →Wikipedia, a quatertiary source.: new section
27 September 2018
- 06:4706:47, 27 September 2018 diff hist +261 User talk:Maplestrip →If the typesetting in infoboxes has ever annoyed you...: new section
24 September 2018
- 05:2905:29, 24 September 2018 diff hist +2 m User talk:Maplestrip →Does Lusus (Homestuck) deserve an article?: formatting
- 04:3704:37, 24 September 2018 diff hist −6 m User talk:Maplestrip →Does Lusus (Homestuck) deserve an article?: grammar
- 04:3604:36, 24 September 2018 diff hist 0 m User talk:Maplestrip →Does Lusus (Homestuck) deserve an article?
- 04:3504:35, 24 September 2018 diff hist +712 User talk:Maplestrip →Does Lusus (Homestuck) deserve an article?: new section
22 September 2018
- 15:2315:23, 22 September 2018 diff hist +371 Talk:Suicide →RfC: Neutrality Challenged
- 14:4214:42, 22 September 2018 diff hist +8 m Talk:Macrophilia/to do No edit summary
- 04:3204:32, 22 September 2018 diff hist +112 Talk:Macrophilia/to do Added todo: relate Macrophilia with artistic depictions of giants as well as tinies.
- 04:2604:26, 22 September 2018 diff hist −7 Talk:Macrophilia/to do More realistic todos, imo. Feel free to modify further or revert.
20 September 2018
- 04:1804:18, 20 September 2018 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts →Determining if Talk:Macrophilia falls within scope: formatting
- 04:1804:18, 20 September 2018 diff hist +517 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts →Determining if Talk:Macrophilia falls within scope: new section
- 04:0004:00, 20 September 2018 diff hist −104 Talk:Macrophilia →Move Article?: The Ontology of Macrophilia.
18 September 2018
- 02:0802:08, 18 September 2018 diff hist +10 m Talk:Macrophilia →Move Article?: ontological clarification
- 02:0502:05, 18 September 2018 diff hist +1,274 Talk:Macrophilia →Move Article?: Comments about macrophilia's meaning, as well as how to interpret reliable sources that try to describe that meaning.
17 September 2018
- 12:0512:05, 17 September 2018 diff hist +4 m Talk:Suicide →RfC: Neutrality Challenged: emphasis
- 12:0412:04, 17 September 2018 diff hist +242 Talk:Suicide →RfC: Neutrality Challenged: Moral not a Topic. Hopefully final comment.
