User contributions for Jannikp97
A user with 289 edits. Account created on 23 October 2022.
19 May 2024
- 13:4113:41, 19 May 2024 diff hist −184 Instant-runoff voting I am not sure this similar procedure actually exists (or is relevant here)
18 May 2024
- 07:0807:08, 18 May 2024 diff hist +526 Talk:Round-robin voting →Is This Page Original Research?: Reply Tag: Reply
17 May 2024
- 18:2018:20, 17 May 2024 diff hist −836 Score voting →Strategy: Does not seem relevant here current
- 18:1818:18, 17 May 2024 diff hist −398 Score voting →Political use: Unsourced statement
- 18:1718:17, 17 May 2024 diff hist −210 Score voting Has maybe 10 hits on google with a substantial portion of them being from this article (or derivations)
- 18:1518:15, 17 May 2024 diff hist −1,231 STAR voting →Properties: Dont really think that these personal ``fights'' belong here. current
- 18:0918:09, 17 May 2024 diff hist +47 Droop quota I am not too sure CPO-STV is a good example here (EAR is not the best either tbf)
- 05:5305:53, 17 May 2024 diff hist +309 Talk:Ranked pairs →The river method is not a variant of ranked pairs.: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 05:5205:52, 17 May 2024 diff hist −1 m Ranked pairs →Procedure current
- 05:5105:51, 17 May 2024 diff hist −832 Ranked pairs The River variant is WP:OR, not published anywhere, I would not really mention it here unless it gets published somehwere
15 May 2024
- 19:5319:53, 15 May 2024 diff hist −1 m Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Descending solid coalitions No edit summary
- 19:5319:53, 15 May 2024 diff hist +270 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Descending solid coalitions →Descending solid coalitions: Reply Tag: Reply
13 May 2024
- 17:4817:48, 13 May 2024 diff hist −310 Ben Ferguson WP:BLPSPS
9 May 2024
- 20:3520:35, 9 May 2024 diff hist −131 Copeland's method →History: Dont think this is relevant enough
- 20:1820:18, 9 May 2024 diff hist −565 Rachel Brosnahan →Early life: WP:BLPSPS
- 20:1720:17, 9 May 2024 diff hist −515 Anthony Edwards (actor) →Early life: WP:BLPSPS
- 20:1620:16, 9 May 2024 diff hist −131 Anthony Edwards (actor) →Early life: WP:BLP
- 20:1520:15, 9 May 2024 diff hist −269 Shahnaz Husain WP:BLPSPS current
- 20:1320:13, 9 May 2024 diff hist −65 Angela Kinsey →Early years: WP:BLP
- 20:1320:13, 9 May 2024 diff hist −373 Angela Kinsey WP:BLPSPS
- 20:1020:10, 9 May 2024 diff hist −1,003 Karthik (actor) →Debut and success (1981–1986): WP:BLPSPS
- 20:0620:06, 9 May 2024 diff hist −30 Thierry Baudet Not a voting theorist
- 08:2408:24, 9 May 2024 diff hist +200 User talk:Affinepplan →May 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:3607:36, 9 May 2024 diff hist +198 Talk:Later-no-harm criterion →This article needs serious revision: Reply Tag: Reply
8 May 2024
- 17:4717:47, 8 May 2024 diff hist −1,286 Social utility efficiency →History: All of this is WP:OR/not very reliable sourcing current
- 17:4517:45, 8 May 2024 diff hist +3 m Sincere favorite criterion No edit summary
- 17:4517:45, 8 May 2024 diff hist −294 Sincere favorite criterion WP:SPS
- 17:4417:44, 8 May 2024 diff hist −933 Sincere favorite criterion →Compliant methods: WP:SPS
- 17:3217:32, 8 May 2024 diff hist −36 Condorcet winner criterion →Score voting: unfinished sentence
- 17:3117:31, 8 May 2024 diff hist −95 Condorcet winner criterion →Instant-runoff voting
- 17:3017:30, 8 May 2024 diff hist −491 Condorcet winner criterion →Instant-runoff voting: This is not a source I would trust on that statement
- 17:2917:29, 8 May 2024 diff hist −1,377 Condorcet winner criterion →Rated voting: Do not think any of this belongs here, further it is unsourced.
- 17:2817:28, 8 May 2024 diff hist +10 Condorcet winner criterion →By method
- 17:2817:28, 8 May 2024 diff hist −27 Condorcet winner criterion →Pass: If you include Ranked Pairs, then tournament solutions include weighted tournaments, which makes this statement obviously wrong.
- 17:2617:26, 8 May 2024 diff hist −821 Condorcet winner criterion →Stability (no-weak-spoilers): The only hit for this property is this article so WP:OR
- 17:2417:24, 8 May 2024 diff hist −2 Condorcet winner criterion →Stability (no-weak-spoilers)
- 17:2317:23, 8 May 2024 diff hist −164 Condorcet winner criterion That sentence does not seem right to me. Also technically Ranked Pairs is not a tournament solution.
7 May 2024
- 20:3320:33, 7 May 2024 diff hist −4 m Droop quota More standard term
6 May 2024
- 07:3807:38, 6 May 2024 diff hist +404 Talk:Sincere favorite criterion →Maybe Merge with Strategic Voting: new section Tag: New topic
4 May 2024
- 18:3318:33, 4 May 2024 diff hist −705 Rated voting →Variants: Sources not really relevant here current
- 16:0616:06, 4 May 2024 diff hist −2,136 Later-no-harm criterion Cleaned the intro of unsubstantiated claims Tag: Reverted
- 16:0016:00, 4 May 2024 diff hist +453 Talk:Later-no-harm criterion →This article needs serious revision: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5515:55, 4 May 2024 diff hist −26,779 Later-no-harm criterion →Examples: too many examples to not really relevant rules...
- 15:2815:28, 4 May 2024 diff hist +312 Talk:Rated voting →Real-world examples?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:1015:10, 4 May 2024 diff hist −1 m Phragmen's voting rules →Computation: spacing current
- 07:4007:40, 4 May 2024 diff hist +264 Talk:Rated voting →Renaming of Page: Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:3907:39, 4 May 2024 diff hist −750 Rated voting →Relationship to rankings: Both rangevoting.org and the electowiki are not good enough sources. They are self-published WP:SPS and especially the rangevoting site does not seem reliable. There being an Arxiv paper does not really change it WP:ARXIV, please discuss Talk:Rated voting if you want to revert again. Tag: Manual revert
3 May 2024
- 18:4618:46, 3 May 2024 diff hist −706 Rated voting →Relationship to rankings: Both original research WP:OR and WP:SPS Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 18:2418:24, 3 May 2024 diff hist −1,261 Instant-runoff voting →Tactical voting: I do not think these experiments are up to modern standard, it is quite unclear how and if they translate to any real world scenarios (especially since this paper also uses Impartial Culture)
- 18:2118:21, 3 May 2024 diff hist −386 Instant-runoff voting →Tactical voting: I don't think it appears in that article
- 18:1818:18, 3 May 2024 diff hist +6 m Instant-runoff voting →Terminology
1 May 2024
- 20:0620:06, 1 May 2024 diff hist +6 Strategic voting →Common types of strategic voting: Does it say that?
- 20:0220:02, 1 May 2024 diff hist −88 Strategic voting While I agree that IRV should not be removed, see some page containing original research on some obscure wiki is not really a good reason
- 20:0120:01, 1 May 2024 diff hist −18 Spoiler effect Nothing really there to support the "frequent"
28 April 2024
- 20:4020:40, 28 April 2024 diff hist +22 Proportionality for solid coalitions The Tideman paper also fits.
- 20:3720:37, 28 April 2024 diff hist +34 Proportionality for solid coalitions Added proper citation
27 April 2024
- 21:2021:20, 27 April 2024 diff hist −80 Arrow's impossibility theorem Do not think this belongs there (is relevant to the article)
- 19:5619:56, 27 April 2024 diff hist +4 m Spoiler effect →Tournament (Condorcet) voting
- 19:5519:55, 27 April 2024 diff hist +195 Spoiler effect →Runoff systems: Gave justification for better source needed
- 19:5319:53, 27 April 2024 diff hist +40 m Spoiler effect →Runoff systems
- 19:5219:52, 27 April 2024 diff hist +40 m Spoiler effect →Plurality voting
- 19:5019:50, 27 April 2024 diff hist −246 Spoiler effect WP:SPS I do not think this book is a good enough source for Wikipedia
- 19:0619:06, 27 April 2024 diff hist 0 m Spoiler effect Capitalization
- 19:0619:06, 27 April 2024 diff hist −10 m Spoiler effect spelling
- 19:0519:05, 27 April 2024 diff hist −47 Spoiler effect Not sure IRV actually frequently suffers from spoilers
- 19:0219:02, 27 April 2024 diff hist +184 m Spoiler effect fixed ref
- 19:0119:01, 27 April 2024 diff hist −201 Spoiler effect Source contains no mention of arrow
- 09:3409:34, 27 April 2024 diff hist −253 Election science Despite their name this does not really seem appropiate here
26 April 2024
- 21:1521:15, 26 April 2024 diff hist −240 Unified primary →Oregon: WP:SPS current
- 21:1321:13, 26 April 2024 diff hist −1,072 Unified primary →Oregon: Dont think this information is relevant enough
- 21:1221:12, 26 April 2024 diff hist −614 Unified primary →Oregon: Does not seem like relevant information
- 21:1021:10, 26 April 2024 diff hist +407 Unified primary →Analysis: added appropiate citation for that fact
- 21:0421:04, 26 April 2024 diff hist −889 Unified primary →Analysis: The first part of the paragraph is just original research...
- 21:0021:00, 26 April 2024 diff hist −510 Unified primary →Analysis: I do not think these youtube videos are appropiate sources for wikipedia
- 20:5820:58, 26 April 2024 diff hist −212 Unified primary Link does not exist as well
- 20:5720:57, 26 April 2024 diff hist −283 Unified primary Link does not exist
22 April 2024
- 09:4409:44, 22 April 2024 diff hist −1,231 Condorcet method ``Usually'' carries too much weight here (and I do not think it is appropiate for the introduction here)
21 April 2024
- 18:0818:08, 21 April 2024 diff hist −137 Quota rule →Relation to apportionment paradoxes: WP:SPS current
- 18:0718:07, 21 April 2024 diff hist 0 m Largest remainders method →Pros and cons
- 18:0618:06, 21 April 2024 diff hist −172 Largest remainders method →Pros and cons: WP:SPS
- 18:0418:04, 21 April 2024 diff hist −430 Strategic voting →Approval voting: WP:SPS
- 10:0910:09, 21 April 2024 diff hist −231 Score voting →Strategy: Page does not exist
- 10:0610:06, 21 April 2024 diff hist −189 Cleo Fields →1995 Louisiana gubernatorial election: Both of these are WP:BLPSPS Tag: Visual edit: Switched
19 April 2024
- 19:2319:23, 19 April 2024 diff hist −3,182 Comparison of electoral systems →Criterion tables: Started cleaning by deleting all methods without source or filled out rows Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 19:0819:08, 19 April 2024 diff hist −2,313 Proportional representation →Candidate-based systems: That subsection was very confusing and did not really bring anything to the article
- 19:0619:06, 19 April 2024 diff hist −216 m Proportional representation →Proportional approval voting
- 18:5918:59, 19 April 2024 diff hist −30 Multiwinner voting Slightly rephrased current
- 18:5918:59, 19 April 2024 diff hist −682 Multiwinner voting Sorry for undoing the revision. I do not think it fits the spirit of the criterion. For instance in a multiwinner voting setting using scores, selecting the k candidates with the highest score is arguably the "excellence" voting method. However, it is not "majority" based. Undid revision 1219695165 by Rankedchoicevoter (talk) Tag: Undo
- 18:4018:40, 19 April 2024 diff hist −263 Mutual majority criterion →By method: Does not really contribute anything not already mentioned
- 07:5707:57, 19 April 2024 diff hist +1 m Justified representation →Partially cohesive groups: name fixing current
- 07:5307:53, 19 April 2024 diff hist −1,426 Multiwinner voting Seems way out of date.
- 07:5207:52, 19 April 2024 diff hist +45 Multiwinner voting →Proportional elections: added ref to psc
- 07:5107:51, 19 April 2024 diff hist −452 Multiwinner voting →Basic concepts: I think this section is slightly misleading in this context (as for most preferences it is infact very easy to compute a PO committee)
- 07:4907:49, 19 April 2024 diff hist 0 m Multiwinner voting →Approval voting for committees: made consistent
- 07:4707:47, 19 April 2024 diff hist +11 m Multiwinner voting →Approval voting for committees
- 07:4707:47, 19 April 2024 diff hist −1 m Multiwinner voting →Approval voting for committees
- 07:4707:47, 19 April 2024 diff hist 0 m Multiwinner voting →Approval voting for committees
18 April 2024
12 April 2024
- 06:5406:54, 12 April 2024 diff hist +255 Talk:Dodgson's method →Difference from Kemeny-Young?: Reply Tag: Reply
7 April 2024
- 18:2618:26, 7 April 2024 diff hist −3,506 Condorcet paradox →Example: I do not think this example adds much to the article at the current moment. The graphic does not look professional enough and is not really understandable. Further, I do not really see the contribution of this graphic to making the article more understandable (and not just to ``promote'' score voting)
- 18:1618:16, 7 April 2024 diff hist −103 Ephor →Legal power: WP:OR Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 18:1418:14, 7 April 2024 diff hist −217 Hot or Not →History: Unneeded reference to voting Tag: Visual edit
- 18:1218:12, 7 April 2024 diff hist +177 User talk:Jannikp97 →Rangevoting.org/scorevoting.net possible WP:SPS: Reply current Tag: Reply
5 April 2024
- 19:2219:22, 5 April 2024 diff hist +457 Talk:Comparison of electoral systems →Delete the Multiwinner part: new section Tag: New topic
- 13:4013:40, 5 April 2024 diff hist −55 Mutual majority criterion →By method: Deleted empty section
4 April 2024
- 13:4413:44, 4 April 2024 diff hist −450 Bayesian regret Removed section containing original research. current
- 08:4708:47, 4 April 2024 diff hist −33 m Monotonicity criterion Not every method needs to be listed everywhere
- 08:4208:42, 4 April 2024 diff hist −593 Tideman alternative method →Features: This seems too subjective current
- 08:3908:39, 4 April 2024 diff hist +32 STAR voting Most sources here seem to be from an organization promoting this voting method.
- 08:3808:38, 4 April 2024 diff hist −1,262 STAR voting →Properties: Both of these sentences are not true.
- 08:3708:37, 4 April 2024 diff hist +6 STAR voting →Properties
- 08:3608:36, 4 April 2024 diff hist −12 Resolvability criterion Currently no references current
- 08:3008:30, 4 April 2024 diff hist −1 STAR voting →Usage: wording
- 08:2908:29, 4 April 2024 diff hist −6 m STAR voting →Usage: Wrong word I think
- 08:2808:28, 4 April 2024 diff hist −51 STAR voting →Usage: That is not true.
- 08:2508:25, 4 April 2024 diff hist −227 STAR voting Not sure they are notable enough
- 07:1407:14, 4 April 2024 diff hist +149 Copeland's method →Properties: Added needed Citation
- 07:0507:05, 4 April 2024 diff hist −1 Copeland's method round robin is something different
- 07:0307:03, 4 April 2024 diff hist +36 m Ranked voting →History of ranked voting: More standard name
- 06:5606:56, 4 April 2024 diff hist +557 Talk:2009 Burlington mayoral election →Better imperfect source than no source: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:5406:54, 4 April 2024 diff hist 0 m 2009 Burlington mayoral election →Hypothetical results under various voting systems: more standard name
- 06:5306:53, 4 April 2024 diff hist +289 2009 Burlington mayoral election →Hypothetical results under various voting systems: Replaced by more reliable citation
- 06:5106:51, 4 April 2024 diff hist −11 2009 Burlington mayoral election →Hypothetical results under various voting systems: This source does not include this statement. Only that they believe that this might be the case for just two of these rules.
31 March 2024
- 08:5408:54, 31 March 2024 diff hist −1,100 Template:Comparison of voting systems WP:OR
- 08:5308:53, 31 March 2024 diff hist −910 Smith set WP:OR
- 08:5208:52, 31 March 2024 diff hist −4 Template:Comparison of voting systems Do not know anyone who does not call it Copeland. Tag: Disambiguation links added
30 March 2024
- 09:3209:32, 30 March 2024 diff hist −51 Monotonicity criterion Not every method needs to be listed everywhere
29 March 2024
- 13:2913:29, 29 March 2024 diff hist −1,272 Monotonicity criterion →Theoretical models: WP:SPS Besides this, I would try to limit the usage of the Impartial Culture to a minimum. The model is probably the least realistic one you can find.
- 13:2313:23, 29 March 2024 diff hist +118 Monotonicity criterion Added short note on Graha-Squire and McCune
- 13:1513:15, 29 March 2024 diff hist −1,051 Monotonicity criterion →Real-world situations: Firstly, these fall under WP:SPS. Secondly, the methodology both for Australia and Louisiana does not seem very scientific. Therefore, I cannot really support them here. Please do not revert this time.
27 March 2024
- 07:5707:57, 27 March 2024 diff hist −505 Proportional representation →Reweighted range voting: WP:SPS
- 06:5606:56, 27 March 2024 diff hist −215 Arrow's impossibility theorem →Eliminating spoilers: Rated voting: WP:SPS Tag: Reverted
- 06:5506:55, 27 March 2024 diff hist −2,004 Instant-runoff voting WP:SPS
- 06:5206:52, 27 March 2024 diff hist −394 Instant-runoff voting WP:SPS
- 06:5006:50, 27 March 2024 diff hist −372 Instant-runoff voting →Spoiler effect: WP:SPS
- 06:4906:49, 27 March 2024 diff hist −218 Instant-runoff voting WP:SPS
- 05:4705:47, 27 March 2024 diff hist −342 Score voting →Advocacy: Not sure this is of note enough.
- 05:4705:47, 27 March 2024 diff hist −1 m Score voting →Strategy: Space removed
- 05:4605:46, 27 March 2024 diff hist −1,407 Score voting →Strategy: Non of this really seems to be happening/relevant enough for Wikipedia. A few blog discussions does not make a relevant enough story WP:SPS
- 05:4405:44, 27 March 2024 diff hist −1,354 Score voting →Types: All three WP:SPS
- 05:4305:43, 27 March 2024 diff hist −277 Score voting →Types: WP:SPS Citation also makes unsubstantiated claims
- 05:4105:41, 27 March 2024 diff hist −487 Score voting →Types: Both of these are self-published, non expert blog posts [WP:SPS]]
- 05:4005:40, 27 March 2024 diff hist −210 Score voting →Non-political use: WP:SELFPUB Citation not needed here, since already supported by primary source
- 05:3905:39, 27 March 2024 diff hist −130 Score voting →Political use: WP:SPS A self-published blog post is not reliable info on the Republic of Venice
- 05:3805:38, 27 March 2024 diff hist −121 Score voting →Political use: WP:SPS A self-published blog post is not reliable info on ancient Sparta
- 05:3705:37, 27 March 2024 diff hist −208 Score voting WP:SPS
- 05:3605:36, 27 March 2024 diff hist −295 Graduated majority judgment →Race analogy: WP:SPS
26 March 2024
- 20:3220:32, 26 March 2024 diff hist −183 Electoral reform in Vermont →Burlington adoption and repeal of IRV: WP:SPS
- 20:3020:30, 26 March 2024 diff hist −618 Highest median voting rules WP:SPS
- 20:2720:27, 26 March 2024 diff hist +248 Talk:Round-robin voting →Is This Page Original Research?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:2620:26, 26 March 2024 diff hist −1,478 Majority favorite criterion WP:SPS
- 19:4319:43, 26 March 2024 diff hist +18 Expanding approvals rule →Properties: EAR does not actually satisfy cm
- 19:3819:38, 26 March 2024 diff hist +511 Talk:Round-robin voting →Is This Page Original Research?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:3319:33, 26 March 2024 diff hist −650 Vote splitting →Egypt: WP:SPS All three are unreliable blog posts.
- 19:2919:29, 26 March 2024 diff hist −224 Majority judgment →Claimed resistance to tactical voting: WP:SPS
- 19:2919:29, 26 March 2024 diff hist −341 Contingent vote WP:SPS
- 19:2819:28, 26 March 2024 diff hist −1,365 2009 Burlington mayoral election WP:SPS Tag: Reverted
- 19:2419:24, 26 March 2024 diff hist −176 Highest averages method →Quota-capped divisor method: WP:SPS
- 19:2319:23, 26 March 2024 diff hist −542 Combined approval voting →Properties: WP:SPS
- 19:2319:23, 26 March 2024 diff hist −11 Combined approval voting →Procedure: WP:SPS
- 19:1919:19, 26 March 2024 diff hist −289 Graduated majority judgment WP:SPS
- 19:1819:18, 26 March 2024 diff hist −652 Participation criterion Both WP:SPS and original research. Especially the page on the Louisiana election seems very dodgy.
- 19:1519:15, 26 March 2024 diff hist −347 Academy Award for Best Visual Effects →Rules: WP:SPS
- 19:1419:14, 26 March 2024 diff hist −358 Academy Awards →Rules: WP:SPS
- 19:1319:13, 26 March 2024 diff hist −186 Democracy →Greece and Rome: WP:SPS
- 19:1219:12, 26 March 2024 diff hist −69 Proportional representation →External links
- 19:0919:09, 26 March 2024 diff hist −355 Instant-runoff voting →Spoiler effect: WP:SPS
- 19:0819:08, 26 March 2024 diff hist −379 Vote splitting WP:SPS
- 19:0619:06, 26 March 2024 diff hist −756 Spoiler effect →By electoral system: WP:SPS neither rangevoting.org nor minguo.info satisfy the criteria outlined here Tag: Reverted
- 11:4411:44, 26 March 2024 diff hist −712 Electoral system →Comparison of electoral systems: WP:SPS
- 11:4011:40, 26 March 2024 diff hist −281 Impartial culture →Impartial Anonymous Culture (IAC): Source not needed, thus deleted by WP:SPS current
- 11:4011:40, 26 March 2024 diff hist −332 Impartial culture →Impartial Anonymous Culture (IAC): Source not needed, thus deleted by WP:SPS
- 11:3911:39, 26 March 2024 diff hist −180 Multiwinner voting No edit summary
- 11:3811:38, 26 March 2024 diff hist −282 Independence of clones criterion →Compliant methods: WP:SPS
- 11:3711:37, 26 March 2024 diff hist −98 Independence of clones criterion →Voters changing their opinion: WP:SPS
- 11:3411:34, 26 March 2024 diff hist −233 Apportionment paradox WP:SELFPUB
- 11:3211:32, 26 March 2024 diff hist −219 Random ballot →Randomness in other electoral systems: WP:SPS
- 11:3011:30, 26 March 2024 diff hist −167 Ranked-choice voting in the United States →Burlington: WP:SELFPUB
- 11:2511:25, 26 March 2024 diff hist −354 Score voting WP:SELFPUB
- 11:2311:23, 26 March 2024 diff hist −172 Unified primary →Analysis: WP:SELFPUB
- 11:1811:18, 26 March 2024 diff hist −220 Rated voting →Variants: WP:SELFPUB + No other source for this method
- 11:1711:17, 26 March 2024 diff hist −174 Rated voting →Variants: WP:SELFPUB
- 11:1611:16, 26 March 2024 diff hist −888 Rated voting →Variants: WP:SELFPUB
- 11:1511:15, 26 March 2024 diff hist −321 Rated voting →Variants: WP:SELFPUB
- 11:1411:14, 26 March 2024 diff hist −218 Rated voting →Variants: WP:SELFPUB
- 11:1211:12, 26 March 2024 diff hist −208 Sorin Oprescu →Political activity: WP:SELFPUB
23 March 2024
- 17:3317:33, 23 March 2024 diff hist −5 m Spoiler effect →Condorcet methods
- 17:3317:33, 23 March 2024 diff hist −52 m Spoiler effect →Condorcet methods: Incomplete sentence.
- 17:3217:32, 23 March 2024 diff hist −592 Spoiler effect →Weaker forms: I do not think Star Voting is important enough to warrant its own subsection. There is already bloat as is.
- 17:3017:30, 23 March 2024 diff hist −460 Spoiler effect →Rated voting: This is also original research WP:OR
- 17:2917:29, 23 March 2024 diff hist −178 Spoiler effect →Rated voting: That is original research. WP:OR
- 17:2717:27, 23 March 2024 diff hist −18 Spoiler effect Does not seem to support the claim, also WP:SELFPUB
- 17:2217:22, 23 March 2024 diff hist +6 m Spoiler effect No edit summary
- 10:5810:58, 23 March 2024 diff hist +8 m Kalai Prize →Recipients: Added links current
- 08:3208:32, 23 March 2024 diff hist +734 Talk:Monotonicity criterion →State of this article: Reply current Tag: Reply
22 March 2024
- 20:2420:24, 22 March 2024 diff hist +203 Talk:Monotonicity criterion →State of this article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:0318:03, 22 March 2024 diff hist +337 Talk:Monotonicity criterion →State of this article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:4317:43, 22 March 2024 diff hist +6 m Multiwinner approval voting →Example
- 17:1717:17, 22 March 2024 diff hist −199 Score voting →Non-political use: WP:SELFPUB
- 17:1617:16, 22 March 2024 diff hist −3,996 Condorcet method Deleted unreferenced section containing origianal research
- 17:1517:15, 22 March 2024 diff hist −169 Condorcet method →Use of Condorcet voting: WP:SELFPUB
- 17:1417:14, 22 March 2024 diff hist −1,068 STAR voting Deleted section containing exclusively WP:OR
- 17:1117:11, 22 March 2024 diff hist −309 Rated voting →Variants: Source does not exist anymore, also WP:SELFPUB
- 17:0917:09, 22 March 2024 diff hist −7 m Rated voting Fixed bracket
- 17:0917:09, 22 March 2024 diff hist −359 Rated voting WP:SELFPUB
- 15:5215:52, 22 March 2024 diff hist −116 Approval voting →Effect on elections: WP:SELFPUB Also no reason to cite this paper.
- 11:2111:21, 22 March 2024 diff hist −219 Condorcet method →Single-method systems: WP:SELFPUB
- 11:1411:14, 22 March 2024 diff hist −180 Proportional approval voting →History: Source does not contribute anything not already contributed by the earlier two. Also WP:SELFPUB
- 11:1111:11, 22 March 2024 diff hist +1 m Impartial culture →Impartial Anonymous Culture (IAC)
- 08:5408:54, 22 March 2024 diff hist +359 Talk:Monotonicity criterion →State of this article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:1908:19, 22 March 2024 diff hist +958 Talk:Monotonicity criterion →State of this article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:0807:08, 22 March 2024 diff hist +884 Talk:Monotonicity criterion →State of this article: new section Tag: New topic
- 07:0107:01, 22 March 2024 diff hist +560 Talk:Compilation complexity →Merge proposal: Reply Tag: Reply
21 March 2024
- 20:1120:11, 21 March 2024 diff hist −648 m 2012 Egyptian presidential election →Analysis: Not quite sure why these three citations were needed.
- 20:0320:03, 21 March 2024 diff hist −53 m Monotonicity criterion →Quota rules Tag: Reverted
- 20:0220:02, 21 March 2024 diff hist −2,692 m Monotonicity criterion →Frequency of violations: Tried to clean this up. Tag: Reverted
- 19:5819:58, 21 March 2024 diff hist +7 m Monotonicity criterion →Frequency of violations Tag: Reverted
- 19:5519:55, 21 March 2024 diff hist −548 m Monotonicity criterion Changed citation to more appropriate one Tag: Reverted
- 19:5219:52, 21 March 2024 diff hist −9 m Monotonicity criterion →Real-world data Tag: Reverted
- 19:5119:51, 21 March 2024 diff hist +301 Monotonicity criterion Added citation scientific paper studying IRV monotonicity failures Tag: Reverted
- 19:3619:36, 21 March 2024 diff hist −636 Monotonicity criterion Without context, the image is not understandable. Tag: Reverted
- 16:5916:59, 21 March 2024 diff hist +107 Compilation complexity Suggested merge from Compilation Complexity
- 16:5916:59, 21 March 2024 diff hist +103 Summability criterion Suggested merge to Compilation Complexity current
- 16:5816:58, 21 March 2024 diff hist +527 N Talk:Compilation complexity →Merge proposal: new section Tag: New topic
20 March 2024
- 09:4709:47, 20 March 2024 diff hist −210 m Score voting →Strategy: removed unscientific source
- 06:1706:17, 20 March 2024 diff hist −636 m Strategic voting →Score voting: As much as this is an entertaining book, I do not think the validity of these experiments is enough for Wikipedia and might lead to the wrong impression
- 06:0006:00, 20 March 2024 diff hist −685 Monotonicity criterion →Real-world data: The article does not actually find them. The author makes quite drastic assumptions about how the preferences look like and does not use real data. Tag: Reverted
- 05:5705:57, 20 March 2024 diff hist −513 Monotonicity criterion →Real-world data: This does not seem like a scientific source Tag: Reverted
- 05:4905:49, 20 March 2024 diff hist +11 Monotonicity criterion →Frequency of violations Tag: Reverted
19 March 2024
- 06:5706:57, 19 March 2024 diff hist +6 m Comparison of electoral systems →Comparison of multi-winner systems
- 06:5406:54, 19 March 2024 diff hist −1,384 Comparison of electoral systems →Compliance of selected single-winner methods: Deleted column consisting of original research. That criteria does not even have a page.
18 March 2024
- 16:1816:18, 18 March 2024 diff hist +277 Talk:Comparison of electoral systems →Unreliable sources: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:1116:11, 18 March 2024 diff hist −765 m Comparison of electoral systems →Metrics for multi-winner evaluations: Deleted terms only appearing here (original research)
- 06:4406:44, 18 March 2024 diff hist +164 Talk:Round-robin voting →Is This Page Original Research?: Reply Tag: Reply
17 March 2024
- 14:1114:11, 17 March 2024 diff hist +27 Implicit utilitarian voting Article mostly seems
- 14:0814:08, 17 March 2024 diff hist +322 Talk:Social utility efficiency →Merge or at least mention Implicit utilitarian voting: new section current Tag: New topic
- 14:0614:06, 17 March 2024 diff hist −2,263 m Social utility efficiency →History: Removed original research
- 14:0314:03, 17 March 2024 diff hist +262 Talk:Round-robin voting →Is This Page Original Research?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:5513:55, 17 March 2024 diff hist −1,761 m Condorcet winner criterion →Examples: Removed unecessary subsection.
- 13:5213:52, 17 March 2024 diff hist +6 m Condorcet winner criterion →Rated voting
- 13:5113:51, 17 March 2024 diff hist +6 m Condorcet winner criterion →Rated voting
- 13:4513:45, 17 March 2024 diff hist −248 m Droop quota →Confusion with the Hare quota: I do not think a citation from 1913 can tell us something about today.
12 March 2024
- 07:2907:29, 12 March 2024 diff hist +180 Talk:Electoral system →Request: Rewrite categories to follow more standard, four-family classification: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
28 February 2024
- 02:5302:53, 28 February 2024 diff hist +644 N Talk:Round-robin voting →Is This Page Original Research?: new section Tag: New topic
- 02:4902:49, 28 February 2024 diff hist +272 Talk:Rated voting →Renaming of Page: new section Tag: New topic
- 02:4702:47, 28 February 2024 diff hist +363 Talk:Anonymity (social choice) →Merge with "One man, one vote?": Reply current Tag: Reply
- 02:4402:44, 28 February 2024 diff hist +18 m Resolvability criterion Needs citations
25 February 2024
- 05:2005:20, 25 February 2024 diff hist −650 m Vote splitting →Egypt: Removed unreliable secondary sources.
- 01:5101:51, 25 February 2024 diff hist +350 m Participation criterion Replaced citation in intro by more appropiate one
- 01:4501:45, 25 February 2024 diff hist −1,320 Proportional representation →PR electoral systems: Deleted Section looking like original research