Talk:Cirrus cloud: Difference between revisions
nominating for GA |
nominating...with correct parameters |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|Meteorology and atmospheric sciences}} |
{{GA nominee|February 13, 2011|nominator=[[User:Reaper Eternal|Reaper Eternal]] ([[User talk:Reaper Eternal|talk]]) 02:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC)|page=1|subtopic=Meteorology and atmospheric sciences}} |
||
{{Meteorology|class=B|importance=Mid}} |
{{Meteorology|class=B|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{dyktalk|3 February|2011|entry= ... that '''[[cirrus cloud]]s''' ''(pictured with a fire rainbow)'' cover an average of 20% to 25% of the Earth's surface at any time and can produce [[Glory (optical phenomenon)|glories]], [[circumhorizontal arc|fire rainbows]], and [[Sun dog|sundog]]s?}} |
{{dyktalk|3 February|2011|entry= ... that '''[[cirrus cloud]]s''' ''(pictured with a fire rainbow)'' cover an average of 20% to 25% of the Earth's surface at any time and can produce [[Glory (optical phenomenon)|glories]], [[circumhorizontal arc|fire rainbows]], and [[Sun dog|sundog]]s?}} |
Revision as of 02:40, 13 February 2011
Cirrus cloud is currently a Meteorology and atmospheric sciences good article nominee. Nominated by Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC) at February 13, 2011 An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
Weather B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
A fact from Cirrus cloud appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Just a quick note... the link "Earth's Clouds" doesn't exist. Should we replace with just "Clouds"? --12.205.145.117 (talk) 20:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Aviation and climate change
I have recently added a new article on Aviation and climate change which makes reference to cirrus clouds. I would like to add a reference to the new page to this one. I propose something like:
"If there are many cirrus clouds in the sky it may be a sign that a frontal system or upper air disturbance is approaching. Cirrus clouds can also be the remnants of a thunderstorm. A large shield of cirrus and cirrostratus typically accompanies the high altitude outflow of hurricanes/typhoons. Cirrus clouds have been observed to develop after the persistent formation of condensation trails from aircraft (see aviation and climate change)".Normalmouth 21:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Cirrus intortus
Cirrus intortus redirects here, but it is never talked about or even mentioned. The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 01:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- This has been fixed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Inflation
OK, I've now expanded the article 5x. :) Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
There appears to be a typo in the first section, re/ the text "range from 1 ice crystal per 10,000 liters (3 ice crystals per gallon) to 10,000 ice crystals per liter (32,000 ice crystals per gallon)". I think that 1 crystal per 10,000 liters (3 crystals per gallon) is intended to be 1 crystal per liter (3 crystals per gallon). However, 1 gallon is also ~3.78 liters, so the conversion of 3.2 in the second phrase (10,000->32,000) doesn't make much sense, either. I am not implementing these fixes, as I'm not a cirrus-cloud expert, just pointing out the inconsistencies. --Anon/ 3-Feb2011
- Oops! Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Temperature notation
I mentioned this in a text note, but thought it could use a little more discussion. The article uses multiple temperature abbreviations, for example, "This raises the temperature of the lower atmosphere beneath the cirrus clouds by an average of 10 K (18.0 °R)."
In giving temperatures, the "R" abbreviation can mean the Rankine scale or the Réaumur scale. While they're both (little-used) temperature scales, they are distinctly different measures. I found myself scratching my head before I figured out just what was meant; I even thought it might be vandalism and looked around for the edit in which it (the vandalism) was committed. I would suggest some less-ambiguous abbreviation for Rankine (which I eventually figured out was what was meant), such as the "Ra" mentioned in Wikipedia. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- I removed the {{convert}} template and replaced it with 10 Kelvin (18 Rankine). Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Distinctly clearer! I suppose you could, if you like the {{convert}} form, use it after introducing the scales as the article now does... --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)