Talk:Raheja Developers: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:48, 25 April 2017

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raheja Developers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 60 days

Articles for creation Stub‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted on 1 June 2014 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

India Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in February 2015.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in India may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Wikiaccnt1234 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Created article as puff piece here.
Whitewaltham (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Aarvig (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Ncrboy (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Shravanshrvsta (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Rohanpr7 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Shivamtyaagi (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Shravanshrvsta1 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Tunish123 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Jojaf2002 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Powargaurish (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Created article as puff piece here.
Palwalboy (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Bhaskargupta269 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Sanjeev.08 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Sock of Wikiaccnt1234 per SPI.
Mr RD (talk · contribs) has been paid by self on behalf of Kuldeep Chaudhary on behalf of Raheja Developers. Their editing has included contributions to this article. COI declared here.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Leoaugust (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (COI declared here - like many people, real world disputes with Raheja)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Improvements to the Raheja Atharva, Gurgaon section

The Raheja Atharva, Gurgaon is a bit of a mess, with outstanding cite requests, confused chronology and some issues tagged as needing clarification. Furthermore, it does not seem to take account of reports such as this, which appear to indicate that at least some measure of settlement has been achieved in the dispute(s). - Sitush (talk) 15:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And this book might be useful for the Kathputli section. It's usually a good thing to use reliable books rather than news sources, where possible. - Sitush (talk) 16:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The issue of this link in "Hindustan Times" has been discussed earlier on the talk page, and no consensus was achieved on posting it. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Raheja_Developers&diff=next&oldid=724758602 -Leoaugust (talk) 17:10, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. So has anything been settled or not? I can't recall the last time you provided anything about Raheja that was not detrimental to the image of the company, and yet the company, despite all the alleged issues, continues to operate. I know the property world is corrupt everywhere and that India is a country particularly susceptible to corruption, and I also know that Indian legal and other dispute resolution processes are long-winded beyond belief ... but nonetheless something doesn't ring true here. - Sitush (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No updates in the media. All that has been published are Raheja's ads, and sponsored articles in supplements like "HT Estates" & "Times Property." So, it is hard to bring anything on record into Wikipedia. This is a corrupt builder, and not very newsworthy. -Leoaugust (talk) 18:05, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. It's all very strange. - Sitush (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

by above comment/ discussion it reveals that Leoaugust has conflict of Interest against Raheja Developer this is evident from his statement....This is a corrupt builder, and not very newsworthy.

Finally Raheja Developer got huge relief from Punjab and Haryana High Court Civil Writ Petition filed by Atharva Owners Weflare Association vs State of Haryana and others has been dismissed.... https://phhc.gov.in/enq_caseno.php?var1=CM&var2=4653-CWP&var3=2017 . The so called Atharva Owners Welfare Association had fear of dismissal of writ petition, they opted to withdrawn...

Like I said to you an hour or so ago, we can't use court documents. Stop it, please. We've got enough crap on this talk page without you adding more to it. If something is not directly related to improving the article and/or cannot in fact be used to improve it, there is no point raising it. - Sitush (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A balanced version...

I took my time and after evaluating all the sources and WP:WEIGHT(esp. in case of an article where almost all the major contributors have COI one-way or the other), I have heavily edited and trimmed the article. @Sitush and Leoaugust:--Take a look!Winged Blades^Godric 03:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is ok. Thanks for doing that work. Jytdog (talk) 04:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brutal trimming, but I concur. -Leoaugust (talk) 05:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I probably would have retained something about their involvement in the Kathputli affair, which was the only farrago of which I am aware that hit international headlines, but otherwise ok. - Sitush (talk) 08:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sitush, we are not here for personal involvement in the page. By our personal involvement someone else may seek personal benefits. Such things must not be encouraged. we all are just contributing here our thoughts, idea and knowledge. This page seems to be a fight between Leoaugust and other editors with this Raheja Developer, it may be for their mutual gains and growth. My point of view is remove and delete the entire Raheja Developer page.

Apart from this if the contribution is unbiased must be encouraged everyone was new at initial stage. It is all that matters is his contribution — Preceding unsigned comment added by Appmarch (talk • contribs) 09:46, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

One of the things the alleged Raheja contributors have been raising of late is a desire for us to remove their trademarked logo. Now I know that the image was uploaded by someone who claimed to have permission from the company and whom our SPI determined to be pro-Raheja socks, some at least of whom were being paid, but I'm still a bit wary of their claim regarding permission. In any event, we don't actually need the logo - it is more of a courtesy thing to aid identification. Should we remove it and then request deletion of the file as it complies with WP:NFCC but is not in fact used?

This is nothing to do with the numerous threats and wild accusations that have been made. I am not worried about them but I am genuinely dubious regarding the status of the logo. - Sitush (talk) 13:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove and delete:-Per Sitush.Winged Blades^Godric 13:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - then again, the entire point of NFCC is that we don't need permission? Or, at least, the WMF is satisfied that it can host images under the NFCC procedures, regardless of whether or not the uploader might have broken a law in India. I hate trying to work out what happens with images - it's all far too confusing for me. - Sitush (talk) 14:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The comments of single-purpose and/or newly-registered accounts on this talk page are clearly unlikely to be worth consideration. - Sitush (talk) 09:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it is evident from the clarifications of Raheja contributor that logo has been use without their permission same be deleted. Even if Raheja developers page has been create by same one with motive to defame and cause harm be deleted. The policy of the Wikipedia foundation is to share information. The platform is not for misuse and defame anyone — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmsingh2000 (talk • contribs) 08:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree with Sitush, violation of any law whether applicable in India or in any other country must not be allowed on Wikipedia platform. Any thing which has been edited or created without approvals must be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmsingh2000 (talk • contribs) 08:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear from the entire editings on this page that the page of Raheja Developer has been created just for misguiding public at large. Wikipedia is not for uploading day to day business activities of any organization. From all conversations on this talk page it is proved that logo has been used without permission be removed and deleted. What if the entire page of this Developer is removed. I am of view the entire page be removed this Raheja Developer must be using it for its marketing purposes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Appmarch (talk • contribs) 08:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 ::Brutal trimming, but I concur. -[[User:Leoaugust|Leoaugust]] ([[User talk:Leoaugust|talk]]) 05:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 :::I probably would have retained something about their involvement in the Kathputli affair, which was the only farrago of which I am aware that hit international headlines, but otherwise ok. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 08:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
+Hi Sitush, we are not here for personal involvement in the page. By our personal involvement someone else may seek personal benefits. Such things must not be encouraged. we all are just contributing here our thoughts, idea and knowledge. This page seems to be a fight between Leoaugust and other editors with this Raheja Developer, it may be for their mutual gains and growth. My point of view is remove and delete the entire Raheja Developer page.
+Apart from this if the contribution is unbiased must be encouraged everyone was new at initial stage. It is all that matters is his contribution  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Appmarch|Appmarch]] ([[User talk:Appmarch#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Appmarch|contribs]]) 09:46, 25 April 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 == Logo ==