Talk:Insurgency in Balochistan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Freedom Mouse - "→‎Content removal: "
Line 61: Line 61:


The sources do support the content, and how are human rights watch and a mainstream newspaper not reliable? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freedom Mouse|Freedom Mouse]] ([[User talk:Freedom Mouse|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freedom Mouse|contribs]]) 06:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The sources do support the content, and how are human rights watch and a mainstream newspaper not reliable? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Freedom Mouse|Freedom Mouse]] ([[User talk:Freedom Mouse|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Freedom Mouse|contribs]]) 06:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:@[[User:Freedom Mouse|Freedom Mouse]] The so called "newspaper" is from India and giving information from a non reliable person , hence it is unreliable. [[User:FreeatlastChitchat|FreeatlastChitchat]] ([[User talk:FreeatlastChitchat|talk]]) 06:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:19, 9 May 2016


Map

Shouldnt the map also show the conflicted area in Iran? It is only showing the balochistan part of pakistan.Sohebbasharat (talk) 23:58, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. But who will do it and based on what sources? kashmiri TALK 21:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

adding to article

Have made a lot of additions to the article. I use a lot of "according to ..." before telling what was said, and used a lot of quotations. I may make the writing more clunky but I thought it necessary because of the sensitive nature of the topic.

Have also separated info on the conflict in Iran in a separate section. Almost all the article is about the conflict in Pakistan that I thought it would server users better to consolidate the Iran story in one section and add more info to it. -- BoogaLouie (talk) 22:16, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indian involvement

You cannot state, as fact, that India has admitted support for Baloch rebels. I would ask that another editor revert this repeated introduction of inappropriate material. Also, the conflict has not subsided and claiming this is rather silly. Curro2 (talk) 02:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Curro2 did you even read the source which I am using? And the sources clearly states that the attack have largely decreased over the period of time 5.36.5.59 (talk) 02:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop or I will ask that you be blocked. Curro2 (talk) 02:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Balochistan conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content removal

Why is sourced information being removed? The sources support it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedom Mouse (talkcontribs) 05:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Freedom Mouse because the sources do not support the said statements, or sources are not reliable as per WP:RS and sources are not present. Also some of the content has very bad language and was unintelligible. If you have some reliable sources for the content please link them here I will put in the content and attach the citations myself. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sources do support the content, and how are human rights watch and a mainstream newspaper not reliable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedom Mouse (talkcontribs) 06:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Freedom Mouse The so called "newspaper" is from India and giving information from a non reliable person , hence it is unreliable. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]