Talk:Battle honours of South Africa: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:09, 20 October 2023

South Africa: African military history Start‑class Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the African military history task force.

Military history: Culture / African Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	African military history task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle honours of South Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141027123250/http://www.aafonline.co.za/news/south-africa-armed-forces-day-air-force-base-bloemspruit to http://www.aafonline.co.za/news/south-africa-armed-forces-day-air-force-base-bloemspruit

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Current Status of pre-1994 honours

Does anyone know whether the South African government and SANDF accept the pre-1994 honours and allow them to be inscribed on unit colours? Bluenose Gunner (talk) 15:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Current Honours are carried on the Unit Colours. This in spite of the name changs of units. It's a HIGHLY contentious issue. BoonDock (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information.

Is there a reference available (such as a newspaper article) that makes both points (current use and controversy) that we could cite in an addition to this article? Bluenose Gunner (talk) 13:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I find something, I'll let you know.. BoonDock (talk) 02:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ::Thank you for this information.
 ::Is there a reference available (such as a newspaper article) that makes both points (current use and controversy) that we could cite in an addition to this article? [[User:Bluenose Gunner|Bluenose Gunner]] ([[User talk:Bluenose Gunner|talk]]) 13:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
+:::If I find something, I'll let you know.. [[User:BoonDock|BoonDock]] ([[User talk:BoonDock|talk]]) 02:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)