Talk:Kapitza's pendulum

Referral to a figure that doesn't exist

Under the phase portrait section, there is a sentence referring to a figure that is not on the page. While it would be easy to remove this reference, the page itself would benefit greatly from a phase portrait.

"Increasing the amplitude of driving oscillations to half of the pendulum length {\displaystyle a=l/2} a=l/2 leads to the phase portrait shown in the figure."

Lagrangian Derivation

The derivation of the Lagrangian seems to be incorrect. Either I am mistaken, or there should be a negative term: L=m/2 l^2 〖θ'〗^2 +mlgcos(θ)-malv^2sin(θ)sin(vt). The last term is positive in the article right now. Upon checking other calculations of the Kapitza pendulum, it seems this article reaches the same result, but it is unclear in this article whether or not a negative was simply dropped. 198.82.125.252 (talk) 07:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kapitza's pendulum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001191853/http://www.myphysicslab.com/beta/Inverted-pendulum.html to http://www.myphysicslab.com/beta/Inverted-pendulum.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Kapitza wasn't the first to analyze Kapitza pendulum

You can find a proof that a pendulum with a vibrating suspension has a stable upright position in a classic textbook of mathematical methods: Harold Jeffreys and Bertha Swirles Jeffreys. Methods of Mathematical Physics. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 1950. Chap. Solution of Linear Differential Equations of the Second Order, pp. 488–489. Moreover, Kapitza in his paper honestly cites this book. Patulus (talk) 05:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)