Talk:Liz Cohen: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Liz_Cohen This site] has photos and video of Cohen's Bodywork project which aren't available elsewhere on the web. I feel that this provides additional useful information about the project for which the subject is most notable. The site is ''accessible to the reader'' , ''relevant to the content of the article'', likely to ''remain a functional link'' and the information can't be added to the Wikipedia article directly due to copyright issues, [[Wikipedia:EL#What_should_be_linked| therefore it should be in the External links section]]. I have no conflict of interest here, I'm not affiliated with the site in any way. I have considered this link on its merits, using the [[WP:EL|External links guidelines]]. While I am going to re-add this link because I don't doubt the appropriateness of it, I am explaining my reasoning on the article talkpage to solicit comments from other editors. --[[User:Versageek|<span style="color:midnightblue">Versa</span>]][[User_talk:Versageek|<span style="color:darkred">geek</span>]] 19:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
[http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Liz_Cohen This site] has photos and video of Cohen's Bodywork project which aren't available elsewhere on the web. I feel that this provides additional useful information about the project for which the subject is most notable. The site is ''accessible to the reader'' , ''relevant to the content of the article'', likely to ''remain a functional link'' and the information can't be added to the Wikipedia article directly due to copyright issues, [[Wikipedia:EL#What_should_be_linked| therefore it should be in the External links section]]. I have no conflict of interest here, I'm not affiliated with the site in any way. I have considered this link on its merits, using the [[WP:EL|External links guidelines]]. While I am going to re-add this link because I don't doubt the appropriateness of it, I am explaining my reasoning on the article talkpage to solicit comments from other editors. --[[User:Versageek|<span style="color:midnightblue">Versa</span>]][[User_talk:Versageek|<span style="color:darkred">geek</span>]] 19:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
:That reasoning works IMO. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 00:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
:That reasoning works IMO. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 00:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
::*''has photos and video of Cohen's Bodywork project which aren't available elsewhere on the web''. Really? To some other Wiki? Unlike, say: |
|||
::*[http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/reviews/taubman/taubman11-21-06.asp here], |
|||
::*[http://channel.creative-capital.org/grantee_198.html here], |
|||
::*[http://www.fargfabriken.se/gender/index.php?sida=utst&eng=true&bild=2 here], |
|||
::*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fOOqoAgJDs here], or |
|||
::*[http://www.artcritical.com/studiovisit/liz%20cohen/LTCohen.htm here]? |
|||
:Yep, really hard to find. Including that video, which is, you know, the same YouTube video I linked above. |
|||
:It's spam, on behalf of a long-banned spammer. --[[User:Calton|Calton]] | [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 00:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:42, 1 February 2008
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
Link to photos & video of Bodywork project
This site has photos and video of Cohen's Bodywork project which aren't available elsewhere on the web. I feel that this provides additional useful information about the project for which the subject is most notable. The site is accessible to the reader , relevant to the content of the article, likely to remain a functional link and the information can't be added to the Wikipedia article directly due to copyright issues, therefore it should be in the External links section. I have no conflict of interest here, I'm not affiliated with the site in any way. I have considered this link on its merits, using the External links guidelines. While I am going to re-add this link because I don't doubt the appropriateness of it, I am explaining my reasoning on the article talkpage to solicit comments from other editors. --Versageek 19:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)