Talk:Meredith Perry: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
typo
Removed tag
Line 19: Line 19:


:Correct. [[User:WikiEditor020575|WikiEditor020575]] ([[User talk:WikiEditor020575|talk]]) 20:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
:Correct. [[User:WikiEditor020575|WikiEditor020575]] ([[User talk:WikiEditor020575|talk]]) 20:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

== Copyright problem removed ==

[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|32px]] Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/dodgy-technology/spinlaunch-can-it-succeed/150/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, ''unless'' it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see [[WP:COPYRIGHT#Using copyrighted work from others|"using copyrighted works from others"]] if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or [[WP:Donating copyrighted materials|"donating copyrighted materials"]] if you are.)

For [[WP:Copyrights|legal reasons]], we cannot accept [[WP:Copyrights|copyrighted]] text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of ''information'', and, if allowed under [[fair use]], may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and [[WP:CS|referenced]] properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original ''or'' [[WP:Plagiarism|plagiarize]] from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our [[WP:NFC#Text|guideline on non-free text]] for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations '''very seriously''', and persistent violators '''will''' be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. <!-- Template:Cclean --> '''[[User:Dr_vulpes|<span style="background:#4B0082; color:white;">Dr vulpes</span>]]''' [[User talk:Dr_vulpes|(Talk)]] 07:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:39, 12 January 2024


WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
WikiProject iconWomen scientists Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

blogspot souce

Hello all,

I received a warning when making some edits to the page regarding blogspot as a cited source. While I would normally agree that blogs are not good source material the site in question was written by UBeam's former Chief Technology Officer and provides some excellent inside information regarding the innerworkings and news about UBeam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F901:C900:428D:5CFF:FEB0:F473 (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

This page should really address Meredith's controversial statements on engineering. In her TED talk, she explicitly defamed the entire field and made overall unrealistic claims about energy transmission. It is evident her claims were unfounded and scientifically unsound, having wasted millions towards the (unfulfilled) energy transmission promise. An unassuming reader of Wikipedia reaching the current page would end up with a biased self-promoted/vanity picture of this person.

GNG

She appears to meet GNG. And aren't the WP:ABOUTSELF usable for info about her age and career and stuff? Andre🚐 23:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. WikiEditor020575 (talk) 20:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]