Talk:Mewing (orthotropics): Difference between revisions
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
*'''oppose''' per Di, though i'd support a a dab of 'pseudoscience' or 'quackery'—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 19:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
*'''oppose''' per Di, though i'd support a a dab of 'pseudoscience' or 'quackery'—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 19:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
:'''Oppose''' – Mewing is not a "subclass of orthodontics". It ''is'' the common name for the orthotropic worldview in general. Per [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/20/magazine/teeth-mewing-incels.html NY Times]: {{tq|"In 2018, after years in obscurity, orthotropics (rebranded by incels as “mewing”) leapt into the mainstream, the subject of discussion on alternative-health forums and beauty"}}. I'd support leaving it as is, or redirecting to 'Mewing' on its own. [[User:Zenomonoz|Zenomonoz]] ([[User talk:Zenomonoz|talk]]) 23:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:10, 27 April 2024
This article was nominated for deletion on 23 March 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Wiki Education assignment: English Composition 1102
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2024 and 17 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DiceyDomino (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Beefamus.
— Assignment last updated by Beefamus (talk) 16:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 26 April 2024
It has been proposed in this section that Mewing (orthotropics) be renamed and moved to Mewing (orthodontics). A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Mewing (orthotropics) → Mewing (orthodontics) – Judging by our redirect from orthotropics, it seems that the current qualifier is a sub-class of orthodontics associated with (and potentially coined/created by) John Mew. I'm therefore proposing to change the parenthetical disambiguation from orthotropics
to orthodontics
so as to use a more generic class of disambiguator (per point 3 under WP:NCDAB), a likely more commonly known term, and a potentially more neutral qualifier than one strongly associated with one of this technique's creators. All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 10:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Note: I no longer support this page move and am now neutral; see my comments below. [verify] 13:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging Di (they-them), in case you want to take part in this discussion, as you previously moved the page to this title. All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 11:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Personally I would not move it, since orthodontics is a real medical science whereas orthrotropics is a pseudoscience. Mewing isn't backed up by science, so it doesn't feel right to associate it with actual medicine IMO. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's a fair point - I hadn't thought of that. I won't remove the RM tag/close this right now in case any other editors have an opinion, but I'm a fair bit less in favour of moving the page than I was earlier. Thanks for bringing that up :) —a smart kitten[meow] 17:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per WP:RECOGNIZABILITY. RS do seem to describe orthotropics as being within the realm of orthodontics. I don't think using the (orthodontics) disambiguator necessarily implies that it is a legitimate or widely-accepted practice within the field. Colin M (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- (original proposer) Switching to neutral. I think Di raises a good point above. However, I also think the
orthotropics
disambiguator is a bit problematic WP:RECOGNIZABILITY-wise (which was one of my reasons for originally proposing this move), as noted by Colin M. I'm finding myself wondering if there's an alternative parenthetical qualifier that can be used which is more recognizable, but doesn't have issues around potential implications of legitimacy. All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 13:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- oppose per Di, though i'd support a a dab of 'pseudoscience' or 'quackery'—blindlynx 19:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – Mewing is not a "subclass of orthodontics". It is the common name for the orthotropic worldview in general. Per NY Times:
"In 2018, after years in obscurity, orthotropics (rebranded by incels as “mewing”) leapt into the mainstream, the subject of discussion on alternative-health forums and beauty"
. I'd support leaving it as is, or redirecting to 'Mewing' on its own. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC)