Talk:Midwestern University

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 01:11, 9 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Midwestern University/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: InterestGather (talk · contribs) 21:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Passed after some simple corrections, issues generally related to unnecessary commas and unnecessary spaces added after periods.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Occasional original research, I have cleaned it up.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Numerous occasions of unnecessary topics in unrelated sections, one example includes the mention of "no criminal arrests" on the Glendale campus in an unrelated campus. I have corrected this.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Previous edit wars, however due to the decent time passed since their occurrence (over 2 years) I do not believe it is unreasonable to say the conflict has concluded.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    After some necessary corrections, the article fits all six good article criteria, does not meet the immediate fail criteria and therefor will be pushed forward.

Fraternities and clubs[edit]

This passage is largely unsourced; the references are only to other lists and don't convey information of encyclopedic value. The Greek lists are also not exhaustive; the criteria for inclusion here are unclear. The clubs are simply listed but again, this is not the place for lists. I propose deletion. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 06:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one has chimed in on this one, I will go ahead and streamline. --Melchior2006 (talk) 18:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]