Talk:Olvida Peñas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Placing Articles for creation banner (AFCH)
→‎Revelant text: new section
Line 15: Line 15:
:{{tq|'''Reply''' - These citation errors have been fixed.}}
:{{tq|'''Reply''' - These citation errors have been fixed.}}
[[User:Greghenderson2006|Greg Henderson]] ([[User talk:Greghenderson2006#top|talk]]) 16:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[[User:Greghenderson2006|Greg Henderson]] ([[User talk:Greghenderson2006#top|talk]]) 16:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

== Revelant text ==

{{edit COI|pblock=yes}}
Under the '''Historical significance''' section, the following text was removed by an editor:

"The property is historically significant in [[architecture]] as it was designed and built in 1926 by the architect Frederick H. Reimers from Oakland, as one of the only illustrations of Spanish Vernacular architecture on the [[Monterey Peninsula]]. It is also significant in [[Urban planning|community planning]] for its conformity to the community planning structures of the Monterey Peninsula Country Club. To maintain the community character with a country club ambiance, individuals were not allowed to purchase property until elected as members of the club. Further measures were implemented to retain the setting's character, including clauses in deeds requiring company approval for all architectural plans."

I believe it should be added back to the article because it shows why the residence was placed on the [[National Register of Historic Places]]. This text is from the following source: <ref name="NPS">{{cite web |last=Seavey |first=Kent L. |title=National Register of Historic Places Inventory – Nomination Form: Olvida Penas|url=https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/90d4c21d-7ef5-4841-869b-7138e4250f65 |publisher=National Park Service |date=April 3, 1978 |access-date=2024-02-29}}</ref>
{{rlt}} [[User:Greghenderson2006|Greg Henderson]] ([[User talk:Greghenderson2006#top|talk]]) 16:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:23, 27 April 2024

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 27 April 2024 by reviewer ToadetteEdit (talk · contribs).

AfC comments

Below are replies to AfC comments

  • Comment: Not convinced this meets WP:GNG requirements; all but one of the sources look like primary source government documents and records.
Reply- Please see WP:GEOFEAT, "Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable."
  • Comment: Citation errors - one source point to a search engine; another has an incorrect URL that points to a duplicate source rather than the correct publication in the citation text.
Reply - These citation errors have been fixed.

Greg Henderson (talk) 16:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revelant text

Under the Historical significance section, the following text was removed by an editor:

"The property is historically significant in architecture as it was designed and built in 1926 by the architect Frederick H. Reimers from Oakland, as one of the only illustrations of Spanish Vernacular architecture on the Monterey Peninsula. It is also significant in community planning for its conformity to the community planning structures of the Monterey Peninsula Country Club. To maintain the community character with a country club ambiance, individuals were not allowed to purchase property until elected as members of the club. Further measures were implemented to retain the setting's character, including clauses in deeds requiring company approval for all architectural plans."

I believe it should be added back to the article because it shows why the residence was placed on the National Register of Historic Places. This text is from the following source: [1]

References

  1. ^ Seavey, Kent L. (April 3, 1978). "National Register of Historic Places Inventory – Nomination Form: Olvida Penas". National Park Service. Retrieved 2024-02-29.

Greg Henderson (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]