Talk:Pink and blue ribbon: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:55, 3 March 2024

Medicine: Hematology-oncology / Pathology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.
	This article is supported by the Pathology task force.

Formerly a disambig page

I've removed the disambiguation template, as this is no more a disambig page than those for the other advocacy ribbons. Speight (talk) 04:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it should be merged to the List of awareness ribbons. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah (talk) 07:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I propose merging Pink and blue ribbon into List of awareness ribbons.

There really is no need for the pink and blue ribbon to have a seperate entry. There's a few you'd definitely think twice about, say, haphazardly using in your branding, but you'd most likely be quite aware that it's not so much a potential breach of copyright as it is people acting unethically and in bad faith.

Also, it goes without saying that pregnancy loss is a highly contentious topic. However... this is the awareness ribbon associated with pregnancy and infant loss. That usage case covers a father who "lost a child due to abortion" (to quote the previous version of this article, in which this scenario was unnecessarily singled out.) as much as it does the mother. In turn, it denotes her experience as much as that of a grieving husband and wife who are otherwise happily married.

Breast cancer in men and male-bodied people is, I'm sure, an equally contentious discussion. It also would be more appropriately listed as a variation on the existing pink ribbon.

YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah (talk) 07:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :Maybe it should be merged to the [[List of awareness ribbons]].  [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 23:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
+::Agreed. [[User:YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah|YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah]] ([[User talk:YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah|talk]]) 07:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
+== Merge proposal ==
+I propose merging [[Pink and blue ribbon]] into [[List of awareness ribbons]].
+There really is no need for the pink and blue ribbon to have a seperate entry. There's a few you'd definitely think twice about, say, haphazardly using in your branding, but you'd most likely be quite aware that it's not so much a potential breach of copyright as it is people acting unethically and in bad faith.
+Also, it goes without saying that pregnancy loss is a highly contentious topic. However... this is the awareness ribbon associated with ''pregnancy and infant loss''. That usage case covers a father who "lost a child due to abortion" (to quote the previous version of this article, in which this scenario was unnecessarily singled out.) as much as it does the mother. In turn, it denotes her experience as much as that of a grieving husband and wife who are otherwise happily married.
+Breast cancer in men and male-bodied people is, I'm sure, an equally contentious discussion. It also would be more appropriately listed as a variation on the existing pink ribbon.
+[[User:YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah|YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah]] ([[User talk:YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah|talk]]) 07:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)