Talk:Pride flag

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ikanreed (talk | contribs) at 14:50, 7 June 2019 (→‎Rubber?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Untitled

From the LGBT article:

Controversy.

"LGBT is not uncontroversial. For example, some transgender and transsexual people do not like the term because they do not believe their cause is the same as that of LGB people; they may also object when an organization adds a T to their acronym when the level of service they actually offer to trans people is questionable. There are also LGB people who don't like the T for the same or similar reasons.

Many people also believe that a sharp distinction should be drawn between sexual orientation and gender identity. GLB concerns the former; TTI concerns the latter.

Similarly, some intersex people want to be included into LGBT groups and would prefer LGBTI; others insist that they are not a part of the LGBT community and would rather not be included in the acronym".

Dlloyd 22:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS.

As for "pride flag" as a term, there are several different pride flags which represent "sexuality and gender identity-based cultures". I think that it is somewhat misled to suggest that the term "pride flag" refers specifically "to one of the flags of the LGBT movement". The "rainbow flag" does not have exclusive rights to the term.

Dlloyd 07:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Restored gallery

I have restored the gallery found in Pride flag#Pride flag gallery. these seem important, and I don't see any reason to remove them from the display on the page. I am assuming they were removed from the display by mistake. Frietjes (talk) 12:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article had an existing gallery. You replaced it with a formatting that increased the size of the flags. I reverted your edit. Now you've again deleted the original gallery with your version. Your new edit, now with size control, displays the flags no different than how they displayed before. This was a needless edit. Furthermore, the summary explanation for your first edit was: "replace per discussion at template talk:flag entry". What discussion? You do not single out whatever discussion you think supported your edit, and the discussions that appear in that talk page do not relate to the gallery that existed in this article. You can't concoct a summary and think that other editors are not going to actually look into it. Pyxis Solitary yak 20:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Vlajka heterosexuálů.png shouldn't be on this page, but not really for the reasons mentioned by the anonymous IP. The main reason is that it's a flag for straight people devised by gay people... AnonMoos (talk) 05:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rubber?

Is rubber fetishism a pride flag with the same notability and relevance as the others? I'm not an expert, but it feels out of place. i kan reed (talk) 14:50, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]