Talk:Ranavalona I

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.2.154.213 (talk) at 05:38, 19 March 2009 (→‎Fictional description?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAfrica: Madagascar Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Madagascar.

Fictional description?

I'm unsure that a fictional description belongs in the main body of the article. Rhinoracer 10:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Placed in /Fiction section. Ekem 02:31, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In this article, it states that Ida Pfeiffer died, "presumably of malaria"

However, the article on Pfeiffer herself says that she died, "probably of cancer"

Quite possibly she was as bad as some accounts have made her out to be, but I feel a little cautious about depending heavily on an account with a title like "female Caligula" and the "mad Queen of Madagascar". PatGallacher (talk) 19:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can always read the sources; the novel 'Flashman's Lady', mentioned at the end of the article has a long list of contemporary accounts of her reign. Incidentaly, the author does not think she was mad.

About the picture of the queen in the article, Fraser's description makes her sounds darker. Since he did such a lot of reading in primary sources, is it possible the picture is not an accurate likeness, but done second-hand from descriptions, and lightened up a bit by the artist? She is unlikely to have sat for it, personaly, what with all the xenophobic masacres and so on. 76.2.154.213 (talk) 05:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]