Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ReaperRoe (talk | contribs) at 18:04, 17 February 2021 (→‎Audience reception). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 02:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

  • Remove Frank Oz from the infobox since he's not in the billing block.
 Done Chompy Ace 22:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • [[Lucasfilm Ltd.]] → [[Lucasfilm|Lucasfilm Ltd.]]
 Not done per WP:NOTBROKEN and consistent with Episodes VII and IX. Chompy Ace 22:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • A reference is needed for the film being dedicated to Carrie Fisher as it doesn't appear in any other section.
 Done Chompy Ace 22:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 21:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

  • Remove the comma after "dragged into space".
 Done Chompy Ace 22:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the comma after "the Jedi library".
 Done Chompy Ace 21:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

 Done Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The first reference after "slot machine" is dead.
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reference after "Force spirit" is dead.
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is the reference after "Commander D'Acy" necessary since it's already cited at the end of the sentence?
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
minus Replaced with the BFI. Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The last paragraph in this section has some really short sentences. Try combining some.
 Done Chompy Ace 21:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production

Development

 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is the quote from Kathleen Kennedy needed? Can it be changed to "In December, Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy said that the film had not been mapped out and..."?
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • In that same sentence, the use of the phrase "with Johnson and that Johnson" seems repetitive. Try rewording or splitting the sentences.
 Done reworded Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The sentence starting with "Abrams is an executive producer" seems out of place. Maybe change it to "Additionally, Abrams served as an executive producer".
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Combine the last two paragraphs in this section together and move January 23, 2017, to the beginning of the sentence it's in.
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The last sentence doesn't work without context. Add context and change "Carrie" to Carrie Fisher.
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "[[Kathleen Kennedy]]" → "[[Kathleen Kennedy (producer)|Kathleen Kennedy]]"
 Done Chompy Ace 01:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 01:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "revealed this as" → "revealed that"
 Done Chompy Ace 01:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Writing

 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Combine the last two paragraphs.
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Casting

  • The first reference after "playing a villain" is dead.
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Tran plays" → "Tran would play"
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Filming

 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reference after "filming in Mexico" only mentions Mexico once, and links to this source from Excélsior, so I would cite that instead.
 Done removed per Special:MobileDiff/1007271016 Chompy Ace 23:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Starting that same sentence with "In November 2014, Ivan Dunleavy, chief executive of Pinewood Studios, confirmed" seems misleading as the last part was from December 2015 and was said by Kathleen Kennedy. I suggest rewording, splitting, or just moving the last part farther down in #Filming.
 Done reworded Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't spot a change so this still feels misleading. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 00:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done removed per Special:MobileDiff/1007271016 Chompy Ace 02:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reference after "March 2016" is dead.
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is "In September 2015, del Toro revealed that principal photography would begin in March 2016;[44] Kennedy later said filming would begin in January 2016.[7]" necessary? Both sentences contradict themselves, making it harder for readers, and the point is already made in the next paragraph.
 Done removed "Kennedy later said filming would begin in January 2016.[7]" sentence Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • In this source, there's no mention of filming in Bolivia taking place in July.
 Fixed removed date Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "[[Star Wars#Prequel trilogy|prequel trilogy]]" → "[[Star Wars prequel trilogy|prequel trilogy]]"
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bringing the Spanish source back change "at the Salar de Uyuni salt flats in Bolivia.[60]" to "at the Salar de Uyuni salt flats in Bolivia.[60] Additional filming took place in Mexico.[61]"

Music

  • "Star Wars Celebration Europe" → "Star Wars Celebration Europe"
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The second reference in the first sentence is from June, so change "Kennedy announced" to "Kennedy confirmed".
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The first reference after "the sessions" is dead.
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release

minus Replaced with Los Angeles Daily News Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing

  • Remove "were released on October 12" as it's already mentioned.
 Done Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This section is really short so I would combine all three paragraphs.
 Done Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Last Jedi: Visual Dictionary" → "The Last Jedi: The Visual Dictionary" (the actual title)
 Done Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Home media

  • This subsection looks good.
 Already done Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Box office

  • "$712.6 million" → "$712.5 million"
 Done Chompy Ace 23:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fix the link in "seventh-biggest of all time".
 Fixed Chompy Ace 23:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think it's now the eighth biggest, not the seventh.
 Done Chompy Ace 23:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
United States and Canada
 Done Chompy Ace 23:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 23:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • A reference is needed for the film opening at "4,232 theaters".
 Done Chompy Ace 23:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "a total of 67.5%" → "a total of 67%"
 Done Chompy Ace 23:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "$71.6 million" → "$71.7 million"
 Done Chompy Ace 23:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "$23.7 million" → "$23.6 million"
 Done Chompy Ace 23:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Other countries
  • "set in France" → "set in various countries, including France"
 Done Chompy Ace 02:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • What does "compared the opening of The Force Awakens" even mean? Is the sentence finished?
 Done removed Chompy Ace 02:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "which compared the opening" → "compared to the opening"
 Done removed Chompy Ace 02:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 02:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed added pre-existing reference Chompy Ace 02:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reference after "showtimes by 90%" has the wrong title.

Critical response

  • Update Rotten Tomatoes.
 Done Chompy Ace 01:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 01:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Audience reception

  • "2.67 stars" → "2.6 stars"
 Done Chompy Ace 01:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "4.3 out of 10" → "4.2 out of 10"
 Done Chompy Ace 01:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some Multiple claims in the last paragraph have THREE citations each. Try removing some per WP:OVERLINK.
 Done have reduced to one or two citations, and one from the first sentence in this section is converted into a bundle Chompy Ace 08:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See here and here. I restored the refs, but I bundled them. See WP:CITEBUNDLE and WP:Citation overkill. I think the reviewer meant WP:Citation overkill, not WP:OVERLINK. WP:OVERLINK isn't about refs. The refs aren't redundant. They are there so that that the sentences are fully verified. If we say "several reviewers" and only have one reviewer supporting the sentence, that leaves the sentence somewhat unverified. There's also a WP:Hidden note in the section showing that the section was crafted after a lot of discussion. ReaperRoe (talk) 18:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accolades

 Done Chompy Ace 02:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
minus Replaced with Los Angeles Times Chompy Ace 01:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
minus Replaced with Entertainment Weekly Chompy Ace 06:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the MTV Award, can "Best Actor in a Movie" be changed to "Best Performance in a Movie" per the source used?
 Done Chompy Ace 06:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel

  • This section looks good.
 Already done Chompy Ace 06:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • Mark citations from Vanity Fair with "url-access=limited".
 Done Chompy Ace 21:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per consistency with the rest of the article, Yahoo! and Bleeding Cool should not be in italics.
 Done Chompy Ace 06:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done ref was removed (See #Audience reception) Chompy Ace 08:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 08:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 08:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 10:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done reference had been removed (See #Critical response) Chompy Ace 10:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 10:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done as The Observer was removed due to its tabloid format Chompy Ace 01:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 10:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done ref was removed (See #Audience reception) Chompy Ace 10:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The New Yorker should be marked as "url-access=limited", not "url-access=subscription".
 Fixed Chompy Ace 01:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Alirjaafar" → "Jaafar; Ali"
 Done removed per Special:MobileDiff/1007271016 Chompy Ace 06:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The last reference, located after "with Chris Terrio" in #Sequel, is not working.
 Fixed Chompy Ace 06:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progess

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·