Talk:The Remarkables: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
→‎top: Removed WikiProject needs-infobox parameter(s) for article with infobox & general fixes per WP:Talk page layout
Line 16: Line 16:


Have I misunderstood something? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/188.143.39.186|188.143.39.186]] ([[User talk:188.143.39.186#top|talk]]) 17:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Have I misunderstood something? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/188.143.39.186|188.143.39.186]] ([[User talk:188.143.39.186#top|talk]]) 17:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Lord of the Rings movie locations ==

The article does not mention that the mountains were used as filming location for multiple scenes in the Lord of the Rings movies. This seems like it warrants inclusion, based on the continued prominence of the association in regional tourism, mention in multiple guide books, and other indicators of notability. These may be enough to warrant a distinct section, rather than an "in popular culture" notation -- particularly if there are not enough other usages in popular culture to populate that type of section.

[[User:Eyoungstrom|Prof. Eric A. Youngstrom]] ([[User talk:Eyoungstrom|talk]]) 10:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:00, 5 January 2024

WikiProject iconNew Zealand Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMountains Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Similar to Treble Cone article

I wrote The Remarkables article very similar to the Treble Cone article, and will do so for the Coronet Peak article too, because I thought the layout of the Treble Cone article was very well done. I felt I needed to explain that. samh004 09:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Rectified

Undid edits. Describing the facilities and terrain is hardly "advertising". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.254.22 (talk) 10:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for name

There are two possible reasons for the name given on this page -- one that this is one of two mountain ranges that runs north-south and the other to do with sunsets seen by early Queenstown settlers.

Neither of these sounds plausible to me. Many mountain ranges run north-south (Andes, Rockies, Appalachian, Sierra Nevada etc etc) and because the Remarkables are east of Queenstown, settlers there would have seen the sun rising over the mountains, not setting.

Have I misunderstood something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.143.39.186 (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lord of the Rings movie locations

The article does not mention that the mountains were used as filming location for multiple scenes in the Lord of the Rings movies. This seems like it warrants inclusion, based on the continued prominence of the association in regional tourism, mention in multiple guide books, and other indicators of notability. These may be enough to warrant a distinct section, rather than an "in popular culture" notation -- particularly if there are not enough other usages in popular culture to populate that type of section.

Prof. Eric A. Youngstrom (talk) 10:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]