User talk:Arter786

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Arter786, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! LouisOrr27 (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Arter786. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 11:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Equine-man I have not Accused in any Paid Contributions or Conflict of Interest in any Article. Arter786 (talk) 11:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So how did the paid banner appear on your draft Draft:Khaie? These don’t magically appear. Equine-man (talk) 12:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Equine-man User:CNMall41 add this template. And this is not Paid Contributions articles or there is any Conflict of Interest in this Article. Arter786 (talk) 12:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see a check user request is pending. Now I know. Equine-man (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Equine-man For What? Do you think I'm a Sock. ? Arter786 (talk) 12:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, we know you're a Nauman335 sock. You'll be blocked soon, edits reverted and articles deleted. You know the drill, WP:BANREVERT which you've seen done more than a few times before. WP:BLOCKEVASION isn't tolerated here. Ravensfire (talk) 22:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire It's not Fair. I Just created the page Draft:Khaie because it was not present in Wikipedia. I'm not a Sock user. Recently User:Arjayay edited the same page so he is a sock ? Please stop Taging me as a Sock. It is not clear who edited the same page will be a sock user. Arter786 (talk) 04:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you hear the term "sock?" Strange for someone with so few edits. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 When my account was created a Message Left on my Talk page. Here i read the All Condition for editing on Wikipedia . Arter786 (talk) 04:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arter786 has now been blocked as a sock and edits reverted per WP:BANREVERT. Ravensfire (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits[edit]

Hey, Arter786 your recent edit on page Ishq Murshid has been confirmed as reverted and you are identified as a Sockpuppet of Nauman335 I restored the older revision of the page, please stop to reverting to this page ꜱᴜʀꜰᴜɴᴄʜʏ (talk) 11:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Your recent editing history at Ishq Murshid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Equine-man (talk) 11:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pagal Khana (April 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: DUCK of (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nauman335#18_April_2024).

CNMall41 (talk) 19:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arter786! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 19:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]