User talk:Music1201: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:47, 17 July 2016

This is Music1201's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23: 5 days

This is Music1201's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23: 5 days

Rivers of Europe

Was realigning sections: "in Greece" was a separate section when it should have been a subsection of "Ionian Sea" Akwdb (talk) 20:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Akwdb: Oh sorry about that. — Music1201 ^talk 20:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I should have left an edit summary. Akwdb (talk) 20:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Tony Scherman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tony Scherman. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Melnick

Hi! Could I ask you to undo your premature close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Melnick? WP:AfD reads, right in the first paragraph, "Articles listed are normally discussed for at least seven days, after which the deletion process proceeds based on community consensus". Since there's only one opinion there apart from that of the article creator (who predictably voted keep), a lot more input is going to be needed before consensus can be judged; and it hasn't been open seven days yet, either. The article still has, as far as I can see, no independent reliable in-depth coverage of the subject at all; what sources did you see that persuaded you that my nomination was not well founded? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: Sorry about that, I misread the dates, I'll reopen. — Music1201 ^talk 20:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Give the 'tb-override' right to page movers

Would you be so kind as edit the RfC to list all previous RfCs and possibly other discussions? Thanks! --19:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Sure. — Music1201 ^talk 19:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please adopt me

Please accept me as your student in Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy. Please reply soon Thanks. Nepali keto62_{Questions?!?!?} 09:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nepali keto62: Unfortunately I'm busy with a few other things so I cannot accept at this time. — Music1201 ^talk 21:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia (9th nomination)

I don't think a NAC is appropriate here. I stated clearly why I thought AfDs 3-8 didn't apply (did you read through them?), and Wikipedia's standards on notability have evolved significantly since 2007. Also, a discussion that was open for seven days can hardly be "speedy kept." Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 21:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mackensen: My close was definitely valid. When notability guidelines change, articles that don't meet the new guidelines don't get deleted (otherwise we'd only have half the articles we do now). If notability was an issue, it would have been deleted years ago. I notice that some AfDs for the article also mention possible COI issues, please bring up those issues at the Conflict of interest Noticeboard. — Music1201 ^talk 21:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 Please accept me as your student in [[Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy]]. Please reply soon Thanks. [[User:Nepali keto62|'''<span style="cursor:crosshair;color:white;background:green">Nepali keto62</span>''']]<sub> [[User talk:Nepali keto62#top|'''<span style="cursor:crosshair;color:green;background:lightblue">Questions?!?!?</span>''']] </sub>  09:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 :{{ping|Nepali keto62}} Unfortunately I'm busy with a few other things so I cannot accept at this time. <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 21:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
+== Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia (9th nomination) ==
+I don't think a NAC is appropriate here. I stated clearly why I thought AfDs 3-8 didn't apply (did you read through them?), and Wikipedia's standards on notability have evolved significantly since 2007. Also, a discussion that was open for seven days can hardly be "speedy kept." Thanks, [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 21:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
+:{{ping|Mackensen}} My close was definitely valid. When notability guidelines change, articles that don't meet the new guidelines don't get deleted (otherwise we'd only have half the articles we do now). If notability was an issue, it would have been deleted years ago. I notice that some AfDs for the article also mention possible COI issues, please bring up those issues at the [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard|Conflict of interest Noticeboard]]. <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Music1201|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 21:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)