User talk:WolfStonerRocker

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 02:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:RegentsPark. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

Hello, and Good Day. Let me explain the notice, it appears a bit rough to some people. Phrases that target an editor instead of content are considered personal attacks and will lead to a ban/block depending on the amount of leniency shown. Please refrain from using phrases such as "You have no credibility on this matter", "you use it to further your agenda", "You do not edit in good faith, you do so to push Nationalistic POV that you support", "The views that differ from yours are done so correctly, and you continuously try to redirect this away from you and other Pakistani editors, in a most obvious way. This is called a Block in political terms.", "The way you have joined this conversation also speaks volumes as to the manner in which you think is an acceptable way to force your views as the correct and only one.", "your are trying to control the narrative and protect you fellow Pakistani editors actions, very disingenuously and with contempt of WPs overall goals to build an encyclopaedia.", "so this is also a lie". IF you think that an editor is behaving inappropriately you should take your evidence to the administrators noticeboard WP:ANI instead of commenting about an editor on Talk Pages. IF you do not have evidence then please do not comment on an editor like this again. Ty FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 04:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

• I have done no such thing. Remove this notice or I will consider it harassment form you. You have been mentioned on the AN/I by me and as such we will not be engaging in discourse. You have 30 minutes to remove this or I will remove it. Do not contact me again for any reason, as you were expressly told on the Yadav talk page.

Nürö ^{G'DÄŸ MÄTË} 04:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

I am telling you this very candidly that if you take this to ANI. It will most definitely boomerang against you. Your statement was most definitely a personal attack which I have ignored but FreeatlastChitchat have noticed. He did the right thing to give you this notice, you should avoid personal attacks such as these. You should appreciate him that he is teaching you civility instead of getting upset on him. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Nuro, you should comment at WP:AE instead of WP:ANI. See [1]. --ArghyaIndian (talk) 05:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)