User talk:Passionless

Archives February 2010 — February 2011

New SPAs?

Any idea who these two users might be?

• Negat nazri kasturi
• Sirwal

Nightw 08:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I think they are both related to the person attacking me as of late, I emailed oversight before I went to bed but looks like they did not ban the two yet. Passionless -Talk 19:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

{{adminhelp}} I was wondering if Sirwal could be banned outright as being obviously related to Negat nazri kasturi and the numerous other accounts of a banned user who have attacked this talk page this week, or do I still have to go through SPI/AE. Also Negat did leave some insulting edit summaries, I emailed oversight over 12 hours ago, but no response, so hopefully you can take care of that too? Thanks, Passionless -Talk 20:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you want an oversighter to do—all they can do is permanently remove edits from visibility. It sounds like you want a checkuser, but if the socking is blatant or the account is being purely disruptive, you can report to WP:AIV. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

An oversighter could remove the insulting edit summaries...I highly doubt they will be interested at AIV as he is only disruptive puppet of a banned user, not a vandal. Passionless -Talk 20:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

You don't need oversight to remove edit summaries, I can do that if you give me the diffs here or by email (assuming they meet the criteria). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Never mind. I've deleted the offending revision and edit summaries. I'm not really able to look into the socking issue right now. I'd suggest taking it to ANI, AIV or an individual admin you trust who's familiar with the background. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm seeing multiple accounts that are obviously the same user: Msmsmstruth, Ouou9529, Anakites, Arakiel, Suresh4569, Wizgame54312, Negat nazri kasturi. Whether Sirwal fits in, I don't know. Is it worth reopening that sockcase? Nightw 09:36, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

ITN: 2011 Wisconsin budget protests

-- tariqabjotu 14:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Signing

Do you mind to sign your last comment on GH? This would make the discussion more readable and easier to follow. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

w/e, I forget every 1 in a thousand posts. Passionless -Talk 09:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Happens to everyone. 10x. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 10:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to restore the topography image, I'd appreciate your patience, while the discussion is ongoing. I've contacted the image contributer and their input would be very welcome on article talk page. See their map gallery for more samples. There are strong feelings on all sides and their perspective would be helpful. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 10:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

FYI, There is a neutrality of the map review. Your input is welcome there. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team wants You!

Hi Passionless, It looks like you have interest in helping newcomers to Wikipedia, and I saw that some of your contributions fall within the scope of Wikiproject: United States Public Policy, so I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the Public Policy Initiative. There is more info about assessment on the 9/13/2010 Signpost. This Initiative has a big focus on helping new people, so I think you should check it out. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the project page or just contact me. Thanks! ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 00:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

About labelling people

A wildcat in the wildlife park

About your argument that authors should be labeled as "Arab" or "Jew" to warn of bias, I think other editors have the right to know your bias. My personal page is rather explicit on this but yours is not. Passionless, what is your race and religion? Emmanuelm (talk) 18:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

One, my arguement made it clear that I thought labels were appropriate only when relevant to the opinions being given by the people/organizations, and two I do not lead a public life, you have no right to ask anything about me. Passionless -Talk 20:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm watching this page, after discussing other issues with Passionless above. Emmanuel, I'm warning you, since you are out of line completely and you should apologize. You are free to disclose any privacy information about you. Wikipedia is totally anonymous, see WP:OUTING for instance. Right of editors for privacy is guarded carefully by the community. You should also review WP:HA and try to be civil to other editors. Otherwise you will be banned by the community. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 21:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that AgadaUrbanit, and thanks for the pet jaguar too, Passionless -Talk 21:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Hope you don't mind the felis's cousin  ;) If you're not comfortable, I will remove the decorating addition and your talk page from my watchlist. Stay well. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 21:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Passionless, that was a baited hook to help you realize how ugly racism is. You did not bite, good for you. Now, show the same respect to others that you demand for yourself. As for Agada, if you feel like commenting further, go there. Emmanuelm (talk) 03:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Phhhh...No. This account is not a public person, but public people are, so they do not have the option of controlling what people say about them, short of libel/defemation that is. But don't worry once I become leader of the universe, you can talk about my ethnicity and religion. Passionless -Talk 04:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop

Adding such POV as you added here. Besides being POV, it is false. No Afghans were killed in Iraq. If you continue editing like this, I believe topic ban would be justified.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

He, oops, I did mean to write Iraqis of course, don't know why I wrote Afghanis, anyways you can take your POV claims and kick em to the curb along with your original POV pushing which I notice you did not restore all of, good. Passionless -Talk

Aren't you under 1RR per week?--Mbz1 (talk) 20:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

That is for I-P conflicts only, Passionless -Talk 20:35, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi I've been attacked by an admin again...what do you claim I did wrong now? Passionless -Talk 20:38, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

(edit conflict) It seems you're just not getting the message, so I've blocked you for 48 hours. You can, of course, appeal using {{unblock|reason}}. Hopefully you'll use this time to take a read of policies, in particular, I'd recommend WP:SYNTH, WP:NPOV, WP:COATRACK and WP:EW. Remember the old adage that goes something like "if I can tell from your writing where your sympathies lie, you're not writing neutrally". Please try to keep your nose clean when you return. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:38, 7 March 2011 (UTC)