User talk:WayKurat: Difference between revisions
→September 2023: Reply Tag: Reverted |
moving on. Hope you are happy now Hotwiki |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Thank you and God bless! |
Thank you and God bless! |
||
== September 2023 == |
|||
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Saksi]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 06:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
|||
{{ping|Aoidh}} Just to comment, you should check the reporter's reverting issue. As mentioned in the ANI, Hotwiki is also guilty of reverting edits as well. He's the one that triggered the edit war by removing the content he claimed is unsourced. The third revert I did happened while I was editing the article adding sources to those content he removed in the first place. I believe was blocked due to a technicality of the 3RR. -[[User:WayKurat|WayKurat]] ([[User talk:WayKurat#top|talk]]) 08:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Each of your reverts added exactly +3,026 characters to the article, adding the sources only ''after'' making that many reverts is still edit warring, even if you did subsequently add sources after making those reverts. Once it was known there was a disagreement and that the issue was sources it would be been better to discuss it on the talk page or wait until you have the sources before reinserting the content, rather than persistently restoring the unsourced content. As for Hotwiki, their edits are being monitored and continued reverting on their part will result in a block as well. - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 08:35, 8 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:41, 8 September 2023
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
- Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
- You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
 | This page is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Notification of disruptive editing
Hello WayKurat - I just want to bring to your attention about a potential editing issue. This particular user has restored what you have already removed/reverted previously, in the guise of adding more information, which are mostly irrelevant and unnecessary. See here. I have previously already contacted another editor regarding a similar issue (adding one-off/insignificant characters) and he has already posted a note on the user's talk page. I am just making you aware of the situation as I am trying my best to copy edit, but at the rate of having so much trivial information added to the article, it becomes problematic.
Adding Kapamilya Channel on the given series.
Hello WayKurat, um shouldn't you add the Kapamilya Channel in the network label of Love Thy Woman since it's included in the list of programs for the channel and ABS-CBN is still pending its renewal? Thanks.
Insisting on putting File:GMA Network 2011 Logo.png for GMA TV-7, GMA TV-6 and GMA TV-5 stations
Hello! I'm very sorry because I did not mean that i'm keeping on insisting on putting File:GMA Network 2011 Logo.png for GMA TV-7, GMA TV-6 and GMA TV-5 stations would be included. I've recently add a fair use rationale logo for each time I use that 2011 logo on every GMA Network TV stations to an articles since i've upload the image for the channel. So next time I am trying my best to edit or adding that 2011 on several GMA TV station articles with a valid fair use rationale for them, with the exception of GMA TV-7 in Metro Manila, Naga and Metro Cebu, GMA TV-6 in Iloilo and GMA TV-5 in Davao. Thanks!
Adding fair use rationale for File:GMA Network 2011 Logo.png on several GMA TV station articles
Hello, WayKurat! I've recently adding that 2011 logo on several GMA Network TV station articles with a valid fair use rationale for them. Please be noticed that you are keep on insisting on putting this logo for several GMA TV stations were altogether included, while the original logo is for GMA TV-7 stations in Metro Manila, Naga and Metro Cebu, GMA TV-6 station in Iloilo City and GMA TV-5 station in Davao City, but some of the stations in Romblon, Ilocos Norte, Abra, Mountain Province, Baler, Brooke's Point, Romblon, Masbate, Roxas, Dumaguete and Ozamiz are not belonging to GMA TV-7 stations, GMA TV-6 stations and GMA TV-5 stations because they are adding a fair-use rationale for each time I use that 2011 logo to an articles. Regards! Boombastic061
March 13, 2021
Hello, WayKurat! I would like to report that orphaned fair-use of 2011 logo on several GMA Network TV station articles for widespread edits by Hammersoft (rm logo per WP:NFC#UUI #17) to removed this image to an article. I reminded that adding that current logo with a valid fair use rationale for them since i've recently upload the file and ADD a fair use rationale for several TV stations. Please be noticed that you are reverting to the previous revision of that 2011 logo on every GMA TV station articles that i edit and please remember to an edit summary (the current logo is for several GMA TV stations) so that the files i have uploaded will remove that notice from deleted this image and no longer to reverting or widespread edits for them by misguided editors.
Thank you and God bless!