User talk:204.69.40.101: Difference between revisions
Mildly Mad (talk | contribs) Please stop or you will be reported for edit warring. |
Mildly Mad (talk | contribs) You added the GaWC information to Minneapolis again. Please discuss this, or I will report you for edit warring, |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Hi again. Please take some time to justify your addition to the [[Minneapolis]] article using the [[Talk:Minneapolis|talk page]]. You have repeatedly added this information to the article, despite requests from several users to stop and/or discuss the changes. If you continue to do so, you may be reported for [[WP:EDITWAR|edit warring]], which could lead to a block from editing. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thank You. [[User:Mildly Mad|Mildly Mad]]<sup>[[User talk:Mildly Mad|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:contributions/Mildly_Mad|C]]</sub> 17:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC) |
Hi again. Please take some time to justify your addition to the [[Minneapolis]] article using the [[Talk:Minneapolis|talk page]]. You have repeatedly added this information to the article, despite requests from several users to stop and/or discuss the changes. If you continue to do so, you may be reported for [[WP:EDITWAR|edit warring]], which could lead to a block from editing. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thank You. [[User:Mildly Mad|Mildly Mad]]<sup>[[User talk:Mildly Mad|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:contributions/Mildly_Mad|C]]</sub> 17:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
==November 2009== |
|||
Hi again. You have once again added the same un-sourced information to the [[Minneapolis]] article, which several editors (myself included) have repeatedly opposed. The Minneapolis article is one of Wikipedia's [[WP:FA|featured articles]], so we must carefully consider whether an edit is an improvement to the article, and current [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] is to exclude the information you have added from the article. Remember that [[WP:NOT#STATS|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]]. If you believe it has a place in the article, please discuss it at [[Talk:Minneapolis]] and we can work together to try to include it. If you repeat this edit again without discussing it on the talk page, I will report you for [[WP:EDITWAR|edit warring]], which could lead to a block from editing. Thanks. [[User:Mildly Mad|Mildly Mad]]<sup>[[User talk:Mildly Mad|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:contributions/Mildly_Mad|C]]</sub> 21:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:36, 10 November 2009
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
 Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Area code 646 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- lucasbfr talk 22:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dresden, Ohio has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Trusilver 07:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Karlstad, Minnesota constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Hiawatha Line. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. - XXX antiuser 17:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Downtown Minneapolis Ballpark (Metro Transit station), you will be blocked from editing. CliffC (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
October 2009
Hi there. Please stop adding the statement about GWAC rankings to the Minneapolis article. Consensus is that that information is not relevant. If you have a good reason for it to be added, please discuss it on the talk page first. Mildly MadTC 18:53, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi again. Please take some time to justify your addition to the Minneapolis article using the talk page. You have repeatedly added this information to the article, despite requests from several users to stop and/or discuss the changes. If you continue to do so, you may be reported for edit warring, which could lead to a block from editing. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thank You. Mildly MadTC 17:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
Hi again. You have once again added the same un-sourced information to the Minneapolis article, which several editors (myself included) have repeatedly opposed. The Minneapolis article is one of Wikipedia's featured articles, so we must carefully consider whether an edit is an improvement to the article, and current consensus is to exclude the information you have added from the article. Remember that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If you believe it has a place in the article, please discuss it at Talk:Minneapolis and we can work together to try to include it. If you repeat this edit again without discussing it on the talk page, I will report you for edit warring, which could lead to a block from editing. Thanks. Mildly MadTC 21:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC)