User talk:75.154.186.241: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:13, 13 June 2009

Attention:

This IP address, 75.154.186.241, is registered to Telus. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Ramu50 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

"Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ramu50" does not exist.
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)

Wikipedia talk pages are not a forum. They are used to discuss issues with the article itself. Montgomery' 39 (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to the NEDM or the Twilight article? --75.154.186.241 (talk) 02:26, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Twilight (2008 film) for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Pmlinediter (talk) 14:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I will try to change into a question format. It was initially meant to be a genre categorization question, but I got off topic and the discussion because more of a "wonder / daydream" as oppose to a formal question. --75.154.186.241 (talk) 03:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Guild Wars (series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 13:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gunz

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page GunZ: The Duel has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwikia\.com\b (links: http://gunz.wikia.com/wiki/main_page).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I might consider reverting, since it is not constructive and I don't think WP:EL doesn't have a policy for note form linking to talk page. --75.154.186.241 (talk) 18:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Deleted content request

See Category talk:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles#Request 2 –xeno ^talk 19:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The editing style reminds me of someone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ANvidia&diff=287795993&oldid=287679279

Who could that be? Hmm, ah, yes. User:Ramu50. Still the same mind-map styled unconstructive edits. --203.218.195.66 (talk) 06:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Weigh

Template box

Hello there, I read your note about liststyle and groupstyle and looked at the talk page. There are a couple of things that have been done with other templates. One is to nest templates within templates such as is done at Portal:Roads and its template Template:Highways topics, then the content is there without the length. Therefore a template named Computer Components could be made and another named Accessories to both nest within Template:Linux devices.
The other thing that helps is to do make a template like the Template:Alberta rivers and lakes where the high priority or articles searched for the most and viewed the most are added to the template, and the rest are in the template as more which is a Link or direct to an article with a complete list of Rivers etc. which may also work with various aspects of the template Template:Linux devices, as some technology will be current, some will be dinosaurs, and some will be new on the market, which will help to know what to rotate in and out of the template, whilst keeping an article named "List of Linux somethings" comprehensive and well cited. Do you think making this kind of changes would help. I could help if this may be what you are aiming for.SriMesh | talk 17:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked by User:Tiptoety for 2 Weeks for being a sockpuppet of indef blocked User:Ramu50. As such, you are not to "play" with templates on your talk page. If you do, your access to this talk page will be blocked. If you wish to appeal your block, type {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 19:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here for evidence of your sockpuppetry. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 19:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Akashic Record

I don't understand this distinction that you are attempting to make between 'spiritual science' and religion/occult, and why you think the akashic record is part of one and not the other. The article mentions it being a theosophical concept in the intro, and several prominent theosophists are mentioned as being advocates of this idea, so it seems fairly reasonable to me that it should be included in Category:Theosophy. --Clay Collier (talk) 21:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Akashic Experience:Science and the Cosmic Memory Field" a collaborative book written by many system scientists theorist (Ervin László included). --75.154.186.241 (talk) 21:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy topics

The color on the template were changed to match a consistent scheme among WP:PHILO. Please do not change it again without some proposal at WT:PHILO under the discussion about the color scheme.Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 04:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

Ramu50, please note that evading a user block is against the rules of WP (see WP:BLOCK). If you wish to appeal against the blocking of your account, please follow the instructions in WP:APPEAL - editing an closed investigation page is unlikely to help. Letdorf (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 == Block evasion ==
 Ramu50, please note that evading a user block is against the rules of WP (see [[WP:BLOCK]]). If you wish to appeal against the blocking of your account, please follow the instructions in [[WP:APPEAL]] - editing an [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramu50/Archive|closed investigation page]] is unlikely to help. [[User:Letdorf|Letdorf]] ([[User talk:Letdorf|talk]]) 13:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC).
-== June 2009 ==
-[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Behavior that is unacceptable|delete or edit]] legitimate talk page comments{{#if:|, as you did at [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-tpv3 --> [[User:Rackham|Rackham]] ([[User talk:Rackham|talk]]) 20:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
-:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
-That rules apply to only Wikipedia articles, template, portals...etc, not User talk page. As a matter of fact, this incident has already been notified me before several times, when I was using my old account ramu50 and I have full rights to delete anything on this user talk page, since this isn't a share ip. I use this IP, because I have changed my ISP due to financial issue as a student, rather than 70.79.65.227 as stated [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ramu50]]. Please do not attempt to cruft and synthesize your own rules on Wikipedia. I probably will use this for 1 year+.
-Also since you mention deletion of talk pages, you should also note that behaviors like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A75.154.186.241&diff=289724223&oldid=289723854 Neutralhomer vandalism] is unacceptable in Wikipedia. I have already stated part on [[Template talk:Computer Science]] that part of my edits were to resolve some crufting, since the templates were already very messy before my edits.
-Also many of the contents are crufting and repeated too many contents from other computer related templates and I don't know why the users choose not to participate the talk page for such a long period of time.
---[[Special:Contributions/75.154.186.241|75.154.186.241]] ([[User talk:75.154.186.241#top|talk]]) 00:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
-==Sockpuppet Template==
-If you remove the sockpuppet template from this page again, I will recommend this talk page be blocked for vandalism and you be blocked as a sock.  Please stop now. - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • 01:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
-:First Wikipedia never have this rule about Socketpuppeter are restricted to edit their own talk page. Also the state is already confirmed in the User page and I never pose my position as not admitting my Sockpuppetry. As this have been evidential [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ramu50/Archive&oldid=293551792 proven] in the investigation archived, though improper. You could of "updated" by replacing it with <nowiki>{{IPsockProven|Ramu50}}</nowiki> or confirmed by changing the category. Yet you refuse to do so and not follow the terms of Wikipedia. So stop disturbing and do the "proper procedure." Stop acting like a 2 year old. It is already quite over that you are biased and prejudice against prior to my previous edit on [[Template:Verstandig Broadcasting]] in regard to the dots format. --[[Special:Contributions/75.154.186.241|75.154.186.241]] ([[User talk:75.154.186.241#top|talk]]) 01:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
-::You are blocked as Ramu50, that means you can't edit anywhere on Wikipedia as any user or an anon user....period.  No ifs, ands or buts about it.  If you wish to edit Wikipedia, I recommend you request an unblock on [[User:Ramu50|your account]] or you will be blocked here.  Also, I have started an ANI post about your block evasion actions. - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • 01:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
-:First I already expressed blocking this IP and 70.... IP so please stop your edits imposing as an administrator when you are not. Also I am already trying to write a more responsible blocking request then the one submitted in the archives.
-:Note: The unblocking message made on the archives, since it is improper I am considering that as a draft. Rather than being irresponsible like you again. --[[Special:Contributions/75.154.186.241|75.154.186.241]] ([[User talk:75.154.186.241#top|talk]]) 02:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
-::What?!  OK, you don't get to make an unblock request here.  Sorry.  You are a confirmed sockpuppet and have ben blocked as one on two different IPs (this one included).  If you want to be unblocked, request it at [[User talk:Ramu50]], otherwise I will request that this page be blocked so you can't edit period. - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • 02:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)</small>