User talk:85.141.14.195

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing.--88.211.44.71 (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Three-revert warning

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Tamara Toumanova. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--McGeddon (talk) 12:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

As the warning says, "Do not edit war even if you believe you are right." - both you and the other IP address have been warned for edit warring.

If an article dispute has reached the point where two editors have two differently sourced claims and can't agree on which to use in the article, I'd suggest raising an WP:RFC on the talk page to get some feedback from unconnected editors. --McGeddon (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

ok, thank you! I'll ask for RFC. 85.141.14.195 (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Drmies (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• That you were edit-warring is clear; that you never even gave an edit summary or participated in talk page discussion is clear also. Above, you say something about an RfC, but you did so after you reverted again. Such editing, without explanation and against consensus, is not acceptable. If you return from your block and continue in the same vein, you will probably be blocked again, and the article might be protected against IP edits. Choose a better way. Drmies (talk) 14:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Dear user, please refrain from removing sources and references, and manipulating the text. Please refer to the Discussion page on the topic of Tamara's personal life section. The current version has everyones contributions and sources mentioned, so its balanced. If you have any new materials and information please feel free to add to the discussion page. Thank you --91.125.126.1 (talk) 23:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Tamara Toumanova#RfC note and consider stopping your edit war. Antique Rose — Drop me a line 10:07, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Warning

Your recent editing history at Tamara Toumanova shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Antique Rose — Drop me a line 10:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tamara Toumanova shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Antique Rose — Drop me a line 13:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Tamara Toumanova, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Antique Rose — Drop me a line 14:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:09, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.