User talk:96.57.1.171

July 2017

Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cameroon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please, I don't watch pages) 19:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aiptasia pallida. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Aiptasia pallida was changed by 96.57.1.171 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986026 on 2017-07-14T15:04:59+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

96.57.1.171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is a public computer and I don't know what cretin vandal did this editing but we need access for our institution. 96.57.1.171 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is a public computer and I don't know what cretin vandal did this editing but we need access for our institution. [[Special:Contributions/96.57.1.171|96.57.1.171]] ([[User talk:96.57.1.171#top|talk]]) 15:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is a public computer and I don't know what cretin vandal did this editing but we need access for our institution. [[Special:Contributions/96.57.1.171|96.57.1.171]] ([[User talk:96.57.1.171#top|talk]]) 15:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is a public computer and I don't know what cretin vandal did this editing but we need access for our institution. [[Special:Contributions/96.57.1.171|96.57.1.171]] ([[User talk:96.57.1.171#top|talk]]) 15:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}