User talk:Al-Andalusi: Difference between revisions
GoldenRing (talk | contribs) Remove extra heading |
Al-Andalusi (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> [[User:GoldenRing|GoldenRing]] ([[User talk:GoldenRing|talk]]) 09:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC) |
You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> [[User:GoldenRing|GoldenRing]] ([[User talk:GoldenRing|talk]]) 09:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
}} |
}} |
||
:I'm ''not'' appealing the ban. I have no trust in a process that involves an admin who can be easily gamed by other editors to hand out bans at will. In the linked arbitration request, the section titled "Statement by Al-Andalusi" is empty. What is the point of all those talk page notification formalities if the arbitrators are not willing to follow through with the process guidelines? [[User:Al-Andalusi|Al-Andalusi]] ([[User talk:Al-Andalusi#top|talk]]) 18:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:24, 8 June 2017
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
WP:ARBPIA
Please review the restrictions on pages related to the Israel-Palestinian conflict at Template:ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement. One of the restrictions says "Editors are required to obtain consensus through discussion before restoring a reverted edit." Debresser (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
A proposal for collaboration
Hello,
I saw some of your contributions, some of your talk page archives, and some other discussions you made in articles talk pages, and I saw your willingness to improve many articles. However I believe that I can help you do that by using a platform that better tracks progress (but not only that). We can thus start compiling documents which are needed for an article (like a small bibliography), find other relevant articles that are related and for which we can make additions, set some goals and parts that need change, read those sources while taking notes (that platform provides a great way to keep progress and to set milestones, so that we can make for example 100 pages of this book and this paper due for this milestone 19 May 2017), and then start merging changes and fine-tuning things... There's more to it so I was just mentioning only the very basic stuff!
Here's a link, https://github.com/seblafrite/wp/issues (make an account there and add a comment so that I can add you there)
For what it's worth, I'm fluent in both English and Arabic.
Looking forward to cooperating with you!
Yours faithfully, --177.87.112.218 (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Category:Treaties of Muhammad has been nominated for discussion
Category:Treaties of Muhammad, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Edit warring noticeboard report
- You can respond to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Al-Andalusi reported by User:OccultZone .28Result: .29 OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Lies and distortions. I'm glad no one gave a shit to your claims. Al-Andalusi (talk) 17:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
There's a complaint filed against you, see:Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Al-Andalusi. Capitals00 (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are banned from all edits and pages related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed, for a period of six months.
You have been sanctioned for personal attacks ([1] [2]), incivility ([3]), violating 1RR ([4] [5] [6]) and general TE at Talk:Acid throwing.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. GoldenRing (talk) 09:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not appealing the ban. I have no trust in a process that involves an admin who can be easily gamed by other editors to hand out bans at will. In the linked arbitration request, the section titled "Statement by Al-Andalusi" is empty. What is the point of all those talk page notification formalities if the arbitrators are not willing to follow through with the process guidelines? Al-Andalusi (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)