User talk:Angelo De La Paz: Difference between revisions
→Miss World 2006: new section |
|||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
== Please participate== |
== Please participate== |
||
Hi Angelo! There is a heavy discussion right now, in this article, [[Miss Pakistan World]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Pakistan_World here] and it was nominated for deletion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Miss_Pakistan_World here]; your opinion will be highly appreciated, especially your vote. Your participation in this matter is noteworthy, in view of the fact that you are a member of the Wiki Project Beauty Pageants. It doesn’t matter if your vote is favorable or not, but what matters most is your involvement since it seems to me that some commenter are against pageantry. Personally, I think that the article should be kept but should be freed from tremendous advertisement lines.--[[User:Richie Campbell|Richie Campbell]] ([[User talk:Richie Campbell|talk]]) 00:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
Hi Angelo! There is a heavy discussion right now, in this article, [[Miss Pakistan World]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Pakistan_World here] and it was nominated for deletion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Miss_Pakistan_World here]; your opinion will be highly appreciated, especially your vote. Your participation in this matter is noteworthy, in view of the fact that you are a member of the Wiki Project Beauty Pageants. It doesn’t matter if your vote is favorable or not, but what matters most is your involvement since it seems to me that some commenter are against pageantry. Personally, I think that the article should be kept but should be freed from tremendous advertisement lines.--[[User:Richie Campbell|Richie Campbell]] ([[User talk:Richie Campbell|talk]]) 00:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Miss World 2006 == |
|||
Your recent use off rollback on this article is a breach of the conditions in which you can use it. It is for vandalism only and not content disputes. If you would even read the article on the [[Ulster Banner]] you will see that it IS NOT the flag of Northern Ireland and it should not be used to represent it. <strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span></sup>]] 08:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:53, 18 June 2008
Welcome
|
Hello Angelo Paz,
See this picture http://images4.dantri.com.vn/Uploaded/thuhang/hh2141107.jpg if you care about the truth in Wikipedia. Glebova's husband according to Wikipedia is 6'1, so she is not 5'11. N. Glebova's Ethnicity is not "white", it is "Russian".
Bsam1000 (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
About your recent reverts at Overseas Chinese
Your recent reverts at Overseas Chinese inadvertently reverted legitimate changes that addressed concerns described in the talk page. It is always a good idea to read the talk page carefully before declaring any edit vandalism. Thank you. 122.109.98.81 (talk) 10:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Matilda Mecini. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 08:09, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- FYI, I've left a message on Toddst1's talk page to clarify this, as I belive Angelo's edits fall under the BLP exception in the 3RR policy. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 08:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I do make mistakes. Sorry about that.Toddst1 (talk) 08:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
User warnings
Done. :) I think they may be sockpuppets judging by the editing patterns and the similar usernames. If the first one breaks his warning, either let me know or report at WP:AIV. If the second one breaks his warning, leave a final warning, and then AIV. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
I've granted you rollback as well, simply because you'd put it to good use reverting vandalism on the high-risk articless you edit. Plus if you're thinking of getting huggle, you need rollback to use it. Remember not to use it in edit wars, or to revert any good faith edits. They can put new users off the project (we were all new once :)). Best of luck, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Please participate
Hi Angelo! There is a heavy discussion right now, in this article, Miss Pakistan World here and it was nominated for deletion here; your opinion will be highly appreciated, especially your vote. Your participation in this matter is noteworthy, in view of the fact that you are a member of the Wiki Project Beauty Pageants. It doesn’t matter if your vote is favorable or not, but what matters most is your involvement since it seems to me that some commenter are against pageantry. Personally, I think that the article should be kept but should be freed from tremendous advertisement lines.--Richie Campbell (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Miss World 2006
Your recent use off rollback on this article is a breach of the conditions in which you can use it. It is for vandalism only and not content disputes. If you would even read the article on the Ulster Banner you will see that it IS NOT the flag of Northern Ireland and it should not be used to represent it. BigDuncTalk 08:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)