User talk:Becky Sayles
|
| This is Becky Sayles's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 |
New page reviewer granted
Hi Becky Sayles. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Great work on the swimmers! Hopefully we can find some pictures. I improved Torri Huske and we could put it up for DYK. Well done from Women in Red. Victuallers (talk) 09:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC) |
The article Bryce Mefford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability questionable. Even as skimpy as this article is, there are still unsourced claims.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2023)
Hello, Becky Sayles. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Religious philosophy • Literal translation Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|