User talk:Bellezzasolo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 196: Line 196:
here is the old page that got removed 2 years ago:
here is the old page that got removed 2 years ago:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Orbit_Culture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Orbit_Culture
It's written that "no further edits should be made to this page." so I made a new article for that. If there's anything I should do to replace the old one with this new article, let me know.
It's written that "no further edits should be made to this page." so I made a new article for that. If there's anything I should do to replace the old one with this new article, let me know. --[[User:LastRaven77|LastRaven77]] ([[User talk:LastRaven77|talk]]) 16:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

--[[User:LastRaven77|LastRaven77]] ([[User talk:LastRaven77|talk]]) 16:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
{{edit conflict}} I guess you were the one who deleted that old page so I thought maybe you can replace it with this new article.

: No, I wasn't the one who deleted the page, nor nominated it - I'm not an [[WP:Admin|Admin]], so don't have the power to delete, that was {{noping|Sandstein}}, and the nominator was admin {{noping|Anachronist}}. I just looked at the page as it was and offered my opinion, naturally I can't remember what it looked like at the time!

:That said, the page was recreated more recently, and deleted by {{u|Deb}} in February - "[[WP:A7|A7]]: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events): Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria [[WP:G4|G4]], [[WP:G11|G11]]". That said, your draft I don't think is anywhere near G11, and A7 doesn't seem to apply either, as there is at least a credible claim to importance.

:As was mentioned in the deletion discussion, the threshold you need to meet is [[WP:GNG|GNG]], where the crux of the matter is whether your sources accept self-promotional content. Looking at the sources, it's hard for me to make a judgement on that, so possibly needs bringing up at the [[WP:Reliable Sources Noticeboard|Reliable Sources Noticeboard]]. In the meantime I've had a look through the archives there - [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Thrash Hits]] mentions Metal Injection, I can't find any references to Stormbringer, ''not even on German Wikipedia''. For Distorted Sound Magazine, there's a page detailing advertising. If "full page ad" means an article, i.e. [[Sponsored Content]], that's self promotional, so the source isn't reliable. [[Metal Forces]] has its own Wikipedia page, which is promising, so I at least suspect it's worth pursuing.

: Thanks, [[User:Bellezzasolo|<span style="color: #bb9900">&#x2230;</span><span style="color: #00326a">'''Bellezzasolo'''</span><span style="color: #bb9900">&#x2721;</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Bellezzasolo|<small>Discuss</small>]] 17:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:18, 13 April 2021

Bellezzasolo

Talk

About

Editing

Contributions

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Arbitration

  • The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people, replacing the 1932 cutoff.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 20

List of users with more than 10k edits

Hello friend. I ran across your excellent work when I recently forked a user highlighter script. Here's my fork. One of the features I added to the fork was highlighting for users with more than 10k edits. I created my own JSON list of users with 10k+ edits here.

Anyway, from looking at the code, it looks like you have bots set up that do SQL queries and create a JSON user list in the correct format, running monthly. I was wondering if, instead of me re-inventing the wheel, that you might be willing to generate the 10k list on a monthly basis? It looks like you're very busy, so please only look into this if it's quick and easy for you. Here's the SQL code.

SELECT user_name FROM user WHERE user_editcount >= 10000 ORDER BY user_editcount DESC;

Thanks a lot. Looking forward to your feedback. –Novem Linguae (talk) 01:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

added TJMSmith
removed Boing! said ZebedeeHiberniantearsLear's FoolOnlyWGFinley

Interface administrator changes

added AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nuke

Template:Nuke has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Liz Read! Talk! 17:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

removed AlexandriaHappyme22RexxS

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asking a question

Hello! Hope you're alright. I was creating a page for Orbit Culture band but the old page got deleted about 2 years ago due to lack of references. This new one I created has reliable references but since the old one was already removed, I used a new title like this: Orbit Culture (band). here is the draft for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Orbit_Culture_(band) I'd appreciate it if you could look into this new one and replace it with the old one. here is the old page that got removed 2 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Orbit_Culture It's written that "no further edits should be made to this page." so I made a new article for that. If there's anything I should do to replace the old one with this new article, let me know. --LastRaven77 (talk) 16:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I guess you were the one who deleted that old page so I thought maybe you can replace it with this new article.

No, I wasn't the one who deleted the page, nor nominated it - I'm not an Admin, so don't have the power to delete, that was Sandstein, and the nominator was admin Anachronist. I just looked at the page as it was and offered my opinion, naturally I can't remember what it looked like at the time!
That said, the page was recreated more recently, and deleted by Deb in February - "A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events): Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G4, G11". That said, your draft I don't think is anywhere near G11, and A7 doesn't seem to apply either, as there is at least a credible claim to importance.
As was mentioned in the deletion discussion, the threshold you need to meet is GNG, where the crux of the matter is whether your sources accept self-promotional content. Looking at the sources, it's hard for me to make a judgement on that, so possibly needs bringing up at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. In the meantime I've had a look through the archives there - Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Thrash Hits mentions Metal Injection, I can't find any references to Stormbringer, not even on German Wikipedia. For Distorted Sound Magazine, there's a page detailing advertising. If "full page ad" means an article, i.e. Sponsored Content, that's self promotional, so the source isn't reliable. Metal Forces has its own Wikipedia page, which is promising, so I at least suspect it's worth pursuing.
Thanks, Bellezzasolo Discuss 17:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]