User talk:Cenarium: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Cenarium/Archive 5) (bot |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::I guess it wasn't so much 'decided' as suggested by {{u|Xaosflux}} to leave it in place: [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/Archive 34#Extended confirmed]]. –[[User:xeno|<b style="font-family:verdana;color:#000">xeno</b>]][[user talk:xeno|<sup style="color:#000">talk</sup>]] 17:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |
::I guess it wasn't so much 'decided' as suggested by {{u|Xaosflux}} to leave it in place: [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/Archive 34#Extended confirmed]]. –[[User:xeno|<b style="font-family:verdana;color:#000">xeno</b>]][[user talk:xeno|<sup style="color:#000">talk</sup>]] 17:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
:::I really don't care one way or the other :D I think at least one of the sysops was removing it as redundant from other sysops andI noted in [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Removal_of_permissions]] that if that group had ever been removed, we should restore it (if not already there) during a de-sysop. If they never had it, it should auto-promote. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 18:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |
:::I really don't care one way or the other :D I think at least one of the sysops was removing it as redundant from other sysops andI noted in [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Removal_of_permissions]] that if that group had ever been removed, we should restore it (if not already there) during a de-sysop. If they never had it, it should auto-promote. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 18:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
{{ping|Xaosflux}}, {{ping|xeno}}, another reason for removing them is that it makes gathering statistics much easier, for example in the queries I ran for [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Unpatrol_moved_pages|this discussion]] if admins had extendedconfirmed we would have to handle duplicates... [[User:Cenarium|Cenarium]] ([[User talk:Cenarium#top|talk]]) 18:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Administrators' newsletter - February 2017 == |
== Administrators' newsletter - February 2017 == |
Revision as of 18:48, 13 February 2017
Any sections older than 15 days are automatically archived by a bot. (current archive)
Click here to start a new talk topic
Request for lower protection levelCenarium, back in 2008 you fully protected the {{Wikt}} redirect to {{Wiktionary}}. At present, the redirect has only 1,123 transclusions and its target is transcluded 44,429 times. The target is presently template-protected, so I am hoping you would agree to lower the redirect's protection level also to template-protected? I'm a template editor, and I'd like to sort it to a maintenance category. Thank you for your consideration! Paine Ellsworth u/c 01:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Deferred revisions/ listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Deferred revisions/. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Deferred revisions/ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC) PC2 and WP:DEFERHi Cenarium, regarding, Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Make_PC2_no_longer_available_to_admins will removing this level break the WP:DEFER proposal? Is this going to actually leave this flaggedrevs configuration in place, but require new code to remove this from being "settable" ? — xaosflux Talk 00:43, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmedFYI it was decided to leave "extended confirmed" in place on admin accounts, just for ease of use during desysops. (Noticed you'd removed a few as redundant) –xenotalk 12:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
@Xaosflux:, @Xeno:, another reason for removing them is that it makes gathering statistics much easier, for example in the queries I ran for this discussion if admins had extendedconfirmed we would have to handle duplicates... Cenarium (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC) Administrators' newsletter - February 2017News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC) |