User talk:D.M.N.: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 98: Line 98:
==thx==
==thx==
for telling me. at least someone around wikipedia isnt a moron. i haven't vandalised any pages, and to be honest he got MUCH more offensive then i did. this works nothing like wikia (of which i am far more active in), so i really don't know how to report vandals on here. [[User:Kperfekt722|KP317]] 20:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
for telling me. at least someone around wikipedia isnt a moron. i haven't vandalised any pages, and to be honest he got MUCH more offensive then i did. this works nothing like wikia (of which i am far more active in), so i really don't know how to report vandals on here. [[User:Kperfekt722|KP317]] 20:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

== For reference ==
Note: [http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/couldof.html]. Cheers, <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|Jayen]]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>'' 20:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:23, 23 August 2008

"I think we really need to much more strongly insist on a pleasant work environment and ask people quite firmly not to engage in that kind of sniping and confrontational behavior. We also need to be very careful about the general mindset of "Yeah, he's a jerk but he does good work". The problem is when people act like that, they cause a lot of extra headache for a lot of people and drive away good people who don't feel like dealing with it. Those are the unseen consequences that we need to keep in mind." - Jimbo Wales at 22:51 on 5th February, 2008 - Diff
Archive
Archives
FACs needing feedback
viewedit
1914 FA Cup final Review it now



A very big congratulations!

Congrats on the JGP making FA! You deserve a lot of credit for sticking with it and making it happen! Ealdgyth - Talk 12:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar
For digging in and sticking with 1995 Japanese Grand Prix until it was an FA! Congrats! Ealdgyth - Talk 12:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good on ya! —Giggy 13:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference, etc.

Congratulations on the success of the FA nomination, and thanks for the barnstar! The Pacific GP is covered on pp.208-215, so almost correct!--Diniz(talk) 19:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those pages are correct. The current plan is to go back to university in the first week of October, but that may change. I'm also going on holiday for the first two weeks of September.--Diniz(talk) 23:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks for the HB! Replied to the e-mail. -- iMatthew T.C. 11:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1995 Pacific Grand Prix

No problem! The times for the second practice session were:

  1. David Coulthard, 1:15.730
  2. Damon Hill, 1:16.086
  3. Jean Alesi, 1:16.408
  4. Eddie Irvine, 1:16.468
  5. Gerhard Berger, 1:16.488
  6. Michael Schumacher, 1:16.681
  7. Johnny Herbert, 1:16.833
  8. Heinz-Harald Frentzen, 1:16.959
  9. Rubens Barrichello, 1:17.560
  10. Jean-Christophe Boullion, 1:17.735

This times are given on p.215.--Diniz(talk) 14:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've left some comments on the talk page.--Diniz(talk) 15:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a bit short of time right now, but I'll do it tomorrow.--Diniz(talk) 19:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right on both counts - the page number is 232 and the word should be "but". Sorry for the typo!--Diniz(talk) 19:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

I don't know what template you tried to send, but it did not work. Dalejenkins | 18:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the admin's noticeboard. Dalejenkins | 18:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:FYI

Thanks, I guess I wasn't paying attention to that. Ehh, I hate 3RR. :p lol--SRX 21:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done the copyedit, if there are any questions don't hesitate to ask. It's not mandatory or anything but tables are the only things that are exceptions to WP:OVERLINK, so you can add the links to the table if you want.--SRX 00:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome :) It was a challenge for me because it was a PPV that took place way before the new era.--SRX 14:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really in the mood for a PR now, but I took a glance at the article and it looks good. Just make sure you've taken on board the FAC feedback and acted accordingly on this article (images springs to mind, dunno if it's resolved, can't remember the specifics of what happened last time). —Giggy 08:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

95 Jap GP

Awesome work. Marvelous persistence. I'll take a look at the Pacific GP right now. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Personal attack"

I don't believe that was a personal attack, I believe it was a reference to the fact that you always seem to classify posts of mine as WP:FORUM even though they actuay have a point behind them.(also, if I'm MYSPACE in my edits, so are a ot of users) PXK T /C 18:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Danielson Userbox deletion

Made some changes, hope it's more acceptable now: can I just point out that anyone who knows anything about Bryan Danielson will understand that it is appropriate, but I can get your reasons for concern. Have deleted format section on top, as I don't want a bloody great box appearing on my userpage. Lafraisne (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1995 Pacific Grand Prix

Normally I would tell editors to go for GA to gain further input, but I do think this has a chance at FAC. If you don't want to wait a month for a good article review, and if you've incorporated all suggestions from the other FA, by all means take it to FAC. Just make sure you fix reference 4 first, with its "forecful" and "well it's (does 'a' go here?) very different point of view from 'insider' the cockpit." :-) Giants2008 (17-14) 15:41, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do let me know, as I enjoy reviewing articles like this. Giants2008 (17-14) 16:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: TNA Roster

Thanks, I just started on it the other day. I just need more reliable sources for the real names. I have enough for the ring name, if that even needs a source, but not enough for the real names. I plan on having it done by this Saturday and under peer review by Sunday. The only problem is when I place it in the article everyone is going to freak and remove it. Hopefully everyone will be fine with it but this is a bigger change than the out of universe and the ips are going to go crazy. Just keep it a secret. Next thing I know everyone is going to be on me for trying to get it to FL. The url thing is a thing I do. I just adapted it. It doesn't cause a problem really. It just gives the sources a link all the time to know the site that it came from. I just hope IGN will work for pro wrestling. It works for video game FAs i.e. (Guitar Hero (video game), hopefully they will be find with it here. But thanks for the help. I have a quick request, first have you ever worked on a video game article? If you have would you like to work with me to get TNA Impact! (video game) to FA when it is released? I was just looking for someone to work with to cut the time and work in half.--WillC 20:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I was thinking about doing that. Before it is in the article, open a section at WT:PW to tell everyone that I want to make it an FL and that the finished product is in a subpage located here. That way a agreement is made at WT:PW and I have a reason to stop IPs instead of just saying I want to expand it to FL. Though I don't believe anyone at WP:PW will disagree with expanding the article. Thanks for the cleanup when you do it. I never saw it anywhere else. I just thought about it for a second and started doing it. No one has had a problem with it yet besides you.--WillC 21:48, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thx

for telling me. at least someone around wikipedia isnt a moron. i haven't vandalised any pages, and to be honest he got MUCH more offensive then i did. this works nothing like wikia (of which i am far more active in), so i really don't know how to report vandals on here. KP317 20:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For reference

Note: [1]. Cheers, Jayen466 20:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]