User talk:Dev0745

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dev0745! Thank you for your contributions. I am K6ka and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, - (Dev0745 (talk) 15:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC))

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dev0745. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dev0745. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Karma Puja

An article that you have been involved in editing—Karma Puja—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, both are related. Puja(worship) take place in karam/Karma festival is called Karma puja. It should be merge.Dev0745 (talk) 01:53, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Gotra. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Title of Nagvanshi dynasty

Hi, I think you should change the article name of Nagvanshi dynasty to "Nagvanshis of Chotanagpur" because it might get confused with the Nagas of Padmavati who were also Nagvanshi. Well done for your good work on the article!213.205.194.131 (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Naga and Nagvanshi are different. Nagavanshi are descendant of Naga. Thanks for recommendation.(Dev0745 (talk) 02:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC))

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dev0745

Thank you for creating Ramchandra Chandravanshi.

User:Dl2000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for your work in creating Indian politician pages such as Ramchandra Chandravanshi. For future work, you may want to consider inclusion of reliable sources such as major newspapers and media outlets or other appropriate publications. Hope this review helps.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dl2000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dl2000 (talk) 01:33, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks... Dev0745 (talk) 01:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Girdhari Ram Ganjhu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Girdhari Ram Ganjhu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv🍁 17:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Tea-garden community of Assam

Hi, I've reverted the cut-and-paste move of Tea-tribe of Assam. If you would like to see reverted the other editor's earlier move away from Tea-tribe of Assam, you can place a request at WP:RMT. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your edits on "Pashtuns"

Hello Dev0745, What you are doing now is just plain ignoring the talk page on this "Sheen Khalai" Quetta Ladies matter. Please read the first parts and last parts of the "Disputed source" section on the talk page. This claim that you are doing is WP:EXTRAORDINARY. These ladies claim the Pashtun identity despite having Punjabi ancestry. They identify as "Hindu Pashtuns" affirming with language and some cultural aspects. Yes they are called "Hindu Pashtun" most of time because that is how someone should identify them due to their language (Billingual with Punjabi (dialects) at home) and culture as you can also see here for an example: Multi-tongued: Peshawar’s happy Hindus and Sikhs. And those Quetta Hindu ladies themselves admit their Punjabi ancestry in your source too, also here they themselves confirm it in their book: From Quetta to Delhi: A Partition Story so if they themselves confirm it, who are we then to ignore this? But what we are following now is a consensus what Dough weller first did: mentioning them in the separate religion section as he did here [1]. Also user:Uanfala made this proposal in the talk page so you can read that. So it will stay like that.

This claim is very extraordinary in every reliable ethnographic source there is no mentioning of Hinduism among Pashtuns. If you can find a reliable ethnographic source (like these e.g. [2][3]) that mentions the existence of a hindu minority among the Pashtun ethnic group, be our guest and change the religion infobox :) Till now not even a single one is out there mentioning them. Every source mentions only this: Sunni majority with a shia minority (in the thousands) even some ethnographic sources mention the few christian converts. so this WP:EXCEPTIONAL claim needs just an ethnographic source and you can change it however you want. Even User:El_C won't hold you. Thank you and hope this helps Casperti (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks..I didn't notice talk page. She mentioned that they are pasthun and belongs to Kakar tribe. Their family were claiming Punjabi Hindu to fit in mainstream culture. But according to her they are Pasthun belongs to Kakar tribe. As I can see, she had also mentioned they belongs to Khatri caste. May be her parents were saying they are Khatri but later she discovered that she is pasthun. Anything can be possible.. Also your given sources are limited and taken out of context.

I will going to add news articles in the religion section for source of the claim.. In news articles it is mentioned that they are Pasthun belongs to Kakar tribe..

There is no date about Pasthun hindu, so there is no need to add Hindu religion in infobox..

Thanks..(Dev0745 (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC));

Thank you for understanding the talk page, their claim is extraordinary as Hinduism nowhere to be found in reliable ethnographic sources. This young girl is making a claim in a news paper, which is very dubious. Afghan/"Pashtun" Hindus are Khatri hindus that speak Western Punjabi dialects at home (Called Hindko alltogether in Pashto) in Khatri's you have a clan called Kakkar maybe that girl is confusing that with Kakar, I dont know though so yeah. What we do know is that In their book these Quetta ladies admit their Punjabi ancestry but identify themselves as "Pashtun Hindus" due to their culture and billingual Pashto language they have/had. Anyways, have a nice day fellow editor Dev0745 :) Casperti (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Any thing can be possible..thanks Dev0745 (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to North East Delhi riots. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thanks. Taukeerppw (talk) 06:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

thanks for your suggestion.. Dev0745 (talk) 08:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 El_C 07:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Too poorly-written

I refer you to submissions such as Protesters stared protesting in Jafarabad area with aim of blocking roads of Delhi and to case traffic jam. Or, In Shaheen Bagh protests, Protesters blocked roads causing traffick jam and suffering for common people. Those are simply too poorly-written. I'm sorry, but competency is required on Wikipedia, which includes command of the English language. El_C 07:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Your recent editing history at North East Delhi riots shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

With your recent revert. You have already violated wP:1RR. Requested you to self revert and remove the disputed content or you risk getting blocked by an admin for violating wP:1RR ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 08:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at North East Delhi riots. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SerTanmay (talk) 11:46, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

I was arranging chronologically. Dev0745 (talk) 13:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at North East Delhi riots shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
With [4] and [5] edits, you have broken WP:1RR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SerTanmay (talk • contribs)

Again, how do these two diffs constitute reverts, SerTanmay? That said, Dev0745, I am very close to banning you from the IPA topic area altogether if you don't drastically shape up. Especially in terms of misrepresenting sources and adding poorly-written content. You need to start doing better — much better. There will be no further warnings. Thanks and good luck. El_C 18:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

thanks for your suggestion.. Dev0745 (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

El C, they revert [6]. SerTanmay (talk) 19:19, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at North East Delhi riots, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. In [7], you added the line 'Anti-CAA protestors' (stating in your edit summary "as per source") while the source clearly says "Protesters wearing masks and waving swords clash with police." Your POV pushing will not do here. El_C, please note how sourced info is gradually being shifted to change the POV. SerTanmay (talk) 05:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Although protesters clashing were anti CAA protesters, but sources don't mention it. Thanks..Dev0745 (talk) 06:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Topic-banned from all pages and discussions related to Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, including the associated protests

You have been sanctioned for continued POV, tendentious and disruptive editing in this topic-area, despite prior warnings.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. El_C 14:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)