User talk:Devansh.negi

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Conjugate, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Conjugate was changed by Devansh.negi (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-04-06T05:41:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Conjugate, you will be blocked from editing. Template:Do not delete Goodvac (talk) 05:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Talk:Conjugation. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Zhang He (talk) 06:06, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Devansh.negi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

intention was to be very descriptive about the article,had no intention for any form of advertising, kindly unblock me and undo the deletion of the article

Decline reason:

Whatever your intention, you created and reverted back to an advertisement, despite multiple warnings. Unless you can display that you're aware that this is wrong and you can promise not to use Wikipedia for advertising in future, you must remain blocked. ⇦REDVERS⇨ Say NO to Commons bullying 08:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Devansh.negi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

newbie to this editing and article writing, didn't realize that the messages were automated or a warning and I promise for no advertising in future, i would adhere to the terms and conditions of Wikipedia, for any editing ill take a prior permission from the administrator for clarity

Decline reason:

At this point we cannot trust you to write about Conjugate any further: you obviously have a conflict of interest based on your posts. You would need to meet the conditions you agreed to: no advertising, and abiding by Wikipedia policies, but in addition you would need to promise to avoid any further editing at all on this topic, and justify that Wikipedia stands to gain something from unblocking you by explaining what you might contribute that would be of value. Mango juice^talk 03:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not 100% clear- are you agreeing to avoid writing about your business in the future? What other subjects are you interested in writing about? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]