User talk:Djm-leighpark: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 68: Line 68:


:I can carry this over to AN, if you'd like. Is this unblock request what you'd like to be posted? — [[User:Ingenuity|Ingenuity]] ([[User talk:Ingenuity#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Ingenuity|contribs]]) 12:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
:I can carry this over to AN, if you'd like. Is this unblock request what you'd like to be posted? — [[User:Ingenuity|Ingenuity]] ([[User talk:Ingenuity#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Ingenuity|contribs]]) 12:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

@{{Ping|Ingenuity}}: That would be fantastic, I confess to being a little frustrated seeing it sitting here stalled and nothing happening and wondering what and when will something happen next, its been a little mentally stressing. I think carry over the request warts and all as it is to AN and hopefully I can address any questions asked of me to people's satisfaction. Thankyou. -- [[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]](DeirgeDel)<sup>[[User talk:Djm-leighpark| t]]</sup><sub>[[:m:User:DeirgeDel/A|a]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Djm-leighpark|c]]</sup> 16:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:21, 8 June 2023

is closed. @HJ Mitchell:, user has left you a bequest. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Downsizing (property) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia should not be turned into a dictionary nor a "How To" guide. Apart from these two, this article contains no encyclopaedic information of any value to the reader.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — kashmīrī TALK 01:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is convincing enough that I'd like to restore TPA. Don't recall if there is a CBAN. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: What say ye? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do we need a check user? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1096#User:Djm-leighpark bullying seems to be the ANI that resulted in the block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring TPA con permiso El C. Noting El C wishes to not be pinged. Djm-leighpark, please do not ping El C or anyone else for that matter to your talk page. This will likely need to go to the Admin's Notice Board. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou Deepfriedokra. -- Djm-leighpark(DeirgeDel) tac 22:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration of alternative accounts

Djm-leighpark(DeirgeDel) tac 22:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request 28 May 2023

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Djm-leighpark (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My editing merited a block because I was incorrect to challenge an administrator as I did following block following the 16 April 2022 ANI; even if I felt convinced I had due cause. The fact this arose out of harassment by a block-evading sock is in many ways irrelevant - I accept I needed to maintain better control even in this and other difficult situations and I had overly-harassed the sock myself in that case before the sockpuppetry was known. I acknowledge with shame some of my earlier interactions with administrators (and others) in some pressure situations: most especially in some cases where I was totally wrong. I also need to avoid the use of slang, as identified in of one (or more) of my blocks. I will focus in the future to ensure problems are raised calmly through the proper channels and processes and avoid BATTLEGROUND and CIR.

For constructive edits on the English Wikipedia I would expect to be improving a range of articles though I regard my particular areas of interest are Irish Railway History, some biographies (mostly non-blp e.g. engineers and whatever the BBC news website throws up), local/Irish settlement articles, and local/Irish river systems. In particular I am keen to improve article sourcing and have been accumulating books and and identifying books online for this purpose. I would resume doing anti-vandal work etc. Regardless of the outcome of this appeal I (as DeirgeDel) expect to continue activity on Wikidata, Commons, enWQ and gaWP but would likely avoid :simpleWP as too difficult!

If possible I would like to request a Standard Offer please.

Thankyou in anticipation and feel free to ask any specific questions. -- Djm-leighpark(DeirgeDel) tac 00:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My alternate accounts :DeirgeDel, Bigdelboy, Djm-mobile, DeirgeBot

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My editing merited a block because I was incorrect to challenge an administrator as I did following [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1096#User:Djm-leighpark_bullying block following the 16 April 2022 ANI]; even if I felt convinced I had due cause. The fact this arose out of harassment by [[:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/World's Lamest Critic/Archive|a block-evading sock]] is in many ways irrelevant - I accept I needed to maintain better control even in this and other difficult situations and I had overly-harassed the sock myself in that case before the sockpuppetry was known. I acknowledge with shame some of my earlier interactions with administrators (and others) in some pressure situations: most especially in some cases where I was totally wrong. I also need to avoid the use of slang, as identified in of one (or more) of my blocks. I will focus in the future to ensure problems are raised calmly through the proper channels and processes and avoid BATTLEGROUND and CIR. For constructive edits on the English Wikipedia I would expect to be improving a range of articles though I regard my particular areas of interest are Irish Railway History, some biographies (mostly non-blp e.g. engineers and whatever the BBC news website throws up), local/Irish settlement articles, and local/Irish river systems. In particular I am keen to improve article sourcing and have been accumulating books and and identifying books online for this purpose. I would resume doing anti-vandal work etc. Regardless of the outcome of this appeal I (as DeirgeDel) expect to continue activity on Wikidata, Commons, enWQ and gaWP but would likely avoid :simpleWP as too difficult! If possible I would like to request a Standard Offer please. Thankyou in anticipation and feel free to ask any specific questions. -- [[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]](DeirgeDel)<sup>[[User talk:Djm-leighpark| t]]</sup><sub>[[:m:User:DeirgeDel/A|a]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Djm-leighpark|c]]</sup> 00:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC) : <span style="font-size:85%;">My alternate accounts :DeirgeDel, Bigdelboy, Djm-mobile, DeirgeBot</span> |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My editing merited a block because I was incorrect to challenge an administrator as I did following [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1096#User:Djm-leighpark_bullying block following the 16 April 2022 ANI]; even if I felt convinced I had due cause. The fact this arose out of harassment by [[:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/World's Lamest Critic/Archive|a block-evading sock]] is in many ways irrelevant - I accept I needed to maintain better control even in this and other difficult situations and I had overly-harassed the sock myself in that case before the sockpuppetry was known. I acknowledge with shame some of my earlier interactions with administrators (and others) in some pressure situations: most especially in some cases where I was totally wrong. I also need to avoid the use of slang, as identified in of one (or more) of my blocks. I will focus in the future to ensure problems are raised calmly through the proper channels and processes and avoid BATTLEGROUND and CIR. For constructive edits on the English Wikipedia I would expect to be improving a range of articles though I regard my particular areas of interest are Irish Railway History, some biographies (mostly non-blp e.g. engineers and whatever the BBC news website throws up), local/Irish settlement articles, and local/Irish river systems. In particular I am keen to improve article sourcing and have been accumulating books and and identifying books online for this purpose. I would resume doing anti-vandal work etc. Regardless of the outcome of this appeal I (as DeirgeDel) expect to continue activity on Wikidata, Commons, enWQ and gaWP but would likely avoid :simpleWP as too difficult! If possible I would like to request a Standard Offer please. Thankyou in anticipation and feel free to ask any specific questions. -- [[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]](DeirgeDel)<sup>[[User talk:Djm-leighpark| t]]</sup><sub>[[:m:User:DeirgeDel/A|a]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Djm-leighpark|c]]</sup> 00:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC) : <span style="font-size:85%;">My alternate accounts :DeirgeDel, Bigdelboy, Djm-mobile, DeirgeBot</span> |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My editing merited a block because I was incorrect to challenge an administrator as I did following [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1096#User:Djm-leighpark_bullying block following the 16 April 2022 ANI]; even if I felt convinced I had due cause. The fact this arose out of harassment by [[:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/World's Lamest Critic/Archive|a block-evading sock]] is in many ways irrelevant - I accept I needed to maintain better control even in this and other difficult situations and I had overly-harassed the sock myself in that case before the sockpuppetry was known. I acknowledge with shame some of my earlier interactions with administrators (and others) in some pressure situations: most especially in some cases where I was totally wrong. I also need to avoid the use of slang, as identified in of one (or more) of my blocks. I will focus in the future to ensure problems are raised calmly through the proper channels and processes and avoid BATTLEGROUND and CIR. For constructive edits on the English Wikipedia I would expect to be improving a range of articles though I regard my particular areas of interest are Irish Railway History, some biographies (mostly non-blp e.g. engineers and whatever the BBC news website throws up), local/Irish settlement articles, and local/Irish river systems. In particular I am keen to improve article sourcing and have been accumulating books and and identifying books online for this purpose. I would resume doing anti-vandal work etc. Regardless of the outcome of this appeal I (as DeirgeDel) expect to continue activity on Wikidata, Commons, enWQ and gaWP but would likely avoid :simpleWP as too difficult! If possible I would like to request a Standard Offer please. Thankyou in anticipation and feel free to ask any specific questions. -- [[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]](DeirgeDel)<sup>[[User talk:Djm-leighpark| t]]</sup><sub>[[:m:User:DeirgeDel/A|a]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Djm-leighpark|c]]</sup> 00:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC) : <span style="font-size:85%;">My alternate accounts :DeirgeDel, Bigdelboy, Djm-mobile, DeirgeBot</span> |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
I can carry this over to AN, if you'd like. Is this unblock request what you'd like to be posted? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 12:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@Ingenuity:: That would be fantastic, I confess to being a little frustrated seeing it sitting here stalled and nothing happening and wondering what and when will something happen next, its been a little mentally stressing. I think carry over the request warts and all as it is to AN and hopefully I can address any questions asked of me to people's satisfaction. Thankyou. -- Djm-leighpark(DeirgeDel) tac 16:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]