User talk:IagoQnsi

File:CGP Grey stick figure.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CGP Grey stick figure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Matr1x-101$_{when-replying}^{Ping-me}$ {_{user page @ commons} - ^talk - _contribs} 16:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:0x10c logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:0x10c logo.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Wanda Dalla Costa Revision

Hello,

You have previously made a revision to the Wanda Dalla Costa page back to the original and have taken off images. If I am able to provide you with the email evidence of permissions, am I able to reinput the images that were removed?

Thank you kindly, Karrgo9224! Karrgo9224! (talk) 19:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you can prove copyright ownership of those images by emailing the Volunteer Response Team. Here's an automatic tool you can use to generate that email: Wikimedia VRT release generator. Best, IagoQnsi (talk) 19:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NYCFC stadium rendering 2022-11-16.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NYCFC stadium rendering 2022-11-16.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

I just want you to know that a large number of articles are severely biased

Hi, around March 2016, you once told me that "Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view". I would only like to point out that certain topics on Wikipedia (I am specifially referring to religious demographics (i.e. the composition of religious groups in a country or territory)) are very heavily biased towards very specific viewpoints that go completely going against Wikipedia's principle of a "Neutral point of view". What I am refering to is that articles about countries' religious demographics are somehow now biased towards either a heavily secularist bias or are biased towards minority groups. I just hope you can understand and help spread the message to others. Belson 303 (talk) 18:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)