User talk:Josethewikier
CS1 error on Lai Ching-te
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lai Ching-te, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please revert my edit if it is counterproductive, thank you! Joséthewikier (talk) 07:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red
Hi there, Joséthewikier, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. When you feel inspired to create your first biography of a woman, you'll find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. You might like to add {{User WikiProject Women in Red}} to your user page. Please let me know if your run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- thank you, wilco! Joséthewikier (talk) 04:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Ipigott (talk) 11:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- amazing! Joséthewikier (talk) 18:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Selfstudier (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Joséthewikier (talk) 04:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Just an FYI
Should've included MOS:SEMICOLON in my edit description for this revert. Cerebral726 (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue