User talk:Kauffner: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
Kauffner (talk | contribs)
add
Line 1: Line 1:
Back in June, I was a top Wikipedia contributer with a clean record. (I was [[WP:List of Wikipedians by number of edits | ranked No. 1455]], to be exact.) A few weeks later, I had an indefinite block. I never got a warning template, nor was my case ever considered at ANI, Arbcom, DRM, or anywhere else. In short, it was a total hit job. IP vandals get more due process than I did. If any other editor has ever been blocked for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han-Nom&diff=563875554&oldid=563485374 reverting the blanking of an article he wrote], it has escaped my notice.
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for '''disruptive and tendentious editing and continued edit-warring'''. Per our discussion above you returned to the same article and performed the same edit that resulted in your previous block despite knowing it was against the current consensus to do so. You continue to label those that disagree with you as vandals and accuse other editors of harassment, which is a form or personal attack. I provided plenty of opportunity for you to simply revert your restoration of the article and seek consensus, however you have chosen not to do so and therefore you have been blocked for 2 weeks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. &nbsp;[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 23:34, 11 July 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
{{unblock reviewed | 1=This is a two-week block for a single edit that reverted a page blanking.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han-Nom&diff=563875554&oldid=563485374] "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits...such as page blanking", is explicitly given as an exception to the 3RR principle in [[WP:3RRNO]]. Even if I reverted these blankings four times a day, which I never have, I would still be following the guideline. If this article was really "against consensus", it would have been deleted at AFD a long time ago. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 05:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC) | decline=Restoring a redirect is not blanking, and is therefore not vandalism, and is therefore not exempt. The block is valid in face, and there's no valid reason for unblock provided in the unblock request ([[User talk:Bwilkins|✉→]]<span style="font-family:Forte, cursive, sans-serif;color:black">[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|←✎]]) 15:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)}}
:The blanking exception only applies if the blanking is an act of defacement. Redirecting an article as a result of the discussion is not vandalism, even if the others are wrong in claiming consensus (no comment on whether they are or not). You don't have an exemption here. But I'm going to leave your unblock request for another admin to answer because I think it best we get more eyes than just mine and Ponyo's on this situation. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 05:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
*Kauffner, your unblock request fails on two fronts; the most glaring is that the restoration of a redirect is not "blanking", and as you have been told before, it is not vandalism. Your contention that the editors restoring the redirect are "vandals" and your continued habit of calling them so is against [[WP:NPA|NPA]], as are your repeated accusations (such as at the recent [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive803#Re-creation of Han-Nom|ANI thread]]) of harassment, stalking, and purposeful destruction of your work. You have turned this into a war with yourself playing the role of victim instead of pursuing [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] and abiding by consensus even if it doesn't work in your favour. A redirect is a completely valid outcome of a discussion, and you dictating that it either ''must'' be kept or go through AfD is not supported in practice or by policy. --[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 14:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
::I was looking at what happens to other users accused of editing warring. They usually get a templated or something like that. Of course I'm going react if an article I wrote gets blanked -- or am I really supposed to say, "restoration of a redirect"? I googled {{google|"restoration of a redirect" site:en.wikipedia.org}} and got zero hits. In other words, this phrase was created just to use against me. This whole episode reeks of bullying. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 19:24, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
:::Are you saying you wanted me to template you as a warning instead of taking the time to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKauffner&diff=563984644&oldid=563982334 discuss your actions] with you and giving you ample opportunity to revert? Are you also saying that the term "restoring a redirect" on Wikipedia was devised solely as a tool to bully you? Was its use on over [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=all&search=%22restore+the+redirect%22&fulltext=Search a thousand pages] on Wikipedia also an attack on you? Your arguments hold no water and are only serving to convince me that the two week block period will not prevent further disruption and edit-warring from you. You seem to believe that individuals who disagree with you or attempt to hold you to Wikipedia policy are all part of some grand conspiracy, and as long as you continue to approach it as such you will never be happy editing here as you will see an enemy in every corner. --[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 20:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
::::I take from the above that you think I am thoroughly paranoid, and that I was allowed to make 36,000 edits over eight years without being cited for edit warring before due an unfortunate oversight. You've given someone else a no-warning two-week block for one revert? You certainly seem defensive about it if this is really standard procedure. It's no secret is that if you want to get rid of an editor, you can attack some otherwise obscure article he wrote, and he will of course react. I don't know any policy that says I have to accept a merger whenever two or three editors get together on a talk page and agree among themselves. Finally, I must say that I am most impressed with the credentials on your user page, and flattered by the personal attention I am receiving. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 01:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
:::::I for one know you are not paranoid about this at all, and have every reason to feel the way you do. Been there on a regular basis with the editor but nothing ever happens with my complaints. Good luck in getting someone to care. [[User:Fyunck(click)|Fyunck(click)]] ([[User talk:Fyunck(click)|talk]]) 06:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)


I don’t see anything controversial about the article in question myself, and I find it unlikely anyone would object to it if someone other than me had written it. But here it is, so judge for yourself:
==Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts==
{{Ivmbox
|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kauffner]], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to investigations]], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]]
}} [[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 16:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


== Han-Nom AFD ==


==[[Han-Nom]]: A suspended Wikipedia article==
I'm sorry you're disappointed with the result, but it was clear that consensus had already been reached before the AFD even began and nothing you might say at the AFD would be likely to change it. And your block doesn't expire until after the AFD's 7-day period would have been over anyway, so you wouldn't have had a chance to comment anyway. [[User:Angr|Angr]] ([[User talk:Angr|talk]]) 12:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
[[File:Nom Character V04-5055.svg|thumb|200px|This is the Han-Nom character for ''[[pho|phở]]'', a popular soup made from rice noodles. It is scheduled for inclusion in an upcoming extension of Unicode.<ref name=CJK-pho/> The radical {{vi-nom|{{linktext|米}}}} on the left suggests that the meaning of the character is linked to rice. The remainder {{vi-nom|{{linktext|頗}}}} is a phonetic, a Chinese character used to indicate pronunciation.]]
:You are oddly well-versed and opinionated about this particular nomination. I see the occasional vote at AFD, but it does not appear that you ordinarily close this type of discussion. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 14:48, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
'''Hán-Nôm''', or '''Sino-Vietnamese characters''',<ref name=Langenscheidt/> are characters that were commonly used in Vietnam from the second century BC until the early 20th century. The script could be used to write either [[Classical Chinese]] ({{lang|vi|''Hán văn''}}), or a form of Vietnamese called [[Chữ nôm|Nom]] ({{lang|vi|''chữ Nôm''}}).<ref name=Hoang/><ref name=Noboyuki/> It includes both [[Chinese characters]] and characters based on the principles of Chinese writing, but particular to Vietnam.


Han was used by the court and for other official purposes, following the practice of the Chinese government at that time. The [[Temple of Literature, Hanoi|Temple of Literature]] in Hanoi was the best-known school for the study of Chinese. Students typically studied to pass the [[Confucian examination system in Vietnam|civil service examinations]] so that they might become magistrates.
== Continued sockpuppetry ==


In Nom, Chinese characters are used to write Vietnamese. A Vietnamese word can be written using a Chinese character for a word with a similar meaning or pronunciation. It is thus an [[ideographic]] script, although each character represents only one syllable. Vietnamese is a tonal language, and it has far more distinct syllables than other East Asian languages do.<ref name=Hanna/> Japanese and Korean, both non-tonal languages, developed phonetic scripts to supplement Chinese-based script long before Vietnam did.
Your block has been extended to one month from today for continued sockpuppetry. [[User:Someguy1221|Someguy1221]] ([[User talk:Someguy1221|talk]]) 22:35, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
:A month....I guess [[User:EdJohnston]] is still holding a grudge on account of the [[Duc Duc]] move. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 09:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
::You've been discovered socking again. If you're not going to edit by the rules, you're not going to be able to edit at all. I've extended your block to indefinite. If you want to be unblocked someday, I suggest you read [[WP:OFFER|the standard offer]] and abide by it, particularly the "NO SOCKING" part. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 15:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
:::Why does Wikipedia need Arbcom or ANI anyway? I am sure things will go more smoothly now that you're in charge. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 15:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
::::Feel free to appeal this to ArbCom. That option is always available to you at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. But I can pretty surely predict that you aren't going to get any sympathy from them fresh off of socking. As for me being in charge, don't be ridiculous. Any admin would have extended your block after you were caught socking. That's routine at Wikipedia. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 00:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


In the 1920s, Han-Nom was replaced by [[Vietnamese alphabet]], a Latin-based script that indicates tone. Unlike [[South Korea]] and [[Japan]], modern Vietnam does not require students to study the traditional characters.<ref name="Hoang" /> Fewer than 100 scholars worldwide can read Nom.<ref name="whatisnom" /> However, Han-Nom calligraphy remains popular as a home decoration and as a symbol of good luck.<ref name="Hoang" /> The Han-Nom Research Institute in Hanoi, founded in 1970, collects and studies relevant manuscripts.<ref name="Noboyuki" /> It has also created a standard for computer encoding.
:::::As you may recall, my case was being discussed [[WP:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive803#Re-creation_of_Han-Nom | at ANI]] at the time of your original three-day block. That counter-ANI block was used to justify a series additional blocks. Ponyo wrote on July 12 that he wanted to extend my block, so perhaps that was that was plan. You've obviously had a grudge against me since [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive794#LittleBenW_violating_his_TBAN_again... | this]]. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 07:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
{{Infobox Chinese
::::::Except that I had forgotten the existence of that coversation. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 10:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
|vie= Hán Nôm
::::::OK, I've read it again. No, there's no grudge there. Nor is there involvement, as I did not get into conflict with you there. I just characterized your behaviour (along with several others'), just as one might when warning a user. But apparently I'm not the only one you accuse of having a grudge, what with your accusation against EdJohnston above. If you're putting me in his company, I'm fine with that. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 12:26, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
|hn= {{linktext|漢|喃}}
:::::::Am I to understand from the above that you had no idea who I was when you blocked me, and that the block was strictly about the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han-Nom&oldid=563875554 Han-Nom] article, and nothing to do with diacritics? [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 16:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
}}
::::::::I knew you opposed diacritics, sure. I had no memory of having made that particular comment, though. Having re-read it, I note that, while I have indeed seen a lot more battleground behaviour from the anti-diacritic side, I actually don't care a whole heck of a lot about whether diacritics appear in article titles; it's always seemed a pointless fight to me. (The fact that I sign my name with a diacritic has no bearing on that.) As for the second half of your question, yes, that's exactly the case. That block was entirely for edit warring on that article. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 16:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::I hope this is a conspiracy, as Ponyo alluded to above. If your real point of view is that writing an article and blanking one are two equally valid methods of contributing to Wikipedia, that would be so clueless. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 12:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
::::::::::To be clear, I alluded no such thing. My exact words were "You seem to believe that individuals who disagree with you or attempt to hold you to Wikipedia policy are all part of some grand conspiracy, and as long as you continue to approach it as such you will never be happy editing here as you will see an enemy in every corner". In other words, by constantly pointing fingers and refusing to see fault in your own actions you have become the harbinger of your own Wikipedia doom.--[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 15:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)


== History ==
I shall make a helpful comment. Or so I hope. K: lots of your recent comments, and most obviously "I hope this is a conspiracy, as Ponyo alluded to above" are fairly transparent lawyering / attempts at wedging. You're kind of deliberately misrepresenting people, in the hope of getting them to say something that they don't really mean, in an attempt to allow you to pounce on irrelevant details and weasel your way out of your troubles. All of that is completely pointless, a waste of time, and counter productive. I think you have two choices at this point: actually behave, talk like an honest civilised human being and not like a lawyer; or fall off into sock-puppet-land and be forever lost [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] ([[User talk:William M. Connolley|talk]]) 21:57, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Chinese characters were introduced to Vietnam after the [[Han Empire]] conquered the country in 111 BC. Independence was achieved in 939, but the Chinese writing system was adopted for official purposes in 1010.<ref name="Hanna" /> A bell engraved in 1076 is the earliest known example of a Nom inscription.<ref name="Manh" /> [[Nguyen Thuyen]], who composed poetry in the 13th century, is sometimes given credit as the creator of Nom. However, none of his work has survived.<ref name="Hanna" /> The oldest surviving Nom text is the collected poetry of Emperor [[Tran Nhan Tong]] written in the 13th century.<ref name="Tong" /> The Ming occupation of Vietnam (1407-1428) was highly destructive, and few Nom inscriptions survive from earlier times.<ref name="McLeod" /> [[Nguyen Trai]] (1380–1442) wrote both Han and Nom literature in the 15th century.<ref name="McLeod" /> Trinh Thi Ngoc Truc, consort of King [[Le Than Tong]], is given credit for a 24,000 character bilingual Han-to-Nom dictionary written in the 17th century.<ref name=chu/>
:EdJohnston apparently took IIO's rants against me at face value, and his June 18 block actually cites them. Perhaps he didn't think a week was a long enough, or maybe he didn't care for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKauffner&diff=560545535&oldid=560480494 my response to his block]. Either way, I had a clean record before that. Since then, its been one block after another, and the admins involved don't necessarily bother to give rationales that make any sense. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 12:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
[[File:Nhật dụng thường đàm, p. 38.jpg|thumb|A page from the bilingual dictionary ''Nhật dụng thường đàm'' (1851). Characters representing words in ''Hán'' (Chinese) are explained in ''Nôm'' (Vietnamese).]]


Unlike Han, Nom was not studied or classified systematically for most of its history.<ref name="Marr141" /> Instead, authors who had studied Chinese applied the principles of Chinese writing to their native language. Although official records were generally kept in Han, Nom was used under two short-lived dynasties, the [[Ho dynasty]] (1400-1407) and the [[Tay Son]] (1778–1802). In 1838, [[Jean-Louis Taberd]] wrote a Nom dictionary that eventually gained wide acceptance and circulation.<ref name="Taberd" /> In 1867, Catholic scholar [[Nguyen Truong To]] petitioned King [[Tu Duc]] to replace Han with Nom. The king did not consent to this, but he did respond with various efforts to promote Nom. A decree was issued which praised the script as ''Quốc Âm'' (the national voice), as opposed to ''chữ Nôm'' (chattering).<ref name="Dinh" />
== ''The Signpost'': 31 July 2013 ==
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-07-29}}
</div><!--Volume 9, Issue 30-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]'''
* [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]]
* [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 02:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0589 -->


In the 19th century, there was a flowering of popular literature written in Nom, including such classics as [[Nguyen Du]]'s ''[[The Tale of Kieu]]'' and the poetry of [[Ho Xuan Huong]]. Although only 3 to 5 percent of the population was literate,<ref name="Hanna78" /> nearly every village had someone who could read Nom aloud for the benefit of other villagers.<ref name="Marr142A" />
===[[Berlin Central Station]]===


In Korea and Japan, the traditional writing system was simplified so it could be taught to the general public.<ref name="Marr141-2" /> These nations created only a few hundred original characters.<ref name="Hanna" /> Vietnam's educated class looked down on Nom as inferior to Han, so it was not interested in doing the work required to turn Nom into a form of writing suitable for mass communication.<ref name="Marr142" /> Like Chinese, Vietnamese is a tonal language and has nearly 5,000 distinct syllables.<ref name="Hanna" /> Neither the Korean nor the Japanese writing systems indicate tones, so they cannot be applied to the Vietnamese language.<ref name="Marr141" /> As in Chinese, a semantic meaning is attributed to every syllable. This characteristic of the language may be can considered a result of the traditional writing system.<ref name="Hanna77" />
There is a discussion about moving [[Berlin Central Station]] to [[Berlin Hauptbahnhof]] [[Talk:Berlin Central Station|here]]. --[[User:Bermicourt|Bermicourt]] ([[User talk:Bermicourt|talk]]) 12:59, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


As additional characters were created by combining pre-existing elements, Nom grew more complex.<ref name="Hanna" /> One element might suggest Vietnamese pronunciation, while the other could be derived from a Chinese character with similar meaning. For example, the reading ''ba'' is indicated by the character {{vi-nom|{{linktext|巴}}}}. In Chinese, this character indicates the same sound as in Vietnamese, but it's meaning is unrelated: "to long for". For the character {{vi-nom|{{linktext|𠀧}}}} (⿺{{vi-nom|{{linktext|巴|三}}}}), horizontal lines are added to indicate that the meaning is "three." "Father" is also ''ba'', but written as {{vi-nom|{{linktext|爸}} (⿰{{linktext|父|巴}}}}). "Turtle" is ''con ba ba'' ({{vi-nom|{{linktext|昆|蚆|蚆}}; ⿰{{linktext|虫巴}}}}). The Chinese also combined phonetic and semantic elements to create Han characters in ancient times. As the correspondence between sound and meaning is different in Vietnamese than it is in ancient Chinese, Nom involved the creation of thousands of additional characters. A set of nearly 20,000 characters has been proposed for a computer encoding standard, over 6,000 of these specific to Vietnam.<ref name="Ngo" /><ref name="KiemChar" />
:IIO and I once had a partnership to translate Hebrew and Latin titles. So there is no issue of principle in any of this. It's just his way of getting back at me, and now apparently you as well. I hope you do a better job of dealing with it than I did. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 13:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
[[File:Han-nom parallel.png|thumb|left|The blue script is modern Vietnamese ({{lang|vi|''quốc ngữ''}}), while the characters in brown and green are Han-Nom. It says, "My mother eats vegetarian food at the temple every Sunday."<ref name="mother" />]]
Beginning in the late 19th century, the French colonial authorities promoted the use of the Vietnamese alphabet, which they viewed as a stepping stone toward learning French. Language reform movements in other Asian nations stimulated Vietnamese interest in the subject. Following the [[Russo-Japanese War]] of 1905, Japan was increasingly cited as a model for modernization. The Confucian education system was compared unfavorably to the Japanese system of public education. According to a polemic by writer [[Phan Boi Chau]], "so-called Confucian scholars" lacked knowledge of the modern world, as well as real understanding of Han literature. Their degrees showed only that they had learned how to write characters, he claimed.<ref name="phan" />


The popularity of Hanoi's short-lived [[Tonkin Free School]] suggested that broad reform was possible. In 1910, the colonial school system adopted a "Franco-Vietnamese curriculum", which emphasized French and alphabetic Vietnamese. The teaching of Chinese characters was discontinued in 1917.<ref name="Chung" /> On December 28, 1918, Emperor [[Khai Dinh]] declared that the traditional writing system no longer had official status.<ref name="Chung" /> The civil service exam was given for the last time at the imperial capital of [[Huế|Hue]] on January 4, 1919.<ref name="Chung" /> The examination system, and the education system based on it, had been in effect for almost 900 years.<ref name="Chung" /> China itself abandoned Han soon afterward as part of the [[May Fourth Movement]].
== ''The Signpost'': 07 August 2013 ==


In more recent times, Han-Nom has been a focus of calligraphy.<ref name="HoiAn" /> In 2012, manuscripts in Han were translated to support Vietnam's claim to the [[Paracel Islands]].<ref name="VNN" />
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">

{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-08-07}}
==Most common characters==
</div><!--Volume 9, Issue 31-->
The following are the fifty most common characters in Nom literature.<ref name="chunom" /> The modern spelling is given in italics.
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">

* '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]'''
{{div col|colwidth=15em}}
* [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]]
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|羅}}}}</big> ''là'' to be
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]]
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|吧}}}}</big> ''và'' and
* [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 23:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|各}}}}</big> ''các'' each; every
</div>
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|没}}}}</big> ''một'' one
<!-- EdwardsBot 0594 -->
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|固}}}}</big> ''có'' there is
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𧵑}}}}</big> ''của'' of
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|得}}}}</big> ''được'' to get
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𥪝}}}}</big> ''trong'' in
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𤄯}}}}</big> ''trong'' clear
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𠊛}} (<small>or</small> {{linktext|𠊚}})}}</big> ''người'' people
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|忍}}}}</big> ''những'' (plural marker)
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|學}}}}</big> ''học'' to learn
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|如}}}}</big> ''như'' as
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|詞}}}}</big> ''từ'' word
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|會}}}}</big> ''hội'' to meet
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|咍}}}}</big> ''hay'' or; good
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|空}}}}</big> ''không'' not
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|体}}}}</big> ''thể'' body
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|四}}}}</big> ''tư'' four
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|拱}}}}</big> ''cũng'' also
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𠇍}}}}</big> ''với'' with
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|朱}}}}</big> ''cho'' to give
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|社}}}}</big> ''xã'' society, company
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|尼}}}}</big> ''này, nơi'' place
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|底}}}}</big> ''để'' to place
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|關}}}}</big> ''quan'' frontier, barrier, gate
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|觀}}}}</big> ''quan'' to see
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|場}}}}</big> ''trường'' school
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|本}}}}</big> ''bản'' composition
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𧗱}}}}</big> ''về'' to return; about
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|經}}}}</big> ''kinh'' classic works
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|行}}}}</big> ''hàng, hãng, hành, hạnh'' company, firm
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|航}}}}</big> ''hàng'' sail; navigate
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|産}}}}</big> ''sản'' to give birth
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𠚢}}}}</big> ''ra'' to get out
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|世}}}}</big> ''thế'' world; era
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|替}}}}</big> ''thế'' to replace
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|勢}}}}</big> ''thế'' position, power; like that, so
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|常}}}}</big> ''thường'' frequent; common, normal, usual
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|事}}}}</big> ''sự'' matter; event
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|妬}}}}</big> ''đó'' there; that
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|濟}}}}</big> ''tế'' to run
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|濟}}}}</big> ''tế'' border
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|頭}}}}</big> ''đầu'' head; top (of a multitude)
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|投}}}}</big> ''đầu'' to throw, to send
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𦓡}}}}</big> ''mà'' but
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|恪}}}}</big> ''khác'' another; further
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|一}}}}</big> ''nhất'' first
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|旦}}}}</big> ''đến, đán'' day, morning
* <big>{{vi-nom|{{linktext|家}}}}</big> ''gia'' home; family.
{{div col end}}

==Han texts==
[[File:Tale of Kieu, vol. 24, p.22.jpg|thumb|A page from ''[[The Tale of Kieu]]'' by [[Nguyen Du]]. This novel was first published in 1820, and it is the best-known work in Nom. The edition shown was printed in the late 19th century.]]
*[[Nguyễn Trãi]], ''Gia huấn ca'' ("The Family Training Ode"), a Confucian morality poem written in the 1420s.
* Đặng Trần Côn, ''[[Chinh phụ ngâm|Lament of A Soldier's Wife]]''
* Ngô Sĩ Liên, ''[[Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư|Complete Annals of Dai Viet]]''
* Trần Thế Pháp, ''[[Lĩnh Nam chích quái|Wondrous Tales of Linh Nam]]''
* [[Lê Quý Đôn]], ''Vân đài loại ngữ'' (an encyclopedia)
* Lê Quý Đôn, ''Frontier Chronicles''

==Nom texts==
*''Đại Việt sử ký tiệp lục tổng tự.''<ref name=history>''[http://lib.nomfoundation.org/collection/1/volume/115/ Đại Việt sử ký tiệp lục tổng tự]'', NLVNPF-0105 R.2254.</ref> This history of Vietnam was written during the [[Tay Son dynasty]]. The original is Han, and there is also a Nom translation.
*Nguyễn Du, ''The Tale of Kieu'' (1820)
*Nguyễn Trãi, ''Quốc âm thi tập'' ("National Language Poetry Compilation")
*Phạm Đình Hồ, ''Nhật Dụng Thường Đàm'' (1851). A Hae n-to-Nom dictionary for Vietnamese speakers.
*[[Nguyen Dinh Chieu|Nguyễn Đình Chiểu]], ''Lục Văn Tiên'' (19th century)
*[[Đặng Trần Côn]], ''Chinh Phụ Nghâm Khúc'' (18th century)
*[[Ho Xuan Huong|Hồ Xuân Hương]] (18th century) female poet

==Computer encoding==
In 1993, the Vietnamese government released an 8-bit coding standard for alphabetic Vietnamese (TCVN 5712:1993, or VSCII), as well as a 16-bit standard for Nom (TCVN 5773:1993).<ref name="Phan" /> This group of glyphs is referred to as "V0." In 1994, the [[Ideographic Rapporteur Group]] agreed to include Nom characters as part of [[Unicode]].<ref name="unicode" /> A revised standard, TCVN 6909:2001, defines 9,299 glyphs.<ref name="Hong" /> About half of these glyphs are specific to Vietnam.<ref name="Hong" /> Nom characters not already encoded were added to [[CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B|Unicode Extension B]].<ref name="Hong" /> (These characters have five-digit [[hexadecimal]] codepoints. The characters that were encoded earlier have four-digit hex.)

{| class="wikitable"
|- style="color:#fcf;"|
!Code!!Characters!!Unicode block!!Standard!!Date!!V Source!!Sources
|-
| style="text-align:center;"|V0||2,246||Basic Block (593), A (138), B (1,515)||TCVN 5773:1993||2001||V0-3021 to V0-4927||5
|-
| style="text-align:center;"|V1||3,311||Basic Block (3,110), C (1)||TCVN 6056:1995||1999||V1-4A21 to V1-6D35||2, 5
|-
| style="text-align:center;"|V2||3,205||Basic Block (763), A (151), B (2,291)||VHN 01:1998||2001||V2-6E21 to V2-9171||2, 5
|-
| style="text-align:center;"|V3||535||Basic Block (91), A (19), B (425)||VHN 02:1998||2001||V3-3021 to V3-3644||Manuscripts
|-
| style="text-align:center;"|V4||785 (encoded)||Extension C||Defined as sources 1, 3, and 6||2009||V4-4021 to V4-4B2F||1, 3, 6
|-
| style="text-align:center;"|V04||1,028||Extension E||Unencoded V4 and V6 characters||Projected||V04-4022 to V04-583E||V4: 1, 3, 6;<br>V6: 4, manuscripts
|-
| style="text-align:center;"|V5||~900||colspan="2"|Proposed in 2001, but already coded||2001||None||2, 5
|-
| colspan="7"|<small>'''Sources''': Nguyễn Quang Hồng,<ref name=Hong/> "[http://www.unicode.org/unibook/ Unibook Character Browser]," Unicode,Inc., "Code Charts - CJK Ext. E" (N4358-A).<ref name=CJK-E/></small>
|}

Characters were extracted from the following sources:
# Hoàng Triều Ân, ''Tự điển chữ Nôm Tày'' [Nom of the Tay People], 2003.
# Institute of Linguistics, ''Bảng tra chữ Nôm'' [Nom Index], Hanoi, 1976.
# Nguyễn Quang Hồng, editor, ''Tự điển chữ Nôm'' [Nom Dictionary], 2006.
# Father Trần Văn Kiệm, ''Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán Việt'' [Help with Nom and Sino-Vietnamese], 2004.
# Vũ Văn Kính & Nguyễn Quang Xỷ, ''Tự điển chữ Nôm'' [Nom Dictionary], Saigon, 1971.
# Vũ Văn Kính, ''Bảng tra chữ Nôm miền Nam'' [Table of Nom in the South], 1994.
# Vũ Văn Kính, ''Bảng tra chữ Nôm sau thế kỷ XVII'' [Table of Nom in the 17th Century], 1994.
# Vũ Văn Kính, ''Đại tự điển chữ Nôm'' [Great Nom Dictionary], 1999.
# Nguyễn Văn Huyên, ''Góp phần nghiên cứu văn hoá Việt Nam'' [Contributions to the Study of Vietnamese Culture], 1995.<ref name=Hong/>

The V2, V3, and V4 proposals were developed by a group at the Han-Nom Research Institute led by Nguyễn Quang Hồng.<ref name="Hong" /> V4, developed in 2001, includes over 400 ideograms formerly used by the [[Tay people]] of northern Vietnam.<ref name=Hong/> This allows the Tay language to get its own registration code.<ref name="Hong" /> V5 is a set of about 900 characters proposed in 2001.<ref name="Hong" /> As these characters were already part of Unicode, the IRG concluded that they could not be edited and no Vietnamese code was added.<ref name="Hong" /> (This is despite the fact that national codes were added retroactively for version 3.0 in 1999.) The Nom Na Group, led by Ngô Thanh Nhàn, published a set of nearly 20,000 Nom characters in 2005.<ref name="Ngo" /> This set includes both the characters proposed earlier and a large group of additional characters referred to as "V6".<ref name="Hong" /> These are mainly Han characters from Trần Văn Kiệm's dictionary which were already assigned codepoints. Character readings were determined manually by Hồng's group, while Nhàn's group developed software for this purpose.<ref name="VNPF" /> The work of the two groups was integrated and published in 2008 as the ''Hán Nôm Coded Character Repertoire''.<ref name="VNPF" />
<center>
{| class="wikitable"
|- style="color:#fcf;"|
!Character!!Composition!!Nom reading!!Han Viet!!English!!Codepoint!!V Source!!Other sources
|-
|style="text-align:center;"|<span style="font-size:140%;">{{vi-nom|{{linktext|吧}}}}</span>||⿰{{vi-nom|{{linktext|口|巴}}}}||ba||ba||[emphatic final particle]||U+5427||V0-3122||G0,J,KP,K,T
|-
|style="text-align:center;"|<span style="font-size:140%;">{{vi-nom|{{linktext|傷}}}}</span>||⿰{{vi-nom|{{linktext|忄|昜}}}}||thương||thương||to love||U+50B7||V1-4C22||G1,J,KP,K,T
|-
|style="text-align:center;"|<span style="font-size:140%;">{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𠊛}}}}</span>||⿰{{vi-nom|{{linktext|㝵|人}}}}||người||ngại ({{vi-nom|碍}})||people||U+2029B||V2-6E4F||None
|-
|style="text-align:center;"|<span style="font-size:140%;">{{vi-nom|{{linktext|㤝}}}}</span>||⿰{{vi-nom|{{linktext|忄|充}}}}||suông||song||to become interested in||U+391D||V3-313D||G3,KP,K,T
|-
|style="text-align:center;"|<span style="font-size:140%;">{{vi-nom|{{linktext|𫋙}}}}</span>||⿰{{vi-nom|{{linktext|虫|強}}}}||càng||cường ({{vi-nom|強}})||more, less||U+2B2D9||V4-536F||None
|-
|style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Nom Character V04-405E.svg|20px]]||⿰{{vi-nom|{{linktext|朝|乙}}}}||giàu||trào ({{vi-nom|朝}})||wealth||Not assigned||V04-405E||None
|-
| colspan="8"|<small>'''Key:''' G0 = China ([[GB 2312]]); G1 = China (GB 12345); G3 = China (GB 7589); GHZ = ''[[Hanyu Da Zidian]]''; J = Japan; KP= North Korea; K = South Korea; T = Taiwan.<br/>'''Sources''': [http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl? Unihan Database], [http://nomfoundation.org/ Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation], "Code Charts - CJK Ext. E" (N4358-A).<ref name=CJK-E/> The Han-Viet readings are from ''[http://www.hanviet.org/ Hán Việt Từ Điển]''.</small>
|}</center>

The characters that do not exist in Chinese have Han-Viet readings that are based on the characters given in parenthesis. The common character for ''càng'' ({{vi-nom|強}}) contains the radical {{vi-nom|虫}} (insects).<ref name=kiem/> This radical is added redundantly to create {{vi-nom|𫋙}}, a rare variation shown in the chart above. The character [[File:Nom Character V04-405E.svg|15px]] (''giàu'') is specific to the Tay people.<ref name="An" /> It is not yet part of the Unicode character set.<ref name="CJK-E2" /> It is a variation of {{vi-nom|朝}}, the corresponding character in Vietnamese.<ref name="NomFoundation" />

==References==
{{reflist|1|refs=
<ref name=CJK-pho>The character is part of the proposed set for Extension E. See "[http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4358-A.pdf Code Charts - CJK Ext. E]", (N4358-A), JTC1/SC2/WG2, Oct. 10, 2012, p. 5. The V Source code is V04-5055.</ref>

<ref name=mother>A diacritic is off. It should be, ''Mẹ tôi thường ăn chay ở chùa '''mỗi''' chủ Nhật.''</ref>

<ref name=Langenscheidt>''[http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=pyOzf86iZNUC&pg= Langenscheidt's Pocket Dictionary Vietnamese]'', p. 126. 2002. "'''Hán-Nôm''' Sino-Vietnamese characters."</ref>

<ref name=Hoang>Hoang Trang-Lan Nguyen, "[http://vietnamnews.vn/Sunday/Features/220749/vietnamese-neglect-han-nom-heritage.html Vietnamese neglect Han-Nom heritage]", ''Viet Nam News'', February 14, 2012.</ref>

<ref name=Noboyuki>Noboyuki, Matsuo, "The Han Nom Institute, Hanoi", ''[http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=HtZVAAAAYAAJ&q= Asian Research Trends: a Humanities and Social Science Review]'' Yunesuko Higashi Ajia Bunka Kenkyū Sentā (Tokyo, Japan), 1998, No. 8-10, p. 140, "Most of the source materials from premodern Vietnam are written in Chinese, obviously using Chinese characters; however, a portion of the literary genre is written in Vietnamese, using ''chu nom''. Therefore, ''han nom'' is the term designating the whole body of premodern written materials."</ref>

<ref name="phan">Châu Trinh Phan, "Monarchy and Democracy", ''[http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=EVclx5JdRPAC&dq= Phan Châu Trinh and His Political Writings]'', SEAP Publications, 2009, p. 126. This is a translation of a lecture Chau gave in Saigon in 1925. "Even at this moment, the so-called "Confucian scholars (i.e. those who have studied Chinese characters, and in particular, those who have passed the degrees of ''cử nhân'' (bachelor) and ''tiến sĩ'' [doctorate]) do not know anything, I am sure, of Confucianism. Yet every time they open their mouths they use Confucianism to attack modern civilization -- a civilization they do not comprehend even a tiny bit."</ref>
<ref name=Chung>{{vi}} Phùng Thành Chủng, "[http://damau.org/archives/10281 Hướng tới 1000 năm Thăng Long-Hà Nội]", November 12, 2009.</ref>

<ref name=Hanna>Hanna, Wm C., ''[http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=aJfv8Iyd2m4C&source=gbs_navlinks_s Asia's orthographic dilemma]'', University of Hawaii Press (1997), pp. 78-79, 82.</ref>

<ref name=Hanna77>Hanna, p. 77. "As a matter of fact, Vietnamese is no more monosyllabic than Chinese or other languages....What Vietnamese does share with Chinese is a monosyllabic morphology that, in my view, evolved in both languages under the influence of Chinese characters."</ref>

<ref name=Hanna78>Hanna, p. 78.</ref>

<ref name=Tong>{{vi}} Trần Nhân Tông, ''[[s:vi:Cư trần lạc đạo phú|Cư trần lạc đạo phú]]''</ref>

<ref name=McLeod>Mark W. McLeod, Thi Dieu Nguyen, ''[http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=a2TerRF1j74C&dq= Culture and Customs of Vietnam]'', Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001, p. 68.</ref>

<ref name=chu>Viết Luân Chu, ''[http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=-XZuAAAAMAAJ&q= Thanh Hóa, thế và lực mới trong thế kỷ XXI]'', 2003, p. 52</ref>

<ref name=Marr141>Marr, pp. 141. "Some of the problem lay in the tonal and nonagglutinative nature of Vietnamese as contrasted with Japanese or Korean."</ref>

<ref name=whatisnom>"[http://www.nomfoundation.org/nom-script/What-is-Nom- What is Nôm?]", Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation.</ref>

<ref name=KiemChar>Trần Văn Kiệm's dictionary has a total of 17,761 characters (See "[http://www.tapchithoidai.org/ThoiDai5/200505_NhomNomNa.pdf Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán-Việt - Văn phòng Nôm Na]".) ''Đại Tự Điển Chữ Nôm'' (2007) by Trương Đình Tín and Lê Quý Ngưu has over 19,000 characters.</ref>

<ref name=Ngo>Thanh Nhàn Ngô, ''[http://books.google.com.vn/books/about/Manual_the_N%C3%B4m_Na_Coded_Character_Set.html?id=YyIOHAAACAAJ Manual, the Nôm Na Coded Character Set]'', Nôm Na Group, Hanoi, 2005. The set contains 19,981 characters.</ref>

<ref name=VNPF>Institute of Hán-Nôm Studies and Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation, ''[http://nomfoundation.org/nom-tools/Nom-Books/54-Han_Nom_Coded_Character_Repertoire Kho Chữ Hán Nôm Mã Hoá]'' [Hán Nôm Coded Character Repertoire] (2008).</ref>

<ref name=Manh>Trịnh Khắc Mạnh, "[http://nomfoundation.org/nom-project/Han-Nom-coded-Characters Chữ Nôm và kho chữ Hán Nôm mã hóa]", Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation.</ref>

<ref name=Marr141-2>Marr, David, ''[http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=FkcZ_nGkW-oC&printsec= Vietnamese Tradition on Trial, 1920-1945]'', 1984, pp. 141-142. "Known subsequently as ''nom'', this unique Vietnamese script unfortunately remained even more unwieldy than the Chinese from which it was spawned. Unlike Japanese ''kana'' or Korean ''hangul'', there was no process of character simplification that resulted in a basic set of phonemes or syllables."</ref>

<ref name=Taberd>Taberd, J.L., ''[http://staging.nomfoundation.org/taberd/ Dictionarium Anamitico-Latinum]'', 1838. This is a revision of a dictionary by Pierre-Joseph Pigneau de Béhain published in 1772-1773. A reprint in 1884 was quite successful.</ref>

<ref name=Dinh>Quyen Vuong Dinh, ''[http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=uB2OAAAAMAAJ&q= Văn bản quản lý nhà nước và công tác công văn, giấy tờ thời phong kiến Việt Nam]'', 2002, p. 50. The decree is entitled, ''Xin khoan dung Quốc Âm'' ("Please respect the national voice.")</ref>

<ref name=Marr142A>Marr, p. 142.</ref>

<ref name=Marr142>Marr, p. 142. "More important, however, was the attitude of most Vietnamese literati, who continued to regard Chinese as the ultimate in civilized communication and thus considered ''nom'' a form of recreation...Meanwhile, the minority of the literati who took ''nom'' writing seriously had to be careful not to offend the fraternity or be accused of subversion through circulating 'vulgar' texts."</ref>

<ref name=chunom>"[http://www.chunom.org/charsets/ Comparison of Character Sets]", ''Chunom.org''</ref>

<ref name="HoiAn">"[http://english.vietnamnet.vn/fms/art-entertainment/10538/art---entertainment-in-brief-18-7.html Hoi An to teach calligraphy for free]",''VietnamNet'', 18 July 2011, "Hoi An, a central ancient city recognized as UNESCO’s World Heritage site, will hold free monthly classes on Han – Nom calligraphy to promote its cultural root."</ref>

<ref name="VNN">"[http://vietnamnews.vn/life-style/230658/ancient-han-documents-on-hoang-sa-islands-translated.html Ancient Han documents on Hoang Sa Islands translated]", ''Viet Nam News'', Sept., 27 2012. "Da Nang's Study Encouragement Association introduced ancient documents translated from Han Chinese script into Vietnamese at their new Han Nom centre on Monday."</ref>

<ref name=Phan>Luong Van Phan, "[http://www.cicc.or.jp/japanese/hyoujyunka/j-af15/15-21.pdf Country Report on Current Status and Issues of e-government Vietnam – Requirements for Documentation Standards]". The character list for the 1993 standard is given in [http://www.cs.nyu.edu/~nhan/npct-2.1.pdf Nôm Proper Code Table: Version 2.1] by Ngô Thanh Nhàn.</ref>

<ref name=unicode>"[http://www.unicode.org/uni2book/appA.pdf Han Unification History]", ''The Unicode Standard, Version 5.0'' (2006).</ref>

<ref name=Hong>{{vi}} Nguyễn Quang Hồng, "[http://nomfoundation.org/vn/du-an-nom/Kho-chu-Han-Nom-ma-hoa/Gioi-thieu-Kho-chu-Han-Nom-ma-hoa Giới thiệu Kho chữ Hán Nôm mã hoá]" [Encoding of Han-Nom Fonts], ''Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation''.</ref>

<ref name=CJK-E>"[http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4358-A.pdf Code Charts - CJK Ext. E]", (N4358-A), JTC1/SC2/WG2, Oct. 10, 2012.</ref>

<ref name=kiem>{{vi}} Trần Văn Kiệm, ''[http://nomfoundation.org/nom-tools/Nom-Dictionary Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán Việt]'' [Help with Nom and Sino-Vietnamese], 2004, "Entry càng", p. 290.</ref>

<ref name=CJK-E2>The character is part of the proposed set for Extension E. See "[http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4358-A.pdf Code Charts - CJK Ext. E]", (N4358-A), JTC1/SC2/WG2, Oct. 10, 2012, p. 5.</ref>

<ref name=NomFoundation>[http://nomfoundation.org/common/nom_details.php?codepoint=63830&img=1 Detailed information: V+63830"], Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation.<br/>"[http://nomfoundation.org/common/show_radical.php?radical=0005&img=1 List of Unicode Radicals]", VNPF.<br/>Kiệm, 2004, p. 424, "Entry giàu."<br/>[http://vdict.com/gi%C3%A0u,2,0,0.html Entry giàu]", VDict.com.</ref>

<ref name=An>Hoàng Triều Ân, ''Tự điển chữ Nôm Tày'' [Nom of the Tay People], 2003, p. 178.</ref>
}}

==External links==
{{Portal|Vietnam|Languages}}
*[http://www.chunom.org/ Chunom.org] "This site is about Chu Nom, the old writing system of Vietnam."
*[http://nomfoundation.org/ Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation]. Features a character dictionary.
*[http://nlv.gov.vn/ef/en/han-nom-collection.html Han-Nom Collection], digitized manuscripts held by the National Library of Vietnam.
*{{vi}} [http://www.hannom.org.vn/ Han-Nom Research Institute]
*{{vi}} [http://winvnkey.sourceforge.net/hannom/SoLuocCachNhapChuHanNom-toanbo.htm Cách Gõ Chữ Hán Nôm - WinVNKey] Software to allow the entry of Han-Nom characters by reading.
*{{zh icon}} [http://www.chinesecj.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=2596&extra=page%3D1 倉頡之友《倉頡平台2012》] [[Cangjie input method]] for Windows that allows keyboard entry of all [[Han unification|Unicode CJK characters]] by character shape. Supports over 70,000 characters. Users may add their own characters and character combinations.

===Fonts===
Some characters in this article may require the installation of an additional font to display properly:
*[http://sourceforge.jp/projects/hanazono-font/releases/ Hanamin B] &nbsp;–This Japanese font supports nearly 90,000 characters, including those in Unicode CJK Extension C.
*[http://nomfoundation.org/nom-tools/Nom-Font NomNaTongLight]&nbsp;– This font, created by the Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation, is based on characters found in traditional Vietnamese wood-block prints.
*[http://vietunicode.sourceforge.net/fonts/fonts_hannom.html Han Nom Font Set]&nbsp;– This open source font supports over 70,000 Unicode CJK codepoints.
*[http://www.chunom.org/pages/fonts/ Fonts for Chu Nom]. How to display and use Han-Nom characters.

{{Writing systems}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Han-Nom}}
[[Category:Chinese characters]]
[[Category:Chinese scripts| ]]
[[Category:Writing systems]]
[[Category:Chinese language]]
[[Category:Vietnamese writing systems]]
[[Category:Logographic writing systems]]

==Blocks==

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for '''disruptive and tendentious editing and continued edit-warring'''. Per our discussion above you returned to the same article and performed the same edit that resulted in your previous block despite knowing it was against the current consensus to do so. You continue to label those that disagree with you as vandals and accuse other editors of harassment, which is a form or personal attack. I provided plenty of opportunity for you to simply revert your restoration of the article and seek consensus, however you have chosen not to do so and therefore you have been blocked for 2 weeks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. &nbsp;[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 23:34, 11 July 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
{{unblock reviewed | 1=This is a two-week block for a single edit that reverted a page blanking.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han-Nom&diff=563875554&oldid=563485374] "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits...such as page blanking", is explicitly given as an exception to the 3RR principle in [[WP:3RRNO]]. Even if I reverted these blankings four times a day, which I never have, I would still be following the guideline. If this article was really "against consensus", it would have been deleted at AFD a long time ago. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner#top|talk]]) 05:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC) | decline=Restoring a redirect is not blanking, and is therefore not vandalism, and is therefore not exempt. The block is valid in face, and there's no valid reason for unblock provided in the unblock request ([[User talk:Bwilkins|✉→]]<span style="font-family:Forte, cursive, sans-serif;color:black">[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|←✎]]) 15:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 19:00, 14 August 2013

Back in June, I was a top Wikipedia contributer with a clean record. (I was ranked No. 1455, to be exact.) A few weeks later, I had an indefinite block. I never got a warning template, nor was my case ever considered at ANI, Arbcom, DRM, or anywhere else. In short, it was a total hit job. IP vandals get more due process than I did. If any other editor has ever been blocked for reverting the blanking of an article he wrote, it has escaped my notice.

I don’t see anything controversial about the article in question myself, and I find it unlikely anyone would object to it if someone other than me had written it. But here it is, so judge for yourself:


Han-Nom: A suspended Wikipedia article

This is the Han-Nom character for phở, a popular soup made from rice noodles. It is scheduled for inclusion in an upcoming extension of Unicode.[1] The radical on the left suggests that the meaning of the character is linked to rice. The remainder is a phonetic, a Chinese character used to indicate pronunciation.

Hán-Nôm, or Sino-Vietnamese characters,[2] are characters that were commonly used in Vietnam from the second century BC until the early 20th century. The script could be used to write either Classical Chinese ([Hán văn] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help)), or a form of Vietnamese called Nom ([chữ Nôm] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help)).[3][4] It includes both Chinese characters and characters based on the principles of Chinese writing, but particular to Vietnam.

Han was used by the court and for other official purposes, following the practice of the Chinese government at that time. The Temple of Literature in Hanoi was the best-known school for the study of Chinese. Students typically studied to pass the civil service examinations so that they might become magistrates.

In Nom, Chinese characters are used to write Vietnamese. A Vietnamese word can be written using a Chinese character for a word with a similar meaning or pronunciation. It is thus an ideographic script, although each character represents only one syllable. Vietnamese is a tonal language, and it has far more distinct syllables than other East Asian languages do.[5] Japanese and Korean, both non-tonal languages, developed phonetic scripts to supplement Chinese-based script long before Vietnam did.

In the 1920s, Han-Nom was replaced by Vietnamese alphabet, a Latin-based script that indicates tone. Unlike South Korea and Japan, modern Vietnam does not require students to study the traditional characters.[3] Fewer than 100 scholars worldwide can read Nom.[6] However, Han-Nom calligraphy remains popular as a home decoration and as a symbol of good luck.[3] The Han-Nom Research Institute in Hanoi, founded in 1970, collects and studies relevant manuscripts.[4] It has also created a standard for computer encoding.

Kauffner
Vietnamese name
VietnameseHán Nôm
Hán-Nôm

History

Chinese characters were introduced to Vietnam after the Han Empire conquered the country in 111 BC. Independence was achieved in 939, but the Chinese writing system was adopted for official purposes in 1010.[5] A bell engraved in 1076 is the earliest known example of a Nom inscription.[7] Nguyen Thuyen, who composed poetry in the 13th century, is sometimes given credit as the creator of Nom. However, none of his work has survived.[5] The oldest surviving Nom text is the collected poetry of Emperor Tran Nhan Tong written in the 13th century.[8] The Ming occupation of Vietnam (1407-1428) was highly destructive, and few Nom inscriptions survive from earlier times.[9] Nguyen Trai (1380–1442) wrote both Han and Nom literature in the 15th century.[9] Trinh Thi Ngoc Truc, consort of King Le Than Tong, is given credit for a 24,000 character bilingual Han-to-Nom dictionary written in the 17th century.[10]

A page from the bilingual dictionary Nhật dụng thường đàm (1851). Characters representing words in Hán (Chinese) are explained in Nôm (Vietnamese).

Unlike Han, Nom was not studied or classified systematically for most of its history.[11] Instead, authors who had studied Chinese applied the principles of Chinese writing to their native language. Although official records were generally kept in Han, Nom was used under two short-lived dynasties, the Ho dynasty (1400-1407) and the Tay Son (1778–1802). In 1838, Jean-Louis Taberd wrote a Nom dictionary that eventually gained wide acceptance and circulation.[12] In 1867, Catholic scholar Nguyen Truong To petitioned King Tu Duc to replace Han with Nom. The king did not consent to this, but he did respond with various efforts to promote Nom. A decree was issued which praised the script as Quốc Âm (the national voice), as opposed to chữ Nôm (chattering).[13]

In the 19th century, there was a flowering of popular literature written in Nom, including such classics as Nguyen Du's The Tale of Kieu and the poetry of Ho Xuan Huong. Although only 3 to 5 percent of the population was literate,[14] nearly every village had someone who could read Nom aloud for the benefit of other villagers.[15]

In Korea and Japan, the traditional writing system was simplified so it could be taught to the general public.[16] These nations created only a few hundred original characters.[5] Vietnam's educated class looked down on Nom as inferior to Han, so it was not interested in doing the work required to turn Nom into a form of writing suitable for mass communication.[17] Like Chinese, Vietnamese is a tonal language and has nearly 5,000 distinct syllables.[5] Neither the Korean nor the Japanese writing systems indicate tones, so they cannot be applied to the Vietnamese language.[11] As in Chinese, a semantic meaning is attributed to every syllable. This characteristic of the language may be can considered a result of the traditional writing system.[18]

As additional characters were created by combining pre-existing elements, Nom grew more complex.[5] One element might suggest Vietnamese pronunciation, while the other could be derived from a Chinese character with similar meaning. For example, the reading ba is indicated by the character . In Chinese, this character indicates the same sound as in Vietnamese, but it's meaning is unrelated: "to long for". For the character 𠀧 (⿺), horizontal lines are added to indicate that the meaning is "three." "Father" is also ba, but written as (⿰). "Turtle" is con ba ba (; ⿰虫巴). The Chinese also combined phonetic and semantic elements to create Han characters in ancient times. As the correspondence between sound and meaning is different in Vietnamese than it is in ancient Chinese, Nom involved the creation of thousands of additional characters. A set of nearly 20,000 characters has been proposed for a computer encoding standard, over 6,000 of these specific to Vietnam.[19][20]

The blue script is modern Vietnamese ([quốc ngữ] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help)), while the characters in brown and green are Han-Nom. It says, "My mother eats vegetarian food at the temple every Sunday."[21]

Beginning in the late 19th century, the French colonial authorities promoted the use of the Vietnamese alphabet, which they viewed as a stepping stone toward learning French. Language reform movements in other Asian nations stimulated Vietnamese interest in the subject. Following the Russo-Japanese War of 1905, Japan was increasingly cited as a model for modernization. The Confucian education system was compared unfavorably to the Japanese system of public education. According to a polemic by writer Phan Boi Chau, "so-called Confucian scholars" lacked knowledge of the modern world, as well as real understanding of Han literature. Their degrees showed only that they had learned how to write characters, he claimed.[22]

The popularity of Hanoi's short-lived Tonkin Free School suggested that broad reform was possible. In 1910, the colonial school system adopted a "Franco-Vietnamese curriculum", which emphasized French and alphabetic Vietnamese. The teaching of Chinese characters was discontinued in 1917.[23] On December 28, 1918, Emperor Khai Dinh declared that the traditional writing system no longer had official status.[23] The civil service exam was given for the last time at the imperial capital of Hue on January 4, 1919.[23] The examination system, and the education system based on it, had been in effect for almost 900 years.[23] China itself abandoned Han soon afterward as part of the May Fourth Movement.

In more recent times, Han-Nom has been a focus of calligraphy.[24] In 2012, manuscripts in Han were translated to support Vietnam's claim to the Paracel Islands.[25]

Most common characters

The following are the fifty most common characters in Nom literature.[26] The modern spelling is given in italics.

  • to be
  • and
  • các each; every
  • một one
  • there is
  • 𧵑 của of
  • được to get
  • 𥪝 trong in
  • 𤄯 trong clear
  • 𠊛 (or 𠊚) người people
  • những (plural marker)
  • học to learn
  • như as
  • từ word
  • hội to meet
  • hay or; good
  • không not
  • thể body
  • four
  • cũng also
  • 𠇍 với with
  • cho to give
  • society, company
  • này, nơi place
  • để to place
  • quan frontier, barrier, gate
  • quan to see
  • trường school
  • bản composition
  • 𧗱 về to return; about
  • kinh classic works
  • hàng, hãng, hành, hạnh company, firm
  • hàng sail; navigate
  • sản to give birth
  • 𠚢 ra to get out
  • thế world; era
  • thế to replace
  • thế position, power; like that, so
  • thường frequent; common, normal, usual
  • sự matter; event
  • đó there; that
  • tế to run
  • tế border
  • đầu head; top (of a multitude)
  • đầu to throw, to send
  • 𦓡 but
  • khác another; further
  • nhất first
  • đến, đán day, morning
  • gia home; family.

Han texts

A page from The Tale of Kieu by Nguyen Du. This novel was first published in 1820, and it is the best-known work in Nom. The edition shown was printed in the late 19th century.

Nom texts

  • Đại Việt sử ký tiệp lục tổng tự.[27] This history of Vietnam was written during the Tay Son dynasty. The original is Han, and there is also a Nom translation.
  • Nguyễn Du, The Tale of Kieu (1820)
  • Nguyễn Trãi, Quốc âm thi tập ("National Language Poetry Compilation")
  • Phạm Đình Hồ, Nhật Dụng Thường Đàm (1851). A Hae n-to-Nom dictionary for Vietnamese speakers.
  • Nguyễn Đình Chiểu, Lục Văn Tiên (19th century)
  • Đặng Trần Côn, Chinh Phụ Nghâm Khúc (18th century)
  • Hồ Xuân Hương (18th century) female poet

Computer encoding

In 1993, the Vietnamese government released an 8-bit coding standard for alphabetic Vietnamese (TCVN 5712:1993, or VSCII), as well as a 16-bit standard for Nom (TCVN 5773:1993).[28] This group of glyphs is referred to as "V0." In 1994, the Ideographic Rapporteur Group agreed to include Nom characters as part of Unicode.[29] A revised standard, TCVN 6909:2001, defines 9,299 glyphs.[30] About half of these glyphs are specific to Vietnam.[30] Nom characters not already encoded were added to Unicode Extension B.[30] (These characters have five-digit hexadecimal codepoints. The characters that were encoded earlier have four-digit hex.)

Code Characters Unicode block Standard Date V Source Sources
V0 2,246 Basic Block (593), A (138), B (1,515) TCVN 5773:1993 2001 V0-3021 to V0-4927 5
V1 3,311 Basic Block (3,110), C (1) TCVN 6056:1995 1999 V1-4A21 to V1-6D35 2, 5
V2 3,205 Basic Block (763), A (151), B (2,291) VHN 01:1998 2001 V2-6E21 to V2-9171 2, 5
V3 535 Basic Block (91), A (19), B (425) VHN 02:1998 2001 V3-3021 to V3-3644 Manuscripts
V4 785 (encoded) Extension C Defined as sources 1, 3, and 6 2009 V4-4021 to V4-4B2F 1, 3, 6
V04 1,028 Extension E Unencoded V4 and V6 characters Projected V04-4022 to V04-583E V4: 1, 3, 6;
V6: 4, manuscripts
V5 ~900 Proposed in 2001, but already coded 2001 None 2, 5
Sources: Nguyễn Quang Hồng,[30] "Unibook Character Browser," Unicode,Inc., "Code Charts - CJK Ext. E" (N4358-A).[31]

Characters were extracted from the following sources:

  1. Hoàng Triều Ân, Tự điển chữ Nôm Tày [Nom of the Tay People], 2003.
  2. Institute of Linguistics, Bảng tra chữ Nôm [Nom Index], Hanoi, 1976.
  3. Nguyễn Quang Hồng, editor, Tự điển chữ Nôm [Nom Dictionary], 2006.
  4. Father Trần Văn Kiệm, Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán Việt [Help with Nom and Sino-Vietnamese], 2004.
  5. Vũ Văn Kính & Nguyễn Quang Xỷ, Tự điển chữ Nôm [Nom Dictionary], Saigon, 1971.
  6. Vũ Văn Kính, Bảng tra chữ Nôm miền Nam [Table of Nom in the South], 1994.
  7. Vũ Văn Kính, Bảng tra chữ Nôm sau thế kỷ XVII [Table of Nom in the 17th Century], 1994.
  8. Vũ Văn Kính, Đại tự điển chữ Nôm [Great Nom Dictionary], 1999.
  9. Nguyễn Văn Huyên, Góp phần nghiên cứu văn hoá Việt Nam [Contributions to the Study of Vietnamese Culture], 1995.[30]

The V2, V3, and V4 proposals were developed by a group at the Han-Nom Research Institute led by Nguyễn Quang Hồng.[30] V4, developed in 2001, includes over 400 ideograms formerly used by the Tay people of northern Vietnam.[30] This allows the Tay language to get its own registration code.[30] V5 is a set of about 900 characters proposed in 2001.[30] As these characters were already part of Unicode, the IRG concluded that they could not be edited and no Vietnamese code was added.[30] (This is despite the fact that national codes were added retroactively for version 3.0 in 1999.) The Nom Na Group, led by Ngô Thanh Nhàn, published a set of nearly 20,000 Nom characters in 2005.[19] This set includes both the characters proposed earlier and a large group of additional characters referred to as "V6".[30] These are mainly Han characters from Trần Văn Kiệm's dictionary which were already assigned codepoints. Character readings were determined manually by Hồng's group, while Nhàn's group developed software for this purpose.[32] The work of the two groups was integrated and published in 2008 as the Hán Nôm Coded Character Repertoire.[32]

Character Composition Nom reading Han Viet English Codepoint V Source Other sources
ba ba [emphatic final particle] U+5427 V0-3122 G0,J,KP,K,T
thương thương to love U+50B7 V1-4C22 G1,J,KP,K,T
𠊛 người ngại () people U+2029B V2-6E4F None
suông song to become interested in U+391D V3-313D G3,KP,K,T
𫋙 càng cường () more, less U+2B2D9 V4-536F None
giàu trào () wealth Not assigned V04-405E None
Key: G0 = China (GB 2312); G1 = China (GB 12345); G3 = China (GB 7589); GHZ = Hanyu Da Zidian; J = Japan; KP= North Korea; K = South Korea; T = Taiwan.
Sources: Unihan Database, Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation, "Code Charts - CJK Ext. E" (N4358-A).[31] The Han-Viet readings are from Hán Việt Từ Điển.

The characters that do not exist in Chinese have Han-Viet readings that are based on the characters given in parenthesis. The common character for càng () contains the radical (insects).[33] This radical is added redundantly to create 𫋙, a rare variation shown in the chart above. The character (giàu) is specific to the Tay people.[34] It is not yet part of the Unicode character set.[35] It is a variation of , the corresponding character in Vietnamese.[36]

References

  1. ^ The character is part of the proposed set for Extension E. See "Code Charts - CJK Ext. E", (N4358-A), JTC1/SC2/WG2, Oct. 10, 2012, p. 5. The V Source code is V04-5055.
  2. ^ Langenscheidt's Pocket Dictionary Vietnamese, p. 126. 2002. "Hán-Nôm Sino-Vietnamese characters."
  3. ^ a b c Hoang Trang-Lan Nguyen, "Vietnamese neglect Han-Nom heritage", Viet Nam News, February 14, 2012.
  4. ^ a b Noboyuki, Matsuo, "The Han Nom Institute, Hanoi", Asian Research Trends: a Humanities and Social Science Review Yunesuko Higashi Ajia Bunka Kenkyū Sentā (Tokyo, Japan), 1998, No. 8-10, p. 140, "Most of the source materials from premodern Vietnam are written in Chinese, obviously using Chinese characters; however, a portion of the literary genre is written in Vietnamese, using chu nom. Therefore, han nom is the term designating the whole body of premodern written materials."
  5. ^ a b c d e f Hanna, Wm C., Asia's orthographic dilemma, University of Hawaii Press (1997), pp. 78-79, 82.
  6. ^ "What is Nôm?", Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation.
  7. ^ Trịnh Khắc Mạnh, "Chữ Nôm và kho chữ Hán Nôm mã hóa", Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation.
  8. ^ Template:Vi Trần Nhân Tông, Cư trần lạc đạo phú
  9. ^ a b Mark W. McLeod, Thi Dieu Nguyen, Culture and Customs of Vietnam, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001, p. 68.
  10. ^ Viết Luân Chu, Thanh Hóa, thế và lực mới trong thế kỷ XXI, 2003, p. 52
  11. ^ a b Marr, pp. 141. "Some of the problem lay in the tonal and nonagglutinative nature of Vietnamese as contrasted with Japanese or Korean."
  12. ^ Taberd, J.L., Dictionarium Anamitico-Latinum, 1838. This is a revision of a dictionary by Pierre-Joseph Pigneau de Béhain published in 1772-1773. A reprint in 1884 was quite successful.
  13. ^ Quyen Vuong Dinh, Văn bản quản lý nhà nước và công tác công văn, giấy tờ thời phong kiến Việt Nam, 2002, p. 50. The decree is entitled, Xin khoan dung Quốc Âm ("Please respect the national voice.")
  14. ^ Hanna, p. 78.
  15. ^ Marr, p. 142.
  16. ^ Marr, David, Vietnamese Tradition on Trial, 1920-1945, 1984, pp. 141-142. "Known subsequently as nom, this unique Vietnamese script unfortunately remained even more unwieldy than the Chinese from which it was spawned. Unlike Japanese kana or Korean hangul, there was no process of character simplification that resulted in a basic set of phonemes or syllables."
  17. ^ Marr, p. 142. "More important, however, was the attitude of most Vietnamese literati, who continued to regard Chinese as the ultimate in civilized communication and thus considered nom a form of recreation...Meanwhile, the minority of the literati who took nom writing seriously had to be careful not to offend the fraternity or be accused of subversion through circulating 'vulgar' texts."
  18. ^ Hanna, p. 77. "As a matter of fact, Vietnamese is no more monosyllabic than Chinese or other languages....What Vietnamese does share with Chinese is a monosyllabic morphology that, in my view, evolved in both languages under the influence of Chinese characters."
  19. ^ a b Thanh Nhàn Ngô, Manual, the Nôm Na Coded Character Set, Nôm Na Group, Hanoi, 2005. The set contains 19,981 characters.
  20. ^ Trần Văn Kiệm's dictionary has a total of 17,761 characters (See "Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán-Việt - Văn phòng Nôm Na".) Đại Tự Điển Chữ Nôm (2007) by Trương Đình Tín and Lê Quý Ngưu has over 19,000 characters.
  21. ^ A diacritic is off. It should be, Mẹ tôi thường ăn chay ở chùa mỗi chủ Nhật.
  22. ^ Châu Trinh Phan, "Monarchy and Democracy", Phan Châu Trinh and His Political Writings, SEAP Publications, 2009, p. 126. This is a translation of a lecture Chau gave in Saigon in 1925. "Even at this moment, the so-called "Confucian scholars (i.e. those who have studied Chinese characters, and in particular, those who have passed the degrees of cử nhân (bachelor) and tiến sĩ [doctorate]) do not know anything, I am sure, of Confucianism. Yet every time they open their mouths they use Confucianism to attack modern civilization -- a civilization they do not comprehend even a tiny bit."
  23. ^ a b c d Template:Vi Phùng Thành Chủng, "Hướng tới 1000 năm Thăng Long-Hà Nội", November 12, 2009.
  24. ^ "Hoi An to teach calligraphy for free",VietnamNet, 18 July 2011, "Hoi An, a central ancient city recognized as UNESCO’s World Heritage site, will hold free monthly classes on Han – Nom calligraphy to promote its cultural root."
  25. ^ "Ancient Han documents on Hoang Sa Islands translated", Viet Nam News, Sept., 27 2012. "Da Nang's Study Encouragement Association introduced ancient documents translated from Han Chinese script into Vietnamese at their new Han Nom centre on Monday."
  26. ^ "Comparison of Character Sets", Chunom.org
  27. ^ Đại Việt sử ký tiệp lục tổng tự, NLVNPF-0105 R.2254.
  28. ^ Luong Van Phan, "Country Report on Current Status and Issues of e-government Vietnam – Requirements for Documentation Standards". The character list for the 1993 standard is given in Nôm Proper Code Table: Version 2.1 by Ngô Thanh Nhàn.
  29. ^ "Han Unification History", The Unicode Standard, Version 5.0 (2006).
  30. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Template:Vi Nguyễn Quang Hồng, "Giới thiệu Kho chữ Hán Nôm mã hoá" [Encoding of Han-Nom Fonts], Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation.
  31. ^ a b "Code Charts - CJK Ext. E", (N4358-A), JTC1/SC2/WG2, Oct. 10, 2012.
  32. ^ a b Institute of Hán-Nôm Studies and Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation, Kho Chữ Hán Nôm Mã Hoá [Hán Nôm Coded Character Repertoire] (2008).
  33. ^ Template:Vi Trần Văn Kiệm, Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán Việt [Help with Nom and Sino-Vietnamese], 2004, "Entry càng", p. 290.
  34. ^ Hoàng Triều Ân, Tự điển chữ Nôm Tày [Nom of the Tay People], 2003, p. 178.
  35. ^ The character is part of the proposed set for Extension E. See "Code Charts - CJK Ext. E", (N4358-A), JTC1/SC2/WG2, Oct. 10, 2012, p. 5.
  36. ^ Detailed information: V+63830", Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation.
    "List of Unicode Radicals", VNPF.
    Kiệm, 2004, p. 424, "Entry giàu."
    Entry giàu", VDict.com.

External links

Fonts

Some characters in this article may require the installation of an additional font to display properly:

  • Hanamin B  –This Japanese font supports nearly 90,000 characters, including those in Unicode CJK Extension C.
  • NomNaTongLight – This font, created by the Vietnamese Nôm Preservation Foundation, is based on characters found in traditional Vietnamese wood-block prints.
  • Han Nom Font Set – This open source font supports over 70,000 Unicode CJK codepoints.
  • Fonts for Chu Nom. How to display and use Han-Nom characters.

Blocks

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive and tendentious editing and continued edit-warring. Per our discussion above you returned to the same article and performed the same edit that resulted in your previous block despite knowing it was against the current consensus to do so. You continue to label those that disagree with you as vandals and accuse other editors of harassment, which is a form or personal attack. I provided plenty of opportunity for you to simply revert your restoration of the article and seek consensus, however you have chosen not to do so and therefore you have been blocked for 2 weeks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:34, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kauffner (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is a two-week block for a single edit that reverted a page blanking.[1] "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits...such as page blanking", is explicitly given as an exception to the 3RR principle in WP:3RRNO. Even if I reverted these blankings four times a day, which I never have, I would still be following the guideline. If this article was really "against consensus", it would have been deleted at AFD a long time ago. Kauffner (talk) 05:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Restoring a redirect is not blanking, and is therefore not vandalism, and is therefore not exempt. The block is valid in face, and there's no valid reason for unblock provided in the unblock request (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.