User talk:Noctorium

Welcome!

Hello, MusicSoundsGoodAgency!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Cahk (talk) 07:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, MusicSoundsGoodAgency. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 07:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rinaly (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rinaly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MusicSoundsGoodAgency! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rinaly (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only the 'Festival Career' section (which I would argue shouldn't even be there!) is referenced, where is all the rest of the info coming from?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rinaly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello MusicSoundsGoodAgency. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MusicSoundsGoodAgency. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MusicSoundsGoodAgency|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I realise that you have made a general COI disclosure on your user page; thank you for that. However, given your user name, and the nature of your edits, I believe you may have the more specific paid-editing COI, which needs to be disclosed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing

Hey thank you for the infotmation!I am not being paid by her if that matters, my management of her is to help me learn the business as I am just starting out in the music industry. Does that matter for the paid COI?

Purely thought we should setup a wiki for her because she has become noticable enough of a DJ. So for the edits, since she is a personal friend of mine, i just reach out about information to make sure its correct.

I can just pay for someone to make it though, as she deserves this I think. Do you know a service you trust? MusicSoundsGoodAgency (talk) 13:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for responding. If you're not getting paid or otherwise rewarded, and have nothing to gain financially, then you probably don't need to make the paid-editing disclosure, the general COI one you have on your user page may suffice.

I wouldn't advise you to pay anyone to create this, and I certainly couldn't recommend anyone. A hired editor would need to make the same disclosures and would be essentially in the same position as you with their COI. Also, there are so many less-than-scrupulous paid editors out there that you might find they take your money and fail to deliver what was agreed. And certainly don't respond to anyone approaching you, offering to create this article for money, that's unlikely to end well (see WP:SCAM for more on this).

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing

thank you for letting me know! i was approached a few times but was trying to figure this out on my own. I will keep reviewing the rules and improve the article!

didnt know what i was getting into when I started this 😅 MusicSoundsGoodAgency (talk) 15:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, article creation is probably the most difficult thing one can do on Wikipedia (apart from all the administrator etc. stuff), especially where notability needs to be demonstrated (which it does, for most things) and/or where promotionality is an issue. I think I had been editing for nearly ten years before I attempted my first article, and even then I got more things wrong than right! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing

sorrycant figure out hiw to respond if i can in the help desk but that information is great thank you. I saw the notice of depreciated but it didnt state which site and thought i removed the right one. thank you for your patience and guidance. MusicSoundsGoodAgency (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rinaly has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rinaly. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]