User talk:Pablo X: Difference between revisions
→the whole world is watching: new section |
|||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Cheers! [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 16:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
Cheers! [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 16:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
== the whole world is watching == |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/A Man In Black/Evidence#Evidence presented by Uncle G]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/A Man In Black/Workshop#AMiB made an attack page about User:Ikip]] |
|||
You may want to watchlist all the case pages. Cheers, [[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 05:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:00, 24 May 2009
yahn (2005—2007) | tahn (2009)
Regarding G. Shanmugam
A Good Morning to you (at least it's morning here). To deny a speedy deletion it is sufficient if there are alegations of notability (which in this case were there: "...eminent.." and "...leading the institute to become one of the best self financed...". I agree that the article would probably be deleted via an AfD, but speedy is out of the question. Cheeers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 06:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
explanation
I removed an unreference tag from an article that already had references.
I see now you added the tag, and then added the references.
There are, I am afraid, some contributors who go around slapping tags like {{unreferenced}} on articles without regard to whether they are applicable, based on their personal cultural biases. I thought this tag application was an example of that.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
the whole world is watching
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/A Man In Black/Evidence#Evidence presented by Uncle G
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/A Man In Black/Workshop#AMiB made an attack page about User:Ikip
You may want to watchlist all the case pages. Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)