User talk:Powergate92

ONTv logo

If the original is copyrighted, then you can't just draw your own version and claim it to be the original logo. For one thing, it isn't the original logo - it's just your version of it - and secondly, if it's a replication of the original, it is still non-free because it's a derivative work of the original. Black Kite 17:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

• It's been sent to PUI for discussion. Black Kite 18:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

AutoEd

Please stop using AutoEd to clean up the articles. It doesn't do anything to the pages and is only putting in spaces where they were not before. The pages do not need the cleanup you are performing.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Stargate Universe

Seriously, STOP reverting the numbers back in. You're obviously well-intentioned, and I have no doubt you're only doing what you feel is right. However, this is becoming disruptive. I've no problem discussing this or with pointing you to the relevant recent discussions (there are lots) but if you insist on edit warring over it then that becomes a problem above and beyond the content issue. Editors have been blocked for insisting on doing what you're doing. Again, this is not a threat, but a plea for you to stop your actions before it becomes necessary. --Ckatz^chat_spy 17:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

List

Most seasons are released in seperate volumes, and than later released in one complete box set.. The article sais that a Complete Box Set will be released later, while i'm gessing that Stargate Universe won't be one of the few shows in the world without a Complete season box set releases. --TIAYN (talk) 20:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

And i'll do the same two you (WP:3RR). Powergate92, the writer of the article clearly stated this is not 100% sure. (Comment section) + that the information came from an interview, so they think it will might happen. And the article opens up with a "may", which means they aren't sure!!! --TIAYN (talk) 05:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm blocking you :D --TIAYN (talk) 05:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

You have reverted me three times, and the source your using aren't even sure about the two volumes.... --TIAYN (talk) 06:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

You have reverted me three times? See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Stargate_Universe_episodes&action=history. And as i have said to you, your source is not even sure if the show is going to be released in two volumes. Your source opens up with a "may". And the writer, David Read sais:

Folks, please remember that this is yet to be confirmed. I placed a question mark in the title because it has yet to be verified — not because I wrote it in disbelief. Just keep it in mind, it is still early and there is no guarantee until a formal announcement is made.

--TIAYN (talk) 06:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Admin note Both of you, drop it and keep this on the article talk page. Honestly, I could easily block both of you right now for this behaviour. TIAYN, you should really know better given that you just had a block for the same revert issues a few weeks ago. As for Powergate92, you were edit warring earlier today at Stargate Universe and you are breaching the spirit of the 3RR rules at the list. Note that you do not have the right to revert three times; that is only a benchmark for the guideline, and it is not a target you should be aiming for. 3RR blocks come for violations of the spirit of the rules as much as they do for the technical details. --Ckatz^chat_spy 08:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Infobox

Consensus and ideas can change over time, especially when someone in that discussion has been banned.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes consensus can change but there has not been a discussion to change the consensus so stop reverting. Powergate92Talk 21:51, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

You stop reverting. I don't think we need to constantly update this thing twice on one page. It's better to have one updated number rather than two.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

And now you got Black Kite to revert for you. I am going to initiate a new discussion at WT:TOKU about this issue.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

I did not ask Black Kite to revert your edit, I asked Black Kite "What do you think about this?" Powergate92Talk 22:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

You indirectly asked him to revert.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Leave Black Kite out of our dispute. He does not need to be updated about everything I do. We had no agreement over weekly, monthly, or seasonal updates. There is a discussion at WT:TOKU which should get more than the two of us talking, because it will go nowhere. This does not mean you should go and find people who agree with you to build up a new consensus.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

I was asking other user what they think about this, if you look, you will see that the users I asked (User:Ckatz and User:Black Kite) are users I disagreed with within the last month. Powergate92Talk 00:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Neither user needs to be asked of their opinion on these matters anymore. All that matters now is that a new consensus be reached.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Just drop it and it will be updated when it will be updated. Weekly updates are entirely unnecessary. You don't contribute to these pages so why do you even bother with the fucking infobox number? And stop reverting me over something so trivial as a request to not have this number updated on a weekly basis when I DON'T WANT THE DAMN NUMBER AT ALL.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:29, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

There is absolutely no reason to have reported me to WP:AN3 other than to get your way in the dispute. You essentially asked Black Kite to revert my edits so you did not have to. The number is there now but now you're pulling in nitpicking specifics because you want to update a number of episodes on an article for a show which you do not watch after every week. While the formatting of these articles includes an episode list on the article itself as well as a separate episode list article, the lists on the main article serve a purpose, whereas a single parameter in the infobox does not. It's not a terrible thing that people have a link to the section in the article that has the number which is updated whenever the episode list on the article is updated.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

MOS:UNLINKDATES

Last I checked, this particular aspect of the manual of style was extremely disputed over its usage. Before you continue to use automated edits that are not labeled as automated to unlink the dates all over, I'd like you to show me that this particular aspect of the MOS is widely accepted.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

My edits were not automated. WP:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) is a Wikipedia guideline and I do not see any current discussion at WT:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) about it being "extremely disputed over its usage". Powergate92Talk 04:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

There were two separate arbitration cases about it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Can you add the links for the "two separate arbitration cases about it"? Also if it's "extremely disputed over its usage" then why is it still part of WP:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)? Powergate92Talk 04:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure what has come about of it or why it's not mentioned anywhere on that page.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

If your not going to add links for discussions about it being "extremely disputed over its usage" then I am going to revert your edits. Powergate92Talk 05:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Just letting you know, I've filed an Arbitration Enforcement request over this: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Powergate92 jgpTC 03:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Content

You know, I haven't actually seen you actually add any substantive content to any Power Rangers, Super Sentai, Kamen Rider, etc. articles. You've just been doing automated cleaning and an enforcing of various guidelines and manuals of style to the articles. I actually can't find any actual content you've added to any article in the past few months.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

On September 3, 2009 I added some info to the "International broadcasts" section in the Kamen Rider: Dragon Knight article,[1] on October 5, 2009 I added some references to the "Production" section in the Power Rangers: RPM article.[2] Also I edit other articles you know as I been editing the Stargate Universe‎ article and I made the article Spliced (TV series). Powergate92Talk 23:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Neither of those additions to the Dragon Knight or RPM pages really count.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)