User talk:RTG

Are we there yet?

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from RichardWeiss! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:

Again, welcome. Thanks, SqueakBox 16:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing better to do with it... Relative permeability, constant force on all things, and the mechanics behind reflecting waves, is the key. (and mechanical hydrophobia for the lensing part)

It is similar to [1], but with a more pronounced effect, finer with more points and curves, beyond our conception. It is like when the guy is falling in Interstellar. It's all chopped and sliced into, almost infinity. I'm not making this stuff up, I'm just explaining it.

Waves in fluid we can see, in the ocean for instance, are pointy on the upper side and curvy on the lower side. Aerodynamically, a curve is more of a barrier, while a point cuts through an opposing object, allowing it to slide its way past. Like the pointy nose on a supersonic aircraft, it is like aerodynamics. It works on an apparently stationary object because, being made of light, matter is always being pushed equally in all directions. If it is pushed equally in all directions in a plane where one direction is more permeable... it moves toward, through, the permeability.

It also describes lensing around the disturbance. Why? Like a hydrophobic surface, the fluid action of the light forces some of it to stay above the pointy surface texture of the rippling (see video) disturbance rather than through it, probably with a varying degree that could be considered event horizon. There would be a point at which the texture is reflective to the light like a hydrophobic surface.

These points *may* be from a finer grained light-like force *behind* the light, which we do not detect, and that part is complicated because... is it the light which is creating the pattern, or what is beneath the light driving it on?) This defines the reach of the gravitational effect.

The force behind the light is another matter. Now that would be something to talk about. The force between the light and something else, perhaps nothing, such as true space type nothing, nothingness...

It is no explanation of what matter is, and it is a poorly presented explanation of the gravity, but an explanation none the less... because now they are teaching is that there is no force... because of because, so my explanation is better than that, and a proper educator might be able to toy with it and come up with a child-worthy dissemination.

Relative permeability, constant force on all things, and the mechanics behind reflecting waves, is the key. Gravity cuts us into pieces.

Thanks very much, no I hate most of you, the site itself is worth infinitely more than your pompous attitudes, you've killed so much of the site by cheating, just like everything else, bye bye again o/

P.S.

Yeah I know I will get blocked off the page. I explained what to image to explain gravity, didn't I? But it wasn't an Einstein grade explanation? It wasn't Jesus explanation? I'm not coming back until YOU change. I don't care about my individual importance. That is MY side. I am not here for the who. I just respect the who. I would not be such an idiot as to let the who wash out the what. This site is supposed to be the what, ONLY. I don't want to be adversarial at all.

No I don't care if it didn't make sense. The main points are there. Permeability, hydrophobia, universal force, wave mechanics. Anyone who truly cares about it will figure it out if they need to.

Now. Thanks again, block away...

... ...

All day? What is wrong with you?

It doesn't curve space. Ripples are circular, or in this case spherical, which is curved, from our puny perspective. Oh and, reflecting was a poor choice of words for the hydrophobic effect. Some of the light skitters rather than penetrates and comes around smoothly. Now shut this page down if you don't want it. I am bored of wondering what I might do with it in terms of quipping back or begging in. My backside do I want to join in either to fight or to grovel. Trust me, there'll be little of worth after, I'll call it, Converging Wave Theory. There may be name calling even, and I am a bit too good at that for even my own comfort, when I really mean it. Perfection? What good is perfection? What was it that movie said? What good is heaven if all we do is sit around and look at the face of god? My face isn't worth looking at. I really don't belong here any more. I really did at one time. And I promise, name calling will come. I know some of you watch it to shut it down. Off with you. I am all that lovely stuff I was lambasted with, and more. Thanks to every other o/

Sierpinski... See... er... pins key. It's born of a series of coincidence.

Everything/waves reflect... the waves converge while also passing through each other. There is elasticity in it. (Math cannot describe infinity either, like the most simple concept to a living being. What part of this site is the worst at explaining anything, and you allow them not to take queries let alone suggestions? Infinity = no stop...) Anyway... Waves... It IS the system, the WHOLE, rather than the part individually, like something I wrote about this site once and some other interesting coincidences/convergences.

Where is my final insult this lovely morning? (I suppose I knew when the chess guy got banned for 6 months, so harsh as to be wicked, I nearly died, the humour sank out of me like blood, I was sorry I even complained, he was on my side... BAM fly squashed... but was it a fly though... Sure who cares about chess huh? Some people talk too much and cannot be tolerated... classically sick in the mind, the site is, and it is a mind, like it or not.)

It is a disturbance in, something, and it continues to move, but elasticated, like a universal model... Maybe that blank spot after the bang has something to do with the first ripple coming back. Maybe there was no gravitation at the start, there couldn't have been now could there, only potential, and that was the point of gravity, as the first waves returned somehow. To think of it like that, all those little points appearing and changing everything? A ripple within a ripple, is that the point of chaos in the universe? I still believe it collapses inwards and simply appears to expand. It makes more sense. That it decays rather than expands eternally. It is just almost eternal. It would explain the first ripple, wouldn't it? An outer extremity.

In truth, it is the hexagon I want to understand. The wider universe is beyond us. Useless. We are its subjects. Hexagons now, in nature, there is a mysterious subject. One step at a time though.

Goodbye.