User talk:Smith Jones

User talk:Smith Jones/My carhive <---ARCHIVE

Given the level of dysfunction that has come to prevail on Wikipedia, the most appropriate course for a principled scientist is to withdraw from the project.

The bureaucracy should either take corrective steps to fix this situation, or else suffer the eventual loss of huge amounts of valuable talent and volunteered resources.

If you agree with this statement, post it to your pages, and pass it on. (discuss this here)

Neutral viewpoint

Thanks for your contribution here. It's a shame that if you had a problem with my conduct you didn't say to me first as I did with the user in question. It wasn't my intention to "rat" anyone out I just wanted a neutral opinion. Difficult to get round here. Mallanox 17:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Alan Cabal

Hey: I added two more sources about the Zundel article. Now the thing to do is actually find out the title of Alan Cabal's article and the date. It is in Counterpunch somewhere.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It looks like the article is coming along nicely. I contacted Counterpunch about making the article about Zundel available on their web site so that people can read it. Who knows what will become of that but it would be a big help. It's always better for someone to go read the source when it's this controversial.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 00:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks. It's always nice to get a barnstar! The debates around what to include or exclude oftens seems not so much about the information itself, but about the status of having a Wikipedia article on the information - by having an article it means that information pops up on Google searches, and gets mirrored on other sites. Some people feel strongly that certain bits of information, especialy regarding individuals, shouldn't get such a priority treatment. I can understand that view. My own personal inclination is toward the merging of information into parent articles where possible. SilkTork *^YES! 10:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar! That was my first RickK.--LAAFan 17:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Homeopathy

Your recent edit seems disruptive. To avoid doubt, please note this warning. Colonel Warden (talk) 06:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)